tien forum 2-18-07

Upload: rameshs2611

Post on 14-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    1/20

    1

    Cell Phones Impact and

    Its 4GByDr. William C.Y. Lee

    Chairman, Treyspan Inc,Formerly VP and Chief Scientist

    Vodafone AirTouch PLC

    Chancellor Tien Forum

    At ITRI- USA

    Feb. 8, 2007

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    2/20

    Mobile Communications Had

    An Uneasy and Shaky Past

    Caused By Congress Caused By FCC

    Caused By Industry

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    3/20

    Why Mobile communications

    Research Started in 1964 at Bell

    Labs.

    Congress took away the satellitecommunications Business from AT&T

    New research for Mobiletelecommunications was needed

    Picture Phone market could not be takenoff

    IC technology for car phones was possible

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    4/20

    The Policy of The USA Congress

    Afraid of Monopoly 1% of AT&T annual revenue to support Bell Labs,

    created IPR used by the industry without pay

    1974: Asked AT&T to open bid its car phone

    manufacturing to the industry 1974 OKI won the bid for the first 200 car

    phones

    1975 OKI, Motorola, E.F.Johnson won the1800 car phones

    1981: Judge Harold Green was in chargedivesting AT&T

    1983: AT&Ts 22 operating companies became 7

    baby Bellcompanies and were divested 1983 Mobile phone business went to Baby Bells

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    5/20

    FCCs Counteractive Rule-Making on

    Spectrum for Mobile Communications

    Before 1974: Allocated 82 channels, 6MHz/ch., in UHF Band to TV Industry.

    Thus 10 GHz band was only possible formobile communication

    After 1974: Allocated 70MHzx2 spectrumin 800MHz band. Among them, 40 MHz wasput in use and 30 MHz was reserved

    1983: Within 40 MHz allocation, 20 MHzwent to telephone companies and 20 MHzwent to non-telephone companies.

    1983: First USA cellular system operated

    in Chicago.

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    6/20

    The Factors of Delay

    Deploying Until 1983

    Complained by RCC (RadioCommon Carriers), an industrygroup of dispatching and paging

    Tried to avoid to be divested

    Took time to negotiate amongthe industry.

    A resale policy was created

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    7/20

    The Key Factor of Making 1G

    Successful

    Requirement Quality No bottleneck as a market product Handoff feature High capacity

    Successful Factors Took a large scale trial at Chicago in 1977-1978 Excellent quality User Friendly, like landline phones

    Drawbacks Needed rooftop antennas Transceivers were in the car trunks

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    8/20

    GSMs Story

    An European digital mobile systemdeveloped in 1983 and deployed in 1991

    Was threatened by UKs CT-2

    Not designed for a high capacity system atthe time

    No licensed fee to pay for themanufacturers in European Community

    Accepted by China and fully deployed in1995

    Becomes almost a global system

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    9/20

    Fate of NA-TDMA

    1987 CTIA formed a sub-committee toselect a 2G system, a high capacity system(10x AMPS) for Northern America

    FDMA was first tentatively chosen

    Decided TDMA because of GSMs influence

    A poor designed system for high capacity

    CDMAs superiority Finally TDMA converted to GSM systems

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    10/20

    Why CDMA

    MILESTONE

    Qualcomm visited Pactel and asked astudy contract for using CDMA in Cellularsystem in Feb. 1989 but lack of a power

    control scheme In April 1989, Qualcomm returned to

    Pactel with a new created power controlscheme

    Pactel knew the NA-TDMA would befailed, challenged Qualcomm to make ademo in six months and funded themone million dollars.

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    11/20

    Why CDMA (cont.)MILESTONE (cont.)

    August 1989 Pactel funded another onemillions dollars

    Nov.3, 1989, a demo was taken placein San Diego; two sites and one carphone. Pactel provided technicalassistance and the spectrum for them

    The 1989 demo was made verysuccessfully and shocked world

    Nov.1990 Korea bought CDMAtechniques from Qualcomm through

    Pactels introduction

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    12/20

    WHY CDMA (Cont.)

    REVIEW THE HISTORY Because of having a new high

    capacity system as quick as possible,

    only allowed one company to developthe system

    Pactel asked FCC to approve a requestto buy Qualcomm but was rejected

    Before CDMA became a standard,Qualcomm wrote a CAI (common airinterface). Most big venders boughtit

    Pactel deployed CDMA in Jan.1995 in

    LA with a poor performance

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    13/20

    Why CDMA (Cont. )

    REVIEW THE HISTORY ( cont.)

    In 1992 Korea named CDMA its

    national standard system Jan. 1996 Korean deployed its CDMA

    Sept. 1996 Korean reached 1Mcustomers

    Korea made CDMA work and savedCDMA

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    14/20

    3G WAS BORN in 1997

    In 1997 Ericsson and DoCoMo startedpromote 3G

    In 1998, ITU received 12 Proposed systems.OHG suggested to reduce to 3 WCDMA: European version, Adapted CDMA

    with a bandwidth of 5MHz using FDD

    CDMA 2000, North America version, usedCDMA with 3x 1.25 MHz bandwidth UsingFDD

    UTRA-TDD/TD-SCDMA: adapted CDMA witha bandwidth of 5 MHz or 1.6MHz using TDD

    Three standard groups were formed

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    15/20

    3G System

    REVIEW THE HISTORY Too hurry to choose the technology

    CDMA is a powerful technology forvoice communications but not for

    high speed data Standard body could not finish a spec.

    earlier due to the dispute caused bythe protection of each companysown interest

    Multimedia applications demanded bythe users started from 2002

    WiMax s OFDM can meet the highspeed data requirement

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    16/20

    3Gs Current Situation

    India decides to go directly to 4G

    China are evaluating its TD-SCDMA

    In high speed data transmission, CDMA cannot compete with OFDM

    Use of CDMA needs to pay a high IPR fee

    TD-SCDMAs performance is not as good asthe other two 3Gs due to its started behind

    A 4G forum was formed by Samsung in 2003

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    17/20

    B3G (Beyond 3G)

    WiFi and WiMAX are the B3G systems

    Using OFDM technology

    Intel announced WiMAX chip will beimbedded in PC in 2007 and inhandset in 2008

    WiBro, Korean version of WiMAX has

    been deployed in Korea Sprint-Nextel announced to trial

    WiMAX in 2007 and deploy in 2008

    WiMAX may be an interim system of a

    4G system

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    18/20

    Changing the Paradigm

    Technology Centric

    Operators

    A system design

    Static applications

    Limited coverage

    Protected system(walled garden)

    Service centric

    Users

    A common platformdesign

    Dynamic applications

    Ubiquitous

    Open architecture

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    19/20

    4G - The Future Technology

    Requirement based on ITU 1 Gbps data speed when stationary

    100 Mbps data speed when moving

    Search for 4G technology Meeting the requirement with minimum

    bandwidth will be the winner

    Users Expectation Multimedia application

    Operating with long hours

    Become a personal mobile office if possible

  • 7/30/2019 Tien Forum 2-18-07

    20/20

    Conclusion Handsets development went thru an

    uneasy and shaky past AT&T did not receive any IPR fee by

    developing car phones but Motoroladid

    TDMA was the first digital system. Itcan not compete with CDMA for voicecapacity nor compete with OFDM forhigh speed data transmission

    3G may not be a worldwide system.It has lost its timing

    B3G will be the interim system for 4G

    4G may satisfy the users as apersonal mobile office