liverbeads™: a practical and relevant in vitro model for gene … · 2010. 6. 15. · dmd #33753...

29
DMD #33753 1 Liverbeads™: a practical and relevant in vitro model for gene induction investigations Ihab Al Khansa, Olivier Blanck, André Guillouzo and Rémi Bars Bayer Cropscience, Toxicologie Recherche, Sophia-Antipolis, France (IAK, RB, OB) ; Inserm UMR 991, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Rennes, France (IAK, AG) ; Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (IAK, AG). DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as doi:10.1124/dmd.110.033753 Copyright 2010 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753 at ASPET Journals on June 18, 2021 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from

Upload: others

Post on 02-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • DMD #33753

    1

    Liverbeads™: a practical and relevant in vitro model for gene induction investigations

    Ihab Al Khansa, Olivier Blanck, André Guillouzo and Rémi Bars

    Bayer Cropscience, Toxicologie Recherche, Sophia-Antipolis, France (IAK, RB, OB) ; Inserm

    UMR 991, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Rennes, France (IAK, AG) ;

    Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (IAK, AG).

    DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as doi:10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    Copyright 2010 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    2

    Running title: CYP and UGT genes inducibility in rat Liverbeads™

    Corresponding author:

    Olivier Blanck, BayerCropscience, Toxicologie Recherche, B.P. 153, 06903 Sophia-

    Antipolis, France. Tel.: +33-(0)492943441, Fax: +33-(0)493958454.

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Number of text pages: 24

    Number of tables: 2

    Number of figures: 3

    Number of references: 40

    Number of words in Abstract: 239

    Number of words in Introduction: 518

    Number of words in Discussion: 1137

    Abbreviations used are: AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; BNF, beta-naphthoflavone; CAR,

    constitutive androstane receptor; CLO, clofibric acid; CTM, clotrimazole; P450, cytochrome

    P450; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; FCS, fetal calf serum; PB, phenobarbital; PCN, pregnenolone

    16α-carbonitrile; PHE, phenytoin; PPARα, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha;

    PXR, pregnane X receptor; UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    3

    Abstract

    Cryopreserved rat hepatocytes entrapped within an alginate matrix commercially

    available as Liverbeads™, were evaluated for their relevance as a screening tool for gene

    induction in vitro, using qRT-PCR. They were treated with the reference compounds beta-

    naphthoflavone (BNF), phenobarbital (PB), pregnenolone 16α-carbonitrile (PCN) and clofibric

    acid (CLO) and analyzed for mRNA levels of Cyp1a1, Cyp2b1, Cyp3a1, Cyp4a1, Ugt1a6 and

    Ugt2b1. In addition, for PB and PCN, the results were compared with those obtained in rat liver

    in vivo. For each inducer the gene induction profiles obtained with the Liverbeads™ in vitro

    model were time- and dose- dependent. The in vitro gene expression profiles confirmed the

    corresponding known P450 and UGT induction by each reference compound. Specifically, the

    most strongly induced genes were Cyp1a1 by BNF, Cyp2b1 by PB, Cyp3a1 and Ugt2b1 by PCN

    and Cyp4a1 and Cyp2b1 by CLO. Other genes investigated were also induced by the reference

    compounds but the expression levels were lower and increases were seen only after prolonged

    treatment. Specifically, Ugt1a6 and Cyp2b1 were increased by BNF, Cyp1a1, Cyp3a1 and

    Ugt2b1 by PB and Cyp3a1 and Ugt2b1 by CLO. All these results correlated well with published

    in vitro data and our in vivo data. In conclusion, our results suggest that Liverbeads™ is a

    relevant and useful in vitro screening tool for determining gene induction profiles of new

    molecules. In addition, as Liverbeads™ from different species are available, this tool offers the

    possibility to conduct interspecies comparisons.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    4

    Introduction

    Research and development of new chemicals is costly and time-consuming, which makes

    the identification of potential toxicity for new chemical entities critical during the early phase of

    their development. Hepatotoxicity is a very important cause of drug development arrest.

    Chemical-induced changes in the level of expression of cytochrome P450 (P450) and other drug

    metabolizing genes can be indicators of liver tumor formation in rodents (Whysner et al., 1996)

    and are a key cause of drug-drug interactions. Hepatocyte-based screening in toxicology is

    largely used in order to reduce animal use and compounds development costs. Fresh and

    cryopreserved hepatocytes have long been considered as the most suitable in vitro model system

    for metabolism and toxicity studies. However, since rat primary hepatocyte monolayers exhibit a

    rapid decline in their P450 activities, various 2D (sandwich configuration for example) and 3D

    culture conditions have been proposed to improve both cell survival and metabolic competence

    (Guillouzo, 1998; Chia et al., 2000; Hewitt et al., 2007). 3D models are receiving growing

    interest; among them gel entrapment offers the advantage of being highly protective during the

    freeze/thaw process (Guyomard et al., 1996; Rialland et al., 2000). Indeed, after thawing

    hepatocyte viability is only slightly decreased and P450 activities remain expressed at levels

    comparable to those measured in primary hepatocyte monolayer cultures. Commercially available

    as Liverbeads™, alginate-entrapped hepatocytes from various species are a ready to use

    laboratory reagent, immediately available to laboratories without requiring any particular

    expertise in hepatocytes isolation.

    Liverbeads™ have been used for interspecies xenobiotic metabolism investigations

    (identification of metabolite structures and analysis of metabolic clearance) (Guyomard et al.,

    1996), determination of drug-metabolizing enzyme activities after xenobiotic exposure

    (Guyomard et al., 1996; Rialland et al., 2000) and evaluation of cytotoxic (Biagini et al., 2006)

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    5

    and genotoxic (Vian et al., 2002) effects of chemicals. However, their relevance as a screening

    tool for xenobiotic metabolism gene induction following treatment with chemicals has not yet

    been evaluated. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to evaluate the effects of four

    reference inducers phenobarbital (PB), beta-naphthoflavone (BNF), clofibric acid (CLO) and

    pregnenolone 16α-carbonitrile (PCN) on four major CYPs and two UGTs in cryopreserved rat

    Liverbeads™ by studying changes in mRNA levels using quantitative real-time reverse

    transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). This method is now recognized as being

    reproducible and sensitive for identifying compounds with P450 induction ability in the early

    phase of drug discovery (Goodsaid et al., 2003; Baldwin et al., 2006). The four P450s

    investigated, Cyp1a1, Cyp2b1, Cyp3a1 and Cyp4a1, are known to be mainly induced by BNF,

    PB, PCN and CLO respectively. These four inducers are ligands of the major nuclear receptors

    AhR, CAR, PXR and PPARα respectively (Lindros et al., 1998; Madan et al., 1999; Kretschmer

    and Baldwin, 2005; Tamura et al., 2006; Nishimura et al., 2007). The two UGTs, Ugt1a6 and

    Ugt2b1, are considered as the founding members of the current two evolutionarily conserved

    UGT families and are induced by AhR and CAR ligands respectively. Finally, to confirm our in

    vitro findings, rats were treated with either PB or PCN and expression profiles for the same

    P450s and UGTs were established using liver samples.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    6

    Materials and Methods

    Chemicals

    Phenobarbital (PB), beta-naphthoflavone (BNF), clofibric acid (CLO), pregnenolone 16α-

    carbonitrile (PCN), phenytoin (PHE), clotrimazole (CTM) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were

    purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Quentin-Fallavier, France). Leibovitz-L15 (L15),

    HepatoZYME-SFM media and fetal calf serum (FCS) were supplied by Invitrogen (Cergy

    Pontoise, France). All chemicals used were of the highest quality available.

    Cell culture and treatments

    Cryopreserved male Wistar Rat Liverbeads™ were purchased from Biopredic

    International (Rennes, France) and cultured according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly,

    Liverbeads™ were rapidly thawed at 37°C and then put in L15 medium containing 0.6M glucose,

    10mM Hepes, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100µg/ml streptomycin and then distributed in 12-well

    plates (0.2 ml beads in 1 ml medium per well) for 3 hours in HepatoZYME-SFM medium

    containing 10% FCS, 4 µg/ml insulin, 2mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100µg/ml

    streptomycin, at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. This medium was then replaced with the same

    medium supplemented or not with 1µM hydrocortisone hemisuccinate, deprived of FCS and

    containing the different test compounds or the vehicle. Liverbeads™ were thus exposed to 4

    different concentrations of the test compounds PB (100, 300, 1000 and 3000 µM), BNF (1, 5, 10

    and 20 µM), CLO (100, 200, 400 and 1000 µM) and PCN (1, 5, 10 and 30 µM) or to the vehicle

    control DMSO (0.2% final concentration) for 24, 48 or 72 h. Additional cultures were exposed to

    two concentrations of phenytoin (PHE) (10 and 200 µM) and clotrimazole (CTM) (2.5 and 10

    µM) for 24 and 48 h. The test compound concentrations were selected from preliminary

    cytotoxicity experiments.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    7

    In vivo dosing and experimental design

    Male Wistar Rj:WI (IOPS HAN) rats, 6 week-old, were purchased from R. Janvier (Le

    Genest St Isle, France). Animal handling and experiments were performed in accordance with

    The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Council, 1996). Each animal was

    individually housed in a stainless steel wire mesh cage under controlled environmental conditions

    and received drinking water and pelleted rodent diet (Scientific Animal Food and Engineering,

    Augy, France) ad libitum. After a 5 days acclimation and one day prior to treatment, each rat was

    assigned to a group by the stratified randomization method based upon the body weight. Animals

    (5 per group) were treated with a low (15 and 25 mg/kg/day) and a high (75 and 125 mg/kg/day)

    dose of PB and PCN respectively, by daily gavage for 7 days. Doses were chosen from literature

    (Guzelian et al., 2006; Nie et al., 2006; Slatter et al., 2006; Nioi et al., 2008). Corn oil was used as

    a vehicle for all the compounds. Clinical observations were performed daily and body weights

    and physical examinations were recorded weekly. Twenty-four hours after the last dose, all

    animals were sacrificed by isoflurane (Baxter, Maurepas, France) inhalation followed by

    exsanguination under deep anesthesia. At necropsy, small pieces of the median and the left lobes

    of the liver of each animal were collected and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to storage at

    –80°C for the purpose of these investigations.

    Total RNA isolation and quality control

    Total RNA was isolated from individual control and treated liver samples or from

    Liverbeads™ cell lysates samples using RNeasy Mini kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) in accordance

    with manufacturer’s instructions. Resulting total RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-

    1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Montchanin, DE). RNA integrity (28S/18S ratio) and purity

    were assessed using RNA 6000 nano assay LabChips® (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA)

    and analyzed on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    8

    Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis

    One (liverbeads) or ten (in vivo samples) micrograms of total RNA from control and

    treated samples were used for reverse transcription with random hexamer primers using the High

    Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the

    manufacturer’s protocol. Each sample was assayed in duplicate. qPCR reactions were performed

    using an ABI prism 7900 HT apparatus (Applied Biosystems). 1/15 (in vitro) or 1/50 (in vivo)

    diluted first-strand complementary DNA was mixed with Taqman probes (Assay on demand,

    Applied Biosystems: Cyp1a1, NM_012540.2; Cyp2b1, NM_001134844.1; Cyp3a1,

    NM_013105.1; Cyp4a1, NM_175837.1; Ugt1a6, NM_057105.3; Ugt2b1 or Udpgtr2,

    NM_173295.1) and with AmpliTaq Gold PCR Master Mix. β2 microglobulin (B2m,

    NM_012512.2) was selected as the housekeeping gene for quantitative calculations.

    For sample distribution evaluation, relative gene expression was calculated following the

    Livak and Schmittgen (2001) ΔΔCt method. Briefly, mRNA was normalized to a calibrator; in

    each case, the calibrator was a basal sample (corresponding to one animal from the vehicle-

    treated group or one control well). Final results were expressed as the n-fold difference (or RQ,

    Relative Quantity) in gene expression relative to B2m mRNA and calibrator as follows:

    n-fold = 2-(ΔCt sample- ΔCt basal), where ΔCt values of the sample and calibrator were determined by

    subtracting the average Ct value of the transcripts from the average Ct value of B2m mRNAs for

    each sample. RQ of the control sample was always equal to one. A change was considered as

    significant when RQ was above 1.5 or below 0.5.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA test with a Bonferroni post-

    hoc test. The values were expressed as mean ± SD and a p-value ≤0.05 was considered as

    statistically significant.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    9

    Results

    Steady-state RNA levels in Liverbeads during culture

    mRNA levels of Cyp1a1, Cyp2b1, Cyp3a1, Cyp4a1, Ugt1a6 and Ugt2b1 were measured

    in rat Liverbeads™ after 0, 24, 48 and 72 h of culture in a medium containing 0.2% DMSO and

    1µM hydrocortisone hemisuccinate (Fig. 1). Compared to values found just after thawing (0 h),

    those measured in 24 h cultures were either unchanged (Cyp3a1), significantly increased

    (Cyp1a1, Ugt1a6) or decreased (Cyp2b1, Cyp4a1, Ugt2b1). At 48 h, with the exception of

    Cyp4a1 mRNA which was slightly more decreased, transcript levels of all other genes were

    enhanced (Cyp2b1: 10 to 20-fold and Ugt2b1: 15 to 30-fold) and Cyp3a1 transcript levels were

    around 6-fold increased, compared to 24 h. At 72 h, for all the genes tested, the transcript levels

    were relatively unchanged (Cyp4a1) or still higher (all other genes) compared to the 48 h time

    point. Either 1µM hydrocortisone (data not shown) or 0.2% DMSO (supplemental Table 1S) had

    no influence on the levels of the transcripts whatever the gene tested and the time of culture

    Time- and concentration-dependent responsiveness of Liverbeads™ following exposure to

    reference compounds

    The effects of BNF, PB, CLO and PCN on the 6 drug metabolizing genes of interest were

    studied in Liverbeads™ after 24, 48 and 72h of exposure. Several concentrations of each

    compound were selected from preliminary experiments. The highest concentration used was

    based on either the maximum non-toxic concentration after 24 and 72 h treatment using the

    Gerlier and Thomasset (1986) XTT cytotoxicity assay (data not shown) or the maximum soluble

    concentration. One batch of Liverbeads™ was used in triplicate. The maximum inductions of

    various CYP and UGT transcript levels observed as a function of time or as a function of

    concentration (at a chosen time point where the highest inductions were observed) are

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    10

    summarized in Table 1A and Table 1B, respectively. All corresponding data with means and SDs

    are displayed in the supplemental Table 2S.

    BNF strongly induced Cyp1a1 mRNA levels (Table 1A and 1B) in a concentration-

    dependent manner and maximum induction was observed after a 24h exposure with 10µM. In

    addition Ugt1a6 and Cyp2b1 transcripts were also moderately increased, not exceeding 3-fold,

    with the exception of Cyp2b1 which was increased 7-fold after 72h with the highest BNF

    concentration (20µM). No noticeable changes were observed for the three other genes.

    PB induced a strong increase in Cyp2b1 mRNA levels (Table 1A and 1B). This increase

    was already high after a 24h treatment with the lowest concentration (100 µM) and the highest

    fold-change reached 200 at 48 hr with 3000µM. PB also induced, but to a lower extent, Ugt2b1,

    Cyp1a1 and Cyp3a1 mRNA levels, mainly after 48 and 72h. Other genes were either unchanged

    (Ugt1a6) or even decreased (Cyp4a1 at 72 h).

    CLO mainly induced Cyp4a1 gene (Table 1A and 1B). A concentration- and time-

    dependent increase in mRNA levels was observed, with the highest values reached at 48 hr (65-

    fold with 400µM). CLO also strongly increased Cyp2b1 transcripts in a concentration-dependent

    manner, changes reaching around 12-fold after 24 or 48h and 23-fold after 72 h in the presence of

    400µM. In addition Cyp3a1 was slightly increased (2 to 4-fold) dose-dependently after 72 h

    treatment. Cyp1a1 and Ugt1a6 mRNA levels were unchanged and Ugt2b1 expression was

    decreased starting 48 h.

    PCN mainly induced Cyp3a1 and Ugt2b1 in a concentration- and time-dependent manner

    (Table 1A and 1B). The highest values were obtained with 10µM after 72 h and did not exceed 4-

    fold. No obvious changes were recorded for the transcript levels of Cyp1a1, Cyp2b1 and Ugt1a6

    and those of Cyp4a1 were slightly decreased after 48 and 72 h treatment.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    11

    The reproducibility of the responsiveness of Liverbeads™ batches to reference inducers

    was confirmed by treating 3 other different Liverbeads™ batches with two concentrations of PB

    (100 and 1000 µM) and PCN (2 and 10 µM) for 24, 48 and 72h. The data displayed in Figure 2

    mostly confirmed those obtained with the original batch (Table 1A and 1B). Indeed, Cyp2b1

    transcripts were strongly induced by PB in a time-dependent manner with the levels being

    slightly higher with 1000µM versus 100µM. Cyp1a1, Cyp3a1 and Ugt2b1 were also induced but

    to a much lower extent than Cyp2b1 and usually only after 48 and 72h of treatment with the

    1000µM PB concentration. The initial results obtained with PCN (Table 1) were confirmed (Fig

    2B). A limited but significant increase in Cyp3a1 and Ugt2b1 was observed as early as 24 h after

    exposure to 2 and 10µM PCN. In addition, Cyp2b1 was also increased but only after 24 h

    treatment. Ugt1a6 remained unchanged and Cyp4a1 expression was decreased after exposure to

    10µM PCN for 48 and 72h. No change in the fold-inductions was observed in Liverbeads™

    cultured in hydrocortisone-free medium compared to in the presence of hydrocortisone with the

    exception of Cyp3a1 which was slightly more increased (2- versus 1.5-fold) in the presence of

    hormone (data not shown).

    The responsiveness of Liverbeads™ to known inducers which are modulators of CAR

    and PXR was confirmed by treatment with PHE and CTM for 24 and 48 h. PHE was used at 10

    and 200µM and CTM at 2.5 and 10µM. The data, displayed in Table 2, showed that the effects of

    these two inducers were very close to those obtained with their corresponding CAR and PXR

    ligands, PB and PCN, respectively. They induced the same P450s and UGT to a similar extent in

    a dose-dependent manner.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    12

    Finally, to determine whether Liverbeads™ are representative of the in vivo liver for

    xenobiotic gene induction screening, rats were also treated with two doses of PB and PCN by

    daily gavage for 7 days (Fig. 3). As shown in Figure 3A, at the low dose of 15mg/kg, PB

    significantly induced only the two most sensitive genes, Cyp2b1 and Ugt2b1, while at 75mg/kg

    the expression of three additional genes, Cyp1a1, Cyp3a1 and Ugt1a6, was increased. These in

    vivo results correlated well with the in vitro findings (Table 1A and 1B and Fig. 2A) as the most

    sensitive genes in vitro were also Cyp2b1 and Ugt2b1. Moreover the induction was dose-

    dependent as the fold-inductions of Cyp2b1 and Ugt2b1 reached 180 and 85 with the highest

    dose versus 75 and 30 with the lower dose, respectively. At the lowest dose of 25mg/kg, PCN

    significantly increased both Cyp3a1 and Ugt2b1 (Fig. 3B), as was seen in vitro. Only a slight

    additional increase was observed with the dose of 125mg/kg. A 4- and 2-fold increase of Cyp1a1

    and Cyp2b1 respectively was also observed while the 2 other genes (Cyp4a1 and Ugt1a6)

    remained unchanged.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    13

    Discussion

    It is well established that P450 expression and activity rapidly decline in conventional

    hepatocyte monolayers, resulting in a low biotransformation of xenobiotics and in the loss of

    responsiveness to some metabolic enzyme inducers, especially PB (Su and Waxman, 2004;

    Nishimura et al., 2007). The loss of P450 expression and activity does not affect all P450s in the

    same way and even a transient increase of Cyp1a1 has been observed (Wortelboer et al., 1990).

    Phase 2 enzymes undergo a similar loss (Kern et al., 1997). Although a less rapid decline in P450

    performance is observed in rat hepatocytes maintained in the 2D sandwich configuration

    (Schuetz et al., 1988; De Smet et al., 2001; Sidhu et al., 2004), there are limitations to such

    extracellular matrix-based sandwich cultures. These limitations are due to mass transfer barriers

    and the fact that protocols for RNA and protein extraction from such cultures are either time-

    consuming or contain steps that may skew the results. We show here that, contrary to rat

    hepatocytes in monolayers or in a sandwich configuration, alginate-entrapped rat hepatocytes

    exhibited a slight or marked increase in transcript levels for most CYP (with the exception of

    Cyp4a1 which showed a decrease then stabilized) and UGT genes tested between 24 and 72 h in

    control culture conditions, indicating that in this configuration cryopreserved rat hepatocytes

    maintained a good expression of genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism.

    Several studies have shown that cryopreservation does not alter levels of total cytochrome

    P450 and phase 1 enzyme activities when measured shortly after thawing in hepatocytes plated in

    conventional monolayer or in a sandwich configuration (Chesne et al., 1993; Madan et al., 1999)

    or immobilized in alginate gels (Rialland et al., 2000). However changes in the levels of

    corresponding mRNAs usually occur early and are much more drastic in conventional monolayer

    compared to Liverbeads™. Therefore the fact that cryopreserved alginate-entrapped hepatocytes

    showed increased mRNA levels between 24 and 72 h of culture and were strongly responsive to

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    14

    most of the reference inducers tested is of major importance for metabolism gene induction

    investigations.

    Indeed, consistent with previous studies in vivo (Heuman et al., 1982; Wrighton et al.,

    1985; Baldwin et al., 2006) and in vitro (Kocarek et al., 1995; Meredith et al., 2003), a marked

    increase was observed in mRNA levels of induced P450s after treatment with corresponding

    reference inducers. BNF was an effective inducer of Cyp1a1 and Ugt1a6; PB of Cyp2b1, Ugt2b1

    and Cyp3a1; PCN of Cyp3a1 and Ugt2b1 and CLO of Cyp4a1. Induction of Cyp3a1 by PB and

    Cyp2b1 by PCN can be explained by the crosstalk between the nuclear receptors CAR and PXR

    (Moore et al., 2000; Pascussi et al., 2008). In addition, in agreement with other reports,

    transcripts of additional CYPs were found to be increased in Liverbeads™ but usually only after

    prolonged treatment and at a lower extent compared to the major P450s. For example, we

    observed an increase in mRNA levels of Cyp2b1 with BNF and CLO which was coherent with

    previously published data (Richert et al., 2003; Richert et al., 2009). The slight increase of

    Cyp1a1 by PHE could be related to its PB-like properties. Some discrepancies were also noticed.

    Thus, Cyp1a1 was induced by PCN in rat liver but the fold induction was low and observed after

    7 days of treatment with the highest dose (125mg/kg). Likely, small fold-inductions of drug

    metabolizing enzymes, occurring in vitro or in vivo after several days of exposure and usually

    with high chemical doses, involved different mechanisms than those implicated in the induction

    of early responsive genes.

    The maximum fold induction of individual P450 genes varied greatly reaching for

    example 200-fold for Cyp2b1 with PB, 65-fold for Cyp4a1 with CLO, 14-fold for Cyp1a1 with

    BNF and 2-fold for Cyp3a1 with PCN. However it must be borne in mind that Cyp1a1, for

    example, is constitutively expressed at extremely low levels in the rat liver and that among the

    various parameters that can modulate the responsiveness of P450s (Burczynski et al., 2001), their

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    15

    basal level is a critical parameter. The highest fold inductions are usually observed when basal

    values are low (Guillouzo and Guguen-Guillouzo, 2008). Only Cyp3a1 exhibited a limited fold

    induction level, not exceeding 2-fold and lower than the values found in other hepatocyte culture

    models (Kocarek et al., 1995; Meredith et al., 2003). However the increase was statistically

    significant after treatment with both PCN and CTM. It is interesting to note that this P450 was

    the most stable during the first 24h. The slightly higher fold-induction of Cyp3a1 in

    hydrocortisone-free medium could reflect a slight induction effect of this hormone on this P450

    without any chemical treatment. An important finding was the very good reproducibility of the

    data between the different batches of Liverbeads making this model an appropriate in vitro model

    for xenobiotic gene induction studies.

    Several studies have reported induction by DMSO of several P450s, especially the

    CYP3A subfamily, in both primary hepatocytes (LeCluyse et al., 2000; Su and Waxman, 2004;

    Lin, 2006) and hepatoma cell lines (Aninat et al., 2006). Although most effects were obtained

    with a 2% DMSO concentration, some increase was also evidenced with concentrations as low as

    0.1% in primary human hepatocytes (LeCluyse et al., 2000). In the present study we did not

    observe any significant effect of DMSO in the transcript levels of all P450s tested in the presence

    of 0.2% DMSO. A likely explanation is that we used rat hepatocytes and that the basal P450

    levels are better preserved in Liverbeads™ than in primary hepatocyte cultures.

    Our in vitro results with the Liverbeads™ model were in line with our in vivo studies with

    PB and PCN which are in agreement with previous in vivo studies in which similar dose levels

    were used and similar P450 induction profiles obtained (Wyde et al., 2003; Guzelian et al., 2006;

    Slatter et al., 2006). Indeed, PB and PCN significantly induced Cyp2b1 and Ugt2b1, and Cyp3a1

    and Ugt2b1 respectively, in both situations. Consequently, although it would be of interest to

    analyze more P450s, such as the main constitutively expressed Cyp2c11 and Cyp3a2 and phase II

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    16

    enzymes, it may be concluded that our results exhibit striking similarity in the expression profiles

    of genes encoding for the major inducible xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes between the

    Liverbeads™ model and the liver in vivo.

    In conclusion our results show that Liverbeads™ represent a suitable model system for

    investigating P450 and UGT induction by xenobiotics. This model presents several major

    advantages over other hepatocyte culture models. It is an attractive procedure for banking

    hepatocytes in large yields and for their transportation. Liverbeads™ are easy to handle and

    respond to reference inducers after long-term storage in liquid nitrogen. Since hepatocytes from

    various species can be entrapped in alginate gels, this model offers a unique approach for

    interspecies comparison of gene expression changes induced by drugs, pesticides and other

    chemicals.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    17

    Acknowledgments:

    This work was partially financed by “Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la

    Technologie” (ANRT) which granted a PhD scholarship to Ihab Al Khansa. The authors thank Dr

    Helen Tinwell for helpful comments and critical reading of the manuscript, and Muriel Totis,

    Agnès Arnaud, Marie-Pierre Côme and Claire Guyomard for their help and useful advice.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    18

    References

    Aninat C, Piton A, Glaise D, Le Charpentier T, Langouet S, Morel F, Guguen-Guillouzo C and

    Guillouzo A (2006) Expression of cytochromes P450, conjugating enzymes and nuclear receptors in human hepatoma HepaRG cells. Drug Metab Dispos 34:75-83.

    Baldwin SJ, Bramhall JL, Ashby CA, Yue L, Murdock PR, Hood SR, Ayrton AD and Clarke SE (2006) Cytochrome P450 gene induction in rats ex vivo assessed by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan). Drug Metab Dispos 34:1063-1069.

    Biagini CP, Boissel E, Borde F, Bender VE, Bouskila M, Blazy F, Nicaise L, Mignot A, Cassio D and Chevalier S (2006) Investigation of the hepatotoxicity profile of chemical entities using Liverbeads and WIF-B9 in vitro models. Toxicol In Vitro 20:1051-1059.

    Burczynski ME, McMillian M, Parker JB, Bryant S, Leone A, Grant ER, Thorne JM, Zhong Z, Zivin RA and Johnson MD (2001) Cytochrome P450 Induction in Rat Hepatocytes Assessed by Quantitative Real-Time Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction and the RNA Invasive Cleavage Assay. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 29:1243-1250.

    Chesne C, Guyomard C, Fautrel A, Poullain MG, Fremond B, De Jong H and Guillouzo A (1993) Viability and function in primary culture of adult hepatocytes from various animal species and human beings after cryopreservation. Hepatology 18:406-414.

    Chia SM, Leong KW, Li J, Xu X, Zeng K, Er PN, Gao S and Yu H (2000) Hepatocyte encapsulation for enhanced cellular functions. Tissue Eng 6:481-495.

    De Smet K, Loyer P, Gilot D, Vercruysse A, Rogiers V and Guguen-Guillouzo C (2001) Effects of epidermal growth factor on CYP inducibility by xenobiotics, DNA replication, and caspase activations in collagen I gel sandwich cultures of rat hepatocytes. Biochem Pharmacol 61:1293-1303.

    Goodsaid FM, Palamanda JR, Montgomery D, Mandakas G, Gu C, Li Z, You X, Norton L, Smith R, Chu I, Soares T, Alton K, Kishnani NS and Rosenblum IY (2003) Assessment of temporal biochemical and gene transcription changes in rat liver cytochrome P450: utility of real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Pharm Res 20:1373-1380.

    Guillouzo A (1998) Liver cell models in in vitro toxicology. Environ Health Perspect 106 Suppl 2:511-532.

    Guillouzo A and Guguen-Guillouzo C (2008) Evolving concepts in liver tissue modeling and implications for in vitro toxicology. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4:1279-1294.

    Guyomard C, Rialland L, Fremond B, Chesne C and Guillouzo A (1996) Influence of alginate gel entrapment and cryopreservation on survival and xenobiotic metabolism capacity of rat hepatocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 141:349-356.

    Guzelian J, Barwick JL, Hunter L, Phang TL, Quattrochi LC and Guzelian PS (2006) Identification of genes controlled by the pregnane X receptor by microarray analysis of mRNAs from pregnenolone 16alpha-carbonitrile-treated rats. Toxicol Sci 94:379-387.

    Heuman DM, Gallagher EJ, Barwick JL, Elshourbagy NA and Guzelian PS (1982) Immunochemical evidence for induction of a common form of hepatic cytochrome P-450 in rats treated with pregnenolone-16 alpha-carbonitrile or other steroidal or non-steroidal agents. Mol Pharmacol 21:753-760.

    Hewitt NJ, Lechon MJ, Houston JB, Hallifax D, Brown HS, Maurel P, Kenna JG, Gustavsson L, Lohmann C, Skonberg C, Guillouzo A, Tuschl G, Li AP, LeCluyse E, Groothuis GM and Hengstler JG (2007) Primary hepatocytes: current understanding of the regulation of

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    19

    metabolic enzymes and transporter proteins, and pharmaceutical practice for the use of hepatocytes in metabolism, enzyme induction, transporter, clearance, and hepatotoxicity studies. Drug Metab Rev 39:159-234.

    Kern A, Bader A, Pichlmayr R and Sewing KF (1997) Drug metabolism in hepatocyte sandwich cultures of rats and humans. Biochem Pharmacol 54:761-772.

    Kocarek TA, Schuetz EG, Strom SC, Fisher RA and Guzelian PS (1995) Comparative analysis of cytochrome P4503A induction in primary cultures of rat, rabbit, and human hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 23:415-421.

    Kretschmer XC and Baldwin WS (2005) CAR and PXR: xenosensors of endocrine disrupters? Chem Biol Interact 155:111-128.

    LeCluyse E, Madan A, Hamilton G, Carroll K, DeHaan R and Parkinson A (2000) Expression and regulation of cytochrome P450 enzymes in primary cultures of human hepatocytes. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 14:177-188.

    Lin JH (2006) CYP induction-mediated drug interactions: in vitro assessment and clinical implications. Pharm Res 23:1089-1116.

    Lindros KO, Oinonen T, Kettunen E, Sippel H, Muro-Lupori C and Koivusalo M (1998) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-associated genes in rat liver: Regional coinduction of aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 and glutathione transferase Ya. Biochemical Pharmacology 55:413.

    Madan A, DeHaan R, Mudra D, Carroll K, LeCluyse E and Parkinson A (1999) Effect of cryopreservation on cytochrome P-450 enzyme induction in cultured rat hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 27:327-335.

    Meredith C, Scott MP, Renwick AB, Price RJ and Lake BG (2003) Studies on the induction of rat hepatic CYP1A, CYP2B, CYP3A and CYP4A subfamily form mRNAs in vivo and in vitro using precision-cut rat liver slices. Xenobiotica 33:511-527.

    Moore LB, Parks DJ, Jones SA, Bledsoe RK, Consler TG, Stimmel JB, Goodwin B, Liddle C, Blanchard SG, Willson TM, Collins JL and Kliewer SA (2000) Orphan nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor share xenobiotic and steroid ligands. J Biol Chem 275:15122-15127.

    Nie AY, McMillian M, Parker JB, Leone A, Bryant S, Yieh L, Bittner A, Nelson J, Carmen A, Wan J and Lord PG (2006) Predictive toxicogenomics approaches reveal underlying molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity. Mol Carcinog 45:914-933.

    Nioi P, Pardo ID, Sherratt PJ and Snyder RD (2008) Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute dosing. Chem Biol Interact 172:206-215.

    Nishimura M, Koeda A, Suganuma Y, Suzuki E, Shimizu T, Nakayama M, Satoh T, Narimatsu S and Naito S (2007) Comparison of inducibility of CYP1A and CYP3A mRNAs by prototypical inducers in primary cultures of human, cynomolgus monkey, and rat hepatocytes. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 22:178-186.

    Pascussi JM, Gerbal-Chaloin S, Duret C, Daujat-Chavanieu M, Vilarem MJ and Maurel P (2008) The tangle of nuclear receptors that controls xenobiotic metabolism and transport: crosstalk and consequences. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 48:1-32.

    Rialland L, Guyomard C, Scotte M, Chesne C and Guillouzo A (2000) Viability and drug metabolism capacity of alginate-entrapped hepatocytes after cryopreservation. Cell Biol Toxicol 16:105-116.

    Richert L, Lamboley C, Viollon-Abadie C, Grass P, Hartmann N, Laurent S, Heyd B, Mantion G, Chibout SD and Staedtler F (2003) Effects of clofibric acid on mRNA expression profiles

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    20

    in primary cultures of rat, mouse and human hepatocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 191:130-146.

    Richert L, Tuschl G, Abadie C, Blanchard N, Pekthong D, Mantion G, Weber JC and Mueller SO (2009) Use of mRNA expression to detect the induction of drug metabolising enzymes in rat and human hepatocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 235:86-96.

    Schuetz EG, Li D, Omiecinski CJ, Muller-Eberhard U, Kleinman HK, Elswick B and Guzelian PS (1988) Regulation of gene expression in adult rat hepatocytes cultured on a basement membrane matrix. J Cell Physiol 134:309-323.

    Sidhu JS, Liu F and Omiecinski CJ (2004) Phenobarbital responsiveness as a uniquely sensitive indicator of hepatocyte differentiation status: requirement of dexamethasone and extracellular matrix in establishing the functional integrity of cultured primary rat hepatocytes. Exp Cell Res 292:252-264.

    Slatter JG, Cheng O, Cornwell PD, de Souza A, Rockett J, Rushmore T, Hartley D, Evers R, He Y, Dai X, Hu R, Caguyong M, Roberts CJ, Castle J and Ulrich RG (2006) Microarray-based compendium of hepatic gene expression profiles for prototypical ADME gene-inducing compounds in rats and mice in vivo. Xenobiotica 36:902-937.

    Su T and Waxman DJ (2004) Impact of dimethyl sulfoxide on expression of nuclear receptors and drug-inducible cytochromes P450 in primary rat hepatocytes. Arch Biochem Biophys 424:226-234.

    Tamura K, Ono A, Miyagishima T, Nagao T and Urushidani T (2006) Profiling of gene expression in rat liver and rat primary cultured hepatocytes treated with peroxisome proliferators. J Toxicol Sci 31:471-490.

    Vian L, Yusuf A, Guyomard C and Cano JP (2002) The Liverbeads as a tool for the comet assay. Mutat Res 519:163-170.

    Whysner J, Ross PM and Williams GM (1996) Phenobarbital mechanistic data and risk assessment: enzyme induction, enhanced cell proliferation, and tumor promotion. Pharmacol Ther 71:153-191.

    Wortelboer HM, de Kruif CA, van Iersel AA, Falke HE, Noordhoek J and Blaauboer BJ (1990) The isoenzyme pattern of cytochrome P450 in rat hepatocytes in primary culture, comparing different enzyme activities in microsomal incubations and in intact monolayers. Biochem Pharmacol 40:2525-2534.

    Wrighton SA, Schuetz EG, Watkins PB, Maurel P, Barwick J, Bailey BS, Hartle HT, Young B and Guzelian P (1985) Demonstration in multiple species of inducible hepatic cytochromes P-450 and their mRNAs related to the glucocorticoid-inducible cytochrome P-450 of the rat. Mol Pharmacol 28:312-321.

    Wyde ME, Bartolucci E, Ueda A, Zhang H, Yan B, Negishi M and You L (2003) The environmental pollutant 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl)ethylene induces rat hepatic cytochrome P450 2B and 3A expression through the constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor. Mol Pharmacol 64:474-481.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    21

    Figure Legends

    Figure 1: mRNA levels of Cyp1a1, Cyp2b1, Cyp3a1, Cyp4a1, Ugt1a6 and Ugt2b1 in rat

    Liverbeads™ after 0, 24, 48 and 72 h in culture in a medium containing 0.2% DMSO.

    Experiments were performed in triplicate using three different batches of Liverbeads™ except for

    0 h where only one batch was used. The values are mean ± SD; 24 h values were set up arbitrarily

    to 1 and were used as the reference group was used for comparisons. *: p ≤0.05; **: p ≤0.01.

    Figure 2: Dose and time effects of PB (A) and PCN (B) exposure on the mRNA levels of

    Cyp1a1, Cyp2b1, Cyp3a1, Cyp4a1, Ugt1a6 and Ugt2b1 in rat Liverbeads™ cultures.

    Experiments were performed in triplicates using three different batches of rat Liverbeads™, and

    the values are as mean ± SD (n=3). For each time-point, comparisons were made to the

    corresponding untreated cultures. *: p ≤0.05; **: p ≤0.01; ***: p ≤0.005.

    Figure 3: Dose effects of PB (A) and PCN (B) exposure on the mRNA levels of Cyp1a1,

    Cyp2b1, Cyp3a1, Cyp4a1, Ugt1a6 and Ugt2b1 in rat livers. Gene expression was analyzed

    from 5 different rat livers per treatment group, and the values are shown as mean ± SD (n=5).

    Doses are in mg/kg/day. Comparisons were made to the corresponding untreated livers. *: p

    ≤0.01; **: p ≤0.005; ***: p ≤0.001.

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    22

    Tables

    Table 1A: Maximum induction of various CYPs and UGTs by prototypical inducers in

    Liverbeads™ as a function of time in culture. Four concentrations were investigated for each

    compound: PB (100, 300, 1000 and 3000 µM), BNF (1, 5, 10 and 20 µM), CLO (100, 200, 400

    and 1000 µM) and PCN (1, 5, 10 and 30 µM). Maximum fold inductions, obtained with the

    highest concentrations used, are given for each time-point. Fold inductions were arbitrarily set as

    follows: between 2 and 5: +; 5 and 10: ++; > 10: +++; *: decreased values (< 1) and -: no change.

    Compound Time exposure P450 Ugt (h) 1a1 2b1 3a1 4a1 1a6 2b1

    BNF 24 +++ + - - - - 48 ++ - * - - - 72 +++ + - - + -

    PB 24 - +++ - - - - 48 + +++ + - - + 72 + +++ + * - +

    CLO 24 - +++ - +++ - - 48 - +++ - +++ - * 72 - +++ + +++ - *

    PCN 24 - - + - - + 48 - - + - - + 72 - - + - - +

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    23

    Table 1B: Induction of various P450s and UGTs by prototypical inducers in Liverbeads™

    as a function of concentration at a selected time point where the highest inductions were

    obtained (marked in grey in table 1A). The following concentrations were investigated for each

    compound: PB (100, 300, 1000 and 3000 µM), BNF (1, 5, 10 and 20 µM), CLO (100, 200, 400

    and 1000 µM) and PCN (1, 5 and 10 µM). Fold inductions were arbitrarily set as follows:

    between 1.5 and 2: -/+; 2 and 5: +; 5 and 10: ++; 10 and 30: +++; > 30: ++++; *: decreased

    values (< 1) and -: no change.

    Compound Concentration P450 Ugt (µM) 1a1 2b1 3a1 4a1 1a6 2b1

    BNF 1 ++ - - - - - 5 +++ -/+ - - -/+ - 10 +++ + - - -/+ - 20 +++ ++ - - - -

    PB 100 - ++++ -/+ - - - 300 - ++++ -/+ - - -/+ 1000 -/+ ++++ + - - + 3000 -/+ ++++ + - - +

    CLO 100 - + - +++ - - 200 - ++ -/+ ++++ - * 400 - +++ + ++++ - * 1000 - +++ -/+ ++++ - *

    PCN 1 - - -/+ - - + 5 - - + - - + 10 - - + - - +

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • DMD #33753

    24

    Table 2: Dose and time effects of PHE and CTM exposure on mRNA levels of Cyp1a1,

    Cyp2b1, Cyp3a1 and Ugt2b1 in rat Liverbeads™ cultures. Experiments were performed in

    triplicates using three different batches of rat Liverbeads™, and the values are shown as fold

    induction means ± SD (n=3). Corresponding control values were set up arbitrarily to 1. *: p

    ≤0.05.

    Compound Dose Time

    exposure P450 Ugt2b1 (µM) (h) 1a1 2b1 3a1

    PHE 10 24 1.2 ±0.4 3.7 ±1.6 1.1 ±0.09 1.2 ±0.07 48 3.6* ±0.8 22.1* ±7.8 1.2 ±0.04 1.5* ±0.01

    200 24 2.4* ±0.8 4.6* ±1.4 1.1 ±0.1 1.5* ±0.02 48 6.9* ±0.6 35.2* ±9.4 1.9* ±0.2 1.3 ±0.09

    CTM 2.5 24 1.2 ±0.07 31.8* ±10.4 1.4 ±0.3 2.6* ±0.5 48 2.2* ±0.3 86.9* ±20.1 1.4 ±0.4 1.8* ±0.3

    10 24 2.4* ±0.7 56.3* ±9.4 1.5* ±0.1 3.9* ±1.1 48 3.7* ±0.7 189.8* ±31.6 2.2* ±0.3 2.5* ±0.5

    This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/

  • This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 15, 2010 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.033753

    at ASPE

    T Journals on June 18, 2021

    dmd.aspetjournals.org

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/