sdf-ln41

4

Click here to load reader

Upload: science2010

Post on 30-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sdf-ln41

8/14/2019 Sdf-ln41

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sdf-ln41 1/4

Page 2: Sdf-ln41

8/14/2019 Sdf-ln41

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sdf-ln41 2/4

On the other hand, a number n is called simple number if theproduct of its proper divisors is less than or equal to n . Generallyspeaking, n has the form: n = p, or p2 , or p3 , or pq, where p andq are distinct primes. Professor F. Smarandache [1] also asked us tostudy this sequence. Let A be the set of all the simple number. In thispaper, we study the mean value of the Smarandache double factorialfunction, and give a sharp asymptotic formula. That is, we shall provethe following:

Theorem If x ≥ 2, then for any positive integer k we have

n An ≤x

df (n ) =x 2

log x52 + p

1 p2 +

k−1

m =1

cm

logm x + Ox 2

logk +1 x ,

where p

denotes the summation over all prime numbers, and cm (m =

1, 2, · · · , k − 1) are computable constants.

§2. Proof of the Theorem

In this section, we complete the proof of the Theorem.

It is obvious that df ( p) = p, df (2 p) = 2 p, df ( pq) = max { p,q}, if p = q and p, q = 2. Also we have df ( pα ) ≤ (2α − 1) p. Then we have

n An ≤x

df (n ) = p≤x

df ( p) + p2 ≤x

df ( p2 ) + p3 ≤x

df ( p3 ) + pq≤x p= q

df ( pq)

= p≤x

p + 3 p≤x

12

p + 5 p≤x

13

p + pq≤x p= q

df ( pq). (1)

Leta (n ) = 1, if n is prime;

0, otherwise ,then for any positive integer k we have

n ≤y

a (n ) = π (y) =y

log y1 +

k−1

m =1

m !logm y

+ Oy

logk +1 y. (2)

2

Page 3: Sdf-ln41

8/14/2019 Sdf-ln41

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sdf-ln41 3/4

By Abel’s identity we have

p≤y

p =n ≤y

a (n )n = π (y)y − y

2π (t )dt

=y2

log y1 +

k−1

m =1

m !logm y

+ O (y2

logk +1 y)

− y

2

tlog t

+k−1

m =1

m !tlogm +1 t

+ Ot

logk +1 tdt

=y2

log y12

+k−1

m =1

a m

logm y+ O

y2

logk +1 y. (3)

Then from (1) and (3) we have

n An ≤x

df (n ) =x 2

log x12

+k−1

m =1

a m

logm x+

pq≤x p= q

df ( pq) + Ox 2

logk +1 x. (4)

On the other hand, by (3) we have

pq≤x p= q

df ( pq) = 22<q ≤x

df (2q) + pq≤x p= q

p, q=2

df ( pq)

= 42<q ≤x

q + 22<p ≤√x

p2<q<p

+22<p ≤√x p<q ≤x

p

q −2<p ≤√x 2<q ≤√x

df ( pq)

=x 2

log x2 +

k−1

m =1

4a m

logm x+ 2

2<p ≤√x p<q ≤x

p

q + Ox 2

logk +1 x.

That is to say,

n An ≤x

df (n ) =x 2

log x52 +

k−1

m =1

5a m

logm x + 22<p ≤√x p<q ≤x

p

q + Ox 2

logk +1 x . (5)

From (3) we also have

22<p ≤√x p<q ≤x

p

q = 22<p ≤√x

x 2

p2 log x p

12

+k−1

m =1

a m

logm x p

+ Ox 2

p2 logk +1 x p

−p2

log p12

+k−1

m =1

a m

logm x p

+ Op2

logk +1 p.

3

Page 4: Sdf-ln41

8/14/2019 Sdf-ln41

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sdf-ln41 4/4

Noting that

1log x

p=

1

log x 1 − log plog x

=1

log x1 +

log plog x

+log2 plog2 x

+ · · · ,

then we have

22<p ≤√x p<q ≤x

p

q = 22<p ≤√x

x 2

p2 log x1 +

l=1

logl p

logl x

×12

+k−1

m =1

a m

logm x1 +

l=1

logl p

logl x

m

+ Ox 2

p2 log x+ O

p2

log p

=x 2

log x p

1 p2 +

k−1

m =1

bm

logm x+ O

x 2

logk +1 x, (6)

so from (5) and (6) we get

n An ≤x

df (n ) = p≤x

df ( p) + p2 ≤x

df ( p2 ) + p3 ≤x

df ( p3 ) + pq≤x p= q

df ( pq)

= p

≤x

p + 3 p

≤x

12

p + 5 p

≤x

13

p + pq

≤x

p= q

df ( pq). (7)

This completes the proof of the Theorem.

References

[1] F.Smarandache. Only problems, not Solutions. Chicago: Xi-quan Publ. House, 1993.

[2] C.Dumitrescu and V.Seleacu. Some notions and questions inNumber Theory. Glendale: Erhus Univ. Press, 1994.

[3] Felice Russo. A set of new Smarandache functions, sequencesand conjectures in number theory. American Research Press, 2000.

[4] Felice Russo. Five properties of the Smarandache Double Fac-torial Function. Smarandache Notions Journal, 2002, 13: 183-185.

4