les opportunités mer dans le 7èpcrd la mer dans horizon …les opportunités mer dans le 7èpcrd...

Les opportunités Mer dans le 7èPCRD La Mer dans Horizon 2020 Antoine Weexsteen (CNRS-INSU)

PCN Environnement

12/06/2012

IUEM Brest

Budget indicatif pour 2007 – 2013 Accompagner

Pra

tiq

uer

Idées Recherche exploratoire et

indépendante 7,5 milliards €

Recherche fondamentale non

finalisée

Coopération 10 priorités thématiques

dont Environnement 32 milliards €

Mettre en œuvre les politiques

sectorielles

Carrière des chercheurs

Personnes Formation, mobilité

4 milliards €

Capacités Infrastructures de

Recherche PME

Coop. internationale Science dans la

societé 4 milliards €

Renforcer les moyens d’innovation

publique et privé

7ème Programme Cadre de Recherche et Développement : Structure générale et objectifs

NCP Coordinator (MESR)

CAPACITES 13. Région

(Univ Cergy) 14. PME (Oseo) 15. INCO (IRD)

16. Infrastructures (CNRS)

17. SIS (MESR)

AUTRES PROGRAMMES

18. Euratom (CEA) 19. JRC (CEA)

IDEES 11. Idées-erc (CNRS)

PERSONNES 12. Mobilité (CPU)

3

Les missions des PCN :

• Informer et sensibiliser sur les opportunités offertes par le 7ème PCRDT (AAP, règles de base).

• Accompagner dans le montage de projets (éligibilité, pertinence) – animation atelier montage de projet.

• Soutenir la recherche de partenaires européen (diffusion offres/demandes - réseau PCN).

• Intermédiaire auprès du Ministère de la recherche française.

Legal Financial (ANRT)

Points de Contact Nationaux : Le réseau français

COOPERATION 1. Santé (INSERM)

2. Bio (INRA) 3. ICT (UbiFrance)

4. NMP (CEA) 5. Energie (ADEME)

1. Environment (ADEME)

1. Transport (ERT) 2. SHS (CNRS)

3. Sécurité (CEA) 4. Espace (CEA)

ADEME Sophie LOQUEN (coordinatrice)

Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité (FRB) Sarah MATEI (Gestion durable des ressources naturelles et biodiversité, environnements marins, éco-technologies)

Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers (INSU) Elisabeth KOHLER Antoine WEEXSTEEN (Changement climatique, observation de la terre et outils du développement durable)

Enviropea Anna ERSHOVA (Demandes générales, veille et gestion de l'information)

Points de Contact Nationaux : Membres du consortium Environnement

4

Bulletin d’information des PCN

http://www.pcn-energie.fr

http://www.pcn-environnement.fr

https://www.pcn-eie.fr

http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/

5

Points de contact nationaux et PCRD : Se tenir informé

5

Actualité européenne

http://www.pcn-energie.fr/



http://www.pcn-environnement.fr/



https://www.pcn-eie.fr/



http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/

Thème Environnement : les 5 priorités de l’appel 2013

ENVIRONNEMENT

Gérer durablement les Ressources marines et terrestres

6.1.1 Changement climatique 6.2.1 Gestion durable des ressources

6.2.2 Environnement marin 6.3.1 Eco-technologies

6.3.3 Evaluation des technologies 6.4.1 Observation de la Terre

6.4.2 Outils pour le développement durable

Mobiliser les connaissances pour les politiques, l’industrie et la société

6.1.1 Changement climatique 6.1.3 Risques naturels

6.2.1 Gestion durable des ressources 6.3.1 Eco-technologies

6.3.2. Patrimoine culturel 6.4.1 Observation de la Terre

6.4.2 Outils pour le développement durable 6.5.1 Dissémination et activités horizontale

ACTIVITÉ 2

ACTIVITÉ 4

Améliorer l’efficience des ressources 6.2.1 Gestion durable des ressources

6.3.1 Eco-technologies 6.3.2. Patrimoine culturel

6.3.3 Evaluation des technologies 6.4.1 Observation de la Terre

ACTIVITÉ 5

Protéger les citoyens des risques environnementaux 6.1.2 Environnement et santé

6.1.3 Risques naturels 6.4.1 Observation de la Terre

ACTIVITÉ 1

Faire face au changement climatique

6.1.1 Changement climatique 6.2.2 Environnement marin

6.4.1 Observation de la Terre

ACTIVITÉ 3

Appel Environnement 2013 : Objectifs et informations générales

3 objectifs : – Répondre aux enjeux sociétaux majeurs

– Développer et renforcer le leadership européen en matière d’innovation environnementale

– Promouvoir et faciliter le transfert de connaissances

Documents de référence : – Europe 2020

– Initiative phare « Union pour l’Innovation »

Continuité avec le WP 2012 : – Titre chapeau : « Transformative and Responsible Innovation »

– Structure en 5 challenges

– 2 appels : 2 étapes / 1 étape

Budget prévisionnel : +/- 330 M€

Accent PME et innovation : – Soutien à la commercialisation : prototype, test, démonstration, transfert de connaissance,

participation de l’industrie

– Innovation dans les services, process et systèmes d’organisation

– 14 topics devraient requérir 15% à 30% de PME

– 2 topics ouverts (bottom-up)

Accent sur le transfert de connaissances, l’évaluation, l’assimilation et l’exploitation de résultats de recherche

Sujets transversaux : – Appel « The Ocean of Tomorrow » (KBBE, Energie, Transport)

– Sujets liés à d’autres thèmes : KBBE, NMP, Santé, Sécurité

– Coopération internationale : Amérique latine, ASEAN, Japon, Méditerrannée

Anticipation de H2020 : – Structure en challenges

– Accent sur l’innovation et la participation des PME

– Apparition d’un sujet nouveau « matières premières »

Appel Environnement 2013 : Spécificités de l’appel

Appel Environnement 2013 : Budget de l’appel

Un budget en hausse

(*2007-2010 dépenses réelles / 2012-2013 budgets prévisionnels)

6%

Distribution du budget Coopération

Environment

Health

Food, agriculture, fisheries and biotechnology

Information and communication technologies

Nanosciences, nanotechnologies, materials and new production technologies

Energy

Transport

Socio-economic sciences and the humanities

Space

Security

329

0

100

200

300

400

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Mo

nta

nt

(M€

)

Evolution du budget du thème Environnement (2007-2013) *

- Budget du thème Environnement : 1 890M€ sur 7 ans

- Budget 2013 : 19% du budget total Environnement

5 6

4 3

5 6

12

6

4

6

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0

20

40

60

80

100

6.1 Faire face au changement climatique

6.2 Gérer durablement les ressources marines

et terrestres

6.3 Améliorer l'efficience des

ressources

6.4 Protéger les citoyens des risques environnementaux

6.5 Mobiliser les connaissances

environnementales pour les politiques,

l'industrie et la société

No

mb

re d

e t

op

ics

Mo

nta

nt

du

bu

dge

t (M

€)

Budget et nombre de topics par activité (2012-2013)

Budget 2012 Budget prévisionnel 2013 Nombre de topics 2012 Nombre prévisionnel de topics 2013

Appel Environnement 2013 : Budget par activité

- Référence de l’appel: FP7-ENV-2013 (Budget indicatif : 329 millions d’euros)

- Date de publication : 10 juillet 2012

- Dates de clôture : - 16 octobre 2012 (1-stage et 1e étape 2-stage)

- 28 février 2013 (2e étape 2-stage)

- 4 avril 2013 (appel Water)

Budget global : 80M€ Appel 2 étapes

• 6 SUJETS DONT :

• ENV.2013.6.1-1 Processus océaniques liés au climat et impacts combinés de facteurs de stress multiples – FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage

• Oceans play a key role in regulating the climate system. Moreover, marine processes and ecosystems are sensitive to climate change and other stressors. Synergies, combination and feedbacks of single pressures on the marine environment may result in amplified impacts. Under a comprehensive multi-forcing assessment, regional and global scale modelling capabilities, laboratory and field experiments and observation systems should be combined to enhance specific knowledge on key marine-climate research issues, such as:

– relevant climate-related physical-chemical ocean processes and dynamics, including coupled ocean-atmosphere mechanisms, stratification, thermohaline circulation, interaction with the cryosphere;

– cumulative impacts and feedbacks of greenhouse gases increase — leading in particular to warming, acidification and deoxygenation — and non-climatic stressors (such as overfishing, pollution, etc.) on marine biogeochemistry, ecological communities, biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services;

– assessment of socio-economic vulnerabilities and evaluation of how potential climate-driven physical and biological changes may affect relevant economic activities and human welfare.

• Acknowledging that processes and impacts may be diversified and exacerbated in different regions, like the Arctic, proposals may address different processes and impacts, and may focus on different geographical areas, depending on their specific relevance to the key research challenges.

• Funding scheme: Collaborative Project • The requested EU contribution per project shall not exceed EUR 9 000 000. • One or more proposals can be selected. • Expected impact: Improved climate predictions and more accurate quantification of climate change impacts on marine ecosystems and services

through the reduction of uncertainties. Improved EU and international policies aimed at protecting the marine environment and safeguarding it as a living resource for human communities, and more effective policy and management options for societal responses to climate change.

• Specific feature: Projects selected under this topic will be linked through a coordination mechanism that will be defined during the negotiation stage. Costs of this coordination will be covered by project resources.

• Call identifier: FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage • Date of publication: 10 July 2012 • Deadline: First stage: 16 October 2012 at 17.00.00, Brussels local time

11

1er ENJEU : FAIRE FACE AU CHANGEMENT CLIMATIQUE


• 8 SUJETS DONT :

• ENV.2013.6.2-8 GESTION DURABLE DES RESSOURCES SOUS-MARINES ET DES GRANDS FONDS EUROPEENS – FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage

• Although the deep sea and sub-sea floors environments are still largely unknown, current research suggests that these environments modulate the global climate and contain immense mineral and biological resources. Because of the slow rates associated with deep sea processes, these systems are also particularly vulnerable to intervention and they will require careful management to preserve their function for future generations as human activities move into deeper waters. Research should therefore focus on the assessment of the environmental impacts of the exploitation of deep sea raw material resources and in particular rare earth minerals, hydrothermal mineral deposits, methane hydrates and similar seafloor and sub-seafloor resources that can be extracted using various techniques. It should also enhance the understanding of associated geological processes, e.g. the effect on the stability of methane hydrates and its repercussions for climate change or continental slope failures/tsunamis that endanger both ecosystems and society. Research should also assess the resilience of deep sea and sub-seafloor ecosystems and of biodiversity to resource extraction activities. It should determine recovery conditions, associated timescales and tipping points beyond which recovery is irreversible. Practices should be developed, including management practices, standards, legal instruments, covering national jurisdictions and international waters, concerning economically viable, environmentally sound and socially acceptable resource exploration and extraction. Finally it should assess and demonstrate new monitoring technologies and systems to fully determine the functioning of the deep sea and sub-seafloor ecosystems where the resources are found.

• A pan-European, multi-disciplinary, cross-sectoral approach to ensure that knowledge and innovation are shared across Europe will be required. • Funding scheme: Collaborative Project • The requested EU contribution per project shall not exceed EUR 9 000 000. • Up to one proposal can be selected. • Expected impact: Enhanced knowledge base on issues related to the environmental impacts and processes linked to deep sea exploitation activities. Determination of the boundary

conditions of environmentally sustainable exploitation activities. Improved governance of deep sea environments. Innovative technologies and systems, leading to increased European competitiveness in the marine technology sector. Substantial contribution to the implementation of relevant EU initiatives such as the Integrated Maritime Policy, 'A Resource-Efficient Europe' roadmap and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Facilitate synergies with international initiatives like the Integrated Ocean Drilling Programme (IODP).

• Specific feature: A significant involvement from the industrial sector will be required, ranging from large industrial companies (e.g. deep sea mining oil & gas, telecommunications) to SMEs. The assessment and demonstration of relevant technologies should be included as an activity within any proposal submitted to this topic.

• Additional eligibility criteria: Projects will only be selected for funding on the condition that the estimated EU contribution going to SMEs is 15 % or more of the total estimated EU contribution for the project as a whole. This will be assessed at the end of the negotiation, before signature of the grant agreement. Proposals not fulfilling this criterion will not be funded.

• Call identifier: FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage • Date of publication: 10 July 2012 • Deadline: First stage: 16 October 2012 at 17.00.00, Brussels local time

12

2e ENJEU : UTILISER ET GERER DURABLEMENT LES RESSOURCES TERRESTRES ET MARINES


• 4 SUJETS DONT 1 SUJET LIE A LA MER

• ENV.2013.6.4-3 LITTORAUX MENACES EN EUROPE : TSUNAMIS ET RISQUES LIES AU CLIMAT (Collaborative) – FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage

• Recent climate-related and tsunami catastrophic events have highlighted the increased exposure and vulnerability of societies in coastal areas. Research should strongly enhance today's forecasting, prediction and early warning capabilities in order to improve the assessment of coastal vulnerability and risks and develop adequate prevention, mitigation and preparedness measures. The knowledge gathered and lessons learned from recent dramatic events (e.g. Great East Japan Tsunami, Xynthia storm in France, Liguria flash floods), as well as from past and on-going EU research, should be used in order to design and develop management approaches to minimise social and economic losses and environmental impacts and increase resilience to such events. Synergies with the collaborative research action on 'coastal vulnerability' announced in the first call of the International Opportunities Fund by the Belmont Forum need to be considered.

• Proposals should either address tsunamis or extreme hydro-meteorological events (e.g. extreme winds, storm surges, coastal and estuarine floods — taking in consideration the effects of climate change) and should focus on the respective key research challenges. Research should focus on Europe, but international cooperation with any third countries experiencing the same type of threats and willing to share know-how is encouraged. Innovative, cost-effective, technological or non-technological solutions as well as ecosystem-based approaches should be explored. Organisational and institutional/governance aspects have to be considered as well.

• Funding scheme: Collaborative Project • The requested EU contribution per project shall not exceed EUR 6 000 000. • One or more proposals can be selected. • Expected impact: Faster attainment of the disaster risk reduction goals of UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction).

Design of cost-effective risk-reduction plans, based on the proposed tools and solutions. Improved risk governance and preparedness through the provision of timely information and warnings to decision-makers.

• Specific feature: Projects should consider attributing a specific budget to clustering activities with projects on related issues selected in this call and with those selected by the Belmont Forum call on coastal vulnerability.

• www.belmontforum.org/iof • Call identifier: FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage • Date of publication: 10 July 2012 • Deadline: First stage: 16 October 2012 at 17.00.00, Brussels local time

13

4e ENJEU : PROTEGER LES CITOYENS CONTRE LES RISQUES ENVIRONNEMENTAUX

http://www.belmontforum.org/iof

2e ENJEU : UTILISER ET GERER DURABLEMENT LES RESSOURCES TERRESTRES ET MARINES

Appel conjoint « OCEAN OF TOMORROW »

-Aborder les thématiques marines par des recherches interdisciplinaires -Développement de technologies marines : anticiper et surveiller l’état environnemental des mers -Evaluer les activités actuelles et futures et contribuer à ce qu’elles soient pérennes Les technologies doivent être conçues de manière intégrées en rassemblant des chercheurs et des PME

Appel lancé en cooopération avec KBBE (Knowledge Based Bio Economy), NMP, Energy, Environnement, Transport

BUDGET du call Ocean

• 55 Meuros dans le WP 2013, dont :

KBBE (th.2 ) : 19 Meuros

NMP (th.4) : 7 Meuros

Energy (th.5) : 4 Meuros

Environnement (th.6) : 15 Meuros

Transport (th.7) : 10 Meuros

KBBE 19 35%

NMP 7 13%

ENERGY 4 7%

ENVIRONMENT 15 27%

TRANSPORT 10 18%

15

Ocean of Tomorrow Topic Bio sensors

• OCEAN-2013-1 Biosensors pour la surveillence en temps réel des catastrophes biologiques et des contaminants d’origine humaine dans l’environnement marin

• Due to growing concerns about the health of the oceans and their capacity to continue to provide resources, goods and services as well as associated risks to the human health, there is an increasing demand for real-time monitoring of the environmental status of marine water quality and the provision of early warning systems. Real-time in situ monitoring of marine chemical contaminants (including emerging pollutants, biohazards e.g. algal toxins) is of utmost importance for the sustainable management and exploitation of the seas and their resources.

• Technology wise, marine biosensors have the potential to offer unique features for highly specific and precise measurements, including under multi-stressor conditions, by combining technological elements (including nanotechnologies) and bio-receptors in a single measurement device. Thus they could open new avenues to respond to the growing need for accurate real time monitoring of the quality of sea water and marine ecosystems to support relevant EU legislations such as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD).

• Based on most recent knowledge on genomics and physiology as well as on materials, nanotechnology, information technologies and relevant existing detection/monitoring technologies, the research under this topic should aim at developing innovative real-time, in situ biosensors, taking advantage of nanotechnology when applicable. These sensors should target the detection and monitoring of high impact and presently difficult to measure emerging pollutants and other substances, such as algal toxins and their producers, synthetic organics, herbicides/pesticides and persistent organic pollutants (POP), including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and should enable early diagnosis of deterioration of the environmental status of the marine waters in multi-stressor conditions.

• The proposals should include a test phase to demonstrate the potential of these biosensor(s) for in situ environmental and/or aquaculture related applications. Measurement devices should show ability to compete with/complement non real time alternatives and provide faster, less expensive, and less time-consuming measurements than the currently available instrumental analytical methods. A proof of concept in terms of product and/or process should be delivered within the project demonstrating industrial manufacturability.

• The multi-disciplinary approach of the research undertaken is essential to address the topic. It will be considered during the evaluation of the criterion related to "S/T quality". The multi-sectoral composition of the partnership and the participation of industrial partners and relevant end-users are essential for the implementation of the project. It will be considered during the evaluation of the criterion related to "Implementation".

• Funding scheme: Collaborative project

• Several projects may be funded within the total budget of the topic (EUR 15 000 000).

• Additional eligibility criteria:

• - The requested European Union contribution shall not exceed EUR 6 000 000 per proposal. • - Collaborative projects will only be selected for funding on the condition that the requested EU contribution going to SME(s) is 25% or more of the total requested EU contribution.

This will be assessed at the end of the negotiation, before signature of the grant agreement. Proposals not fulfilling this criterion will not be funded. • Expected impact: • New biosensors in the field of marine environmental monitoring will: • Enable early detection and more effective monitoring of the marine environment and its status and implementation of appropriate management actions in line with the Marine Strategy

Framework Directive (MSFD); • Improve sustainable management and exploitation of marine resources (such as fisheries and aquaculture) in particular the monitoring of quality of shellfish waters and minimise risks to

human health; • Provide competitive advantage and leadership to European industry, for example within the fields of biotechnology, sensor development, diagnostic technologies and nanotechnology. •

16

Ocean of Tomorrow Sensors multifonctionnels innovants

• OCEAN 2013.2 – Capteurs multifonctionnels innovants pour la suveillance in situ des environnements marins et des activités maritimes liées

• There is an urgent need to improve the in-situ component of the ocean observing systems to achieve an appropriate and comprehensive understanding of the functioning of the marine environment at different geographic, temporal scales and the monitoring of marine and maritime activities to ensure their sustainable development. As commercially available sensors tend to be too large, expensive, and power-hungry for widespread use, reducing the cost for acquisition of data is a key priority in order to implement EU legislations such as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), the Common Fisheries Policy CFP), support international initiatives such as the Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) and the Global Earth Observation System of System (GEOSS).

• In this context the topic seeks to develop robust, easily usable across multiples platforms, cost effective multifunctional sensors and their packages that provide reliable in-situ measurements of key parameters. Research and demonstration activities under this topic shall address in a comprehensive manner all the following aspects:

• 1/ Developing cost-effective sensors suitable for large-scale production, taking advantage of "new generation" technologies such as within the fields of miniaturisation, communication, positioning systems, disposable technologies, and IT tools, software, energy storage and usage.

• 2/ Sensors should be compact, autonomous multifunctional integrated packages that could be deployed using free floating devices or, buoys, platforms, or ships of opportunities including fishing vessels. The sensors must be developed as precompetitive prototypes and field tested in close cooperation with stakeholders such as sensor designers, SME's, managers of monitoring/observing systems, marine industry e.g fishermen and end-users. An essential part of this topic will be to ensure technology transfer through an integrated approach, bridging between laboratory testing and commercially viable product.

• 3/ Addressing data flow issues, including data acquisition, access and retrieval, storage, transmission, standardisation, and pre-processing. The projects should take advantage of the latest web enablement technology for setting up sensors' networks suitable for open access and data sharing.

• 4/ Making the sensors fully interoperable with existing observing systems and compatible with standard requirement such as the EU Fisheries Data Collection Framework, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the INSPIRE directive, the GMES and GOOS/GEOSS initiatives.


•

• Funding scheme: Collaborative project • Several projects may be funded within the total budget of the topic (EUR 15 000 000). • Additional eligibility criteria:

• - The requested European Union contribution shall not exceed EUR 6 000 000 per proposal. • - Collaborative projects will only be selected for funding on the condition that the requested EU contribution going to SME(s) is 30% or more of the total requested EU contribution. This

will be assessed at the end of the negotiation, before signature of the grant agreement. Proposals not fulfilling this criterion will not be funded. • Expected impact: • The projects will: • Provide a large increase in the temporal and geographic coverage from in-situ marine sensors to enhance the European contribution to Global Monitoring of the Oceans; • Increase availability of standardised in-situ data that is suitable for integration within key marine observation, modelling and monitoring systems and reduce ocean modelling

uncertainty; • Reduce cost of data collection system in support of fisheries management; • Advance competitiveness for European Industry's & particularly SME's within the Marine sensing sector; • Enable better cooperation between key sectors (Manufacturing Industry, ICT, Maritime Industry, Marine Science, Fisheries etc.); • Support implementation of European Maritime Policies (MSFD, CFP, IMP, etc.); • Promote new discoveries leading to better understanding of the seas. •

17

Ocean of Tomorrow

Antifouling innovant pour applications maritimes

• OCEAN 2013.3 Innovative antifouling materials for maritime applications • Biofouling is a major concern for mobile (e.g. ships) and stationary (e.g. aquaculture cages or offshore power generation systems) maritime structures, sensors and equipments. It

negatively affects marine and maritime activities by creating a need for regular maintenance, which is costly, might disrupt operations and is potentially polluting. With the purpose of avoiding toxic biocides and heavy metals used in antifouling coatings, novel alternative cost-efficient and environmentally friendly approaches are needed.

• The proposals under this topic should focus on developing new, well beyond the state of the art, antifouling materials and should address in an integrative way mobile and stationary maritime applications.

• On the basis of a thorough analysis of the state of the art, research could draw on the whole range of antifouling materials e.g. foul release approach, biomimetics, marine biotechnology based coatings, polymers etc. The proposals should include benchmarking of existing materials, technologies and on-going research. In this sense environmental and economic factors, as well as performance, must be duly considered.

• Improvement in the understanding of marine biofouling processes, including their relation with biocorrosion, with respect of the developed materials should be an integral part of the proposals. For the resolution of the technological bottlenecks impeding the achievement of well performing final materials and products, applicants are welcome to investigate and exploit the potential offered by converging technologies such as e.g. materials science and engineering, maritime technology, nanotechnology and biotechnology.

• The proposals should include relevant field testing for all the selected applications. Development, improvement and/or standardisation of relevant protocols should be included. Proof of concept in terms of product and/or process should be delivered within the project, excluding commercially usable prototypes (in compliance with European Commission Communication 2006/C323/01), but convincingly proving scalability towards industrial needs.

• In the case of marine biotechnology based approaches the issues of supply and the need for the biobased active antifouling compounds to be produced in bulk, as required for final commercial production should be given due consideration.

• The proposals should follow a life cycle approach for the new materials and their selected applications also taking into account issues of cost efficiency, effective life span, production, handling, maintenance, environmental impact, ecotoxicological profile and end of life. The proposals should include assessment of the environmental, health and toxicological effects according to REACH, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals and/or relevant international standards.


• • Funding scheme: Collaborative project • Several projects may be funded within the total budget of the topic (EUR 15 000 000). • Additional eligibility criteria: • - The requested European Union contribution shall not exceed EUR 8 000 000 per proposal. • - Collaborative projects will only be selected for funding on the condition that the requested EU contribution going to SME(s) is 25% or more of the total requested EU contribution. This

will be assessed at the end of the negotiation, before signature of the grant agreement. Proposals not fulfilling this criterion will not be funded. • • Expected impacts: • The projects will: • Increase efficiency and competitiveness of maritime activities based on mobile and/or stationary maritime structures (transport, aquaculture, fisheries, marine energy) by reducing

operation and life-cycle-costs, negative impacts on the marine environment and, in particular for the transport sector, CO2 emissions; • Enhance competitiveness and sustainability of the European biotechnology, and/or materials related industry; • Better understanding/assessment the scope of existing antifouling materials and technologies; • Contribute to the implementation of EU policies, Environment policy (e.g. the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, REACH), Transport policy (Roadmap to a Single European transport

Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system) as well as industrial and innovation policy, such as the EU Strategy for Key Enabling Technologies and the Lead Market Initiative on Bio-based products.

• Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC

•

18

Ocean of Tomorrow Transports innovants pour systèmes éoliens off shore

• OCEAN 2013.4 Innovative transport and deployment systems for the offshore wind energy sector • In its Communication "Offshore Wind Energy: Action needed to deliver on the Energy Policy Objectives for 2020 and beyond", the Commission underlines that the exploitable potential of

offshore wind by 2020 is likely to be 30-40 GW, and in the 2030 time horizon it could be up to 150 GW. • In 2007, the Energy Wind Association assessed that achieving 40 GW by 2020 will mean that 7,800 turbines of 5 MW need to be built over the next 13 years. Those turbines have to be

assembled, transported and installed on sites.

• European Wind Initiative identifies transport and logistic issues as key elements for the deployment and maintenance of offshore wind farms. The TP Wind Strategic Research Agenda also points to research needs both in relation to the cost-effective installation, maintenance, operation and decommissioning of large offshore wind farms as well as to transport, logistics and equipment needs.

• In its Communication on Strategic goals and recommendations for the EU's maritime transport policy until 2018, the Commission stresses that maritime transport is an important

instrument of the European energy policy. Amongst others offshore servicing vessels are considered as increasingly important aspect for ensuring the well functioning of the energy market.

• Research activities under this topic shall address the following aspects: – Development of innovative and cost-effective deployment strategies for large-scale turbines, including building and testing onshore; – Elaboration of optimal logistical processes and on-land transport links for large offshore structures – Design of novel vessel types and equipment for installation, maintenance and decommissioning and validation at reduced scale; – Development of safety procedures for installation, operation and maintenance activities, regarding both offshore wind structures and the vessels; – Improved operations and maintenance including the enhanced role of remote condition monitoring and systems with reduced human intervention; – Development of new business models at European level for large offshore systems based on integrated life-cycle approaches; – Development of methods and tools to assess the field performance of offshore wind farms servicing vessels and for optimised service activities in terms of lead time and energy usage.

• Proposals are expected to include validation activities at reduced but industrially relevant scale using testing models and where possible tests at real scale using existing infrastructure and equipment, adapting those to validate models and management tools. Tests should also address extreme conditions. The proposal should cover both ground based and floating wind parks.

• The multi-disciplinary approach of the research undertaken is essential to address the topic. Knowledge exchange with oil/gas and maritime sectors is expected. These aspects will be

considered during the evaluation of the criterion related to "S/T quality". The multi-sectoral composition of the partnership and the participation of industrial partners and relevant end-users are essential for the implementation of the project. It will be considered during the evaluation of the criterion related to "Implementation".

• In the framework of the SET-Plan European Industrial Initiatives a specific monitoring and knowledge sharing mechanism will be established under the auspices of the Commission and the selected project will be expected to participate.

• • Funding Scheme: Collaborative Project

• Up to one project may be funded. • Additional eligibility criteria:

• The requested European Union contribution shall not exceed EUR 10 000 000 per proposal. • • Expected impact: The project will: • Contribute to the implementation of the roadmap activity of the European Wind Initiative aiming at supporting offshore take-off in the medium-term; • Contribute to the development of new niche markets for the European shipbuilding and shipping industries thereby contributing to competitiveness of the sector and to the creation of

new jobs.

19

WP Transport 2013 (1)

• Gestion efficiente des ports compte tenu de l’accroissement important du trafic et des échanges de commerciaux

– Deux projets distincts : • Observatoire des ports européens avec la collecte de données de tous types et développement d’indicateurs • Répondre aux changements qui s’opèrent dans la gestion et l’administration des ports avec un volet socio-économique

• SST.2013.6-2. Towards a competitive and resource efficient port transport system • CP/CSA-CA - Call: FP7-TRANSPORT-2013-MOVE-1 • Content and scope: The objectives of the action are to facilitate ports to efficiently handle the increasing freight volumes; to enable seamless logistics chains; to review the restrictions on

provisions for port services; to enhance the transparency on ports’ financing, highlighting the destination of public funding to the different port activities with a view to avoid any distortion of competition; and to “establish a mutually recognisable framework on the training of port workers in different fields of port activities3”. The same objectives are at the forefront of the EU transport policy actions.

• This topic is aiming to address two particular challenges through two distinct projects. The first focuses on significant differences in current practice in collecting and interpreting ports data that restrict the ability to monitor the evolution, developments and needs of the EU port system. The second is examining the tremendous impacts of innovation dynamics as they become critical for the sustainable development of EU ports. Technological changes and market pressures will drive requirements for mastering innovative port operations and generating the necessary human resources, i.e. people with the right skills, training and qualifications to understand, master and exploit all the advantages provided by the new technologies.

• -A collaborative project is expected to develop a ports observatory with a set of indicators measuring EU ports performance, activities and developments. The results of the PPRISM project and other relevant work, including failures from past projects, should be taken into account. Indicators should initially be identified across five different categories: 1) market trends and structure; 2) logistic chain and operational performance; 3) environment; 4) governance; and 5) socio-economic issues. Starting from a limited set, focussing on the five different categories, forward-thinking should seek possible extensions and elaborations of the set of indicators. This collaborative action should go beyond the port authorities and develop an approach to obtain data from the whole port community: port authorities, terminal operators, shipping lines calling to the different ports, etc. At the same time, it should ensure that inland ports are also covered by the observatory. The implementation will demonstrate that it satisfies stakeholder confidentiality concerns in the management of data. The indicators will be weighted and aggregated in order to have a comprehensive and meaningful output. A balanced representation of ports and port actors across the EU, and possibly the neighbouring countries, will be demonstrated and an easy to use interface for the collection of the data implemented.

• -To meet the second challenge another project will address sectorial changes and human issues, specifically needed skills, as a component of wider efforts to make EU ports more competitive and resource efficient. The competitiveness of European ports will depend on the ability to innovate and to apply new technologies in an effective and efficient way. The human element is one of the key factors of success. Port industries employees should not only be able to use new systems but to guide innovation. Core elements of the project then should consider processes of terminals and ports, new techniques and technology changes, impacts on performance and evaluate staff development requirements to ensure safe and efficient operations but also to support career development and knowledge building. Relevant results of EU projects should be considered. The action should ensure the active participation of the key stakeholders and facilitate an effective, broad and open dialogue between the social partners within the port sector for pan-European solutions.

• Expected impact: • The first action should produce a knowledge and management tool for monitoring the efficiency and performance of sea and inland ports. It will allow a comprehensive view on port

activities, developments and performance and, at the same time, allow for individual ports to compare their activities and operations with the EU average and with ports in other important regions like Asia and the Americas. The results should include appropriate mechanisms to collect, manage and distribute the data on a long term and to show trends over a substantial timeline and a business case to ensure sustainable continuity. For this activity, collaboration with Mediterranean Partner Countries may result.

• The second action should support both the implementation of the ILO ‘Guidelines for Training of Workers in the Port Sector’ and the objective of the ‘Social Agenda for maritime transport’ for the establishment of a mutually recognisable framework on the training of port workers in different fields of port activities. It should identify anticipated human resource demand profiles, skill and training needs for EU ports in the 2030 horizon. It should facilitate consensus building on the next steps that need to be made in accomplishing the objectives of a sustainable and efficient EU port system.

• Up to 1 CP and 1 CSA-CA expected to be funded • 3 Meuros for 1 CP/48 months • 1,5 Meuros for 1 CSA-CA/30 months

• Call : 10 July. Deadline : 14 Nov 2012 17:00 Brux. time.

20

WP Transport 2013 (2)

• SST.2013.5-2. Low cost flexible automation and mechanisation in small to medium shipyards • Level 2 - CP-FP - Call: FP7-SST-2013-RTD-1

• Mécanisation de chaînes de montage de chantiers navals pour petites et moyennes unités.

• Content and scope:

• The objective of this topic is to strengthen the competitiveness of shipbuilding industries, in particular SMEs, through innovative and cost-effective processes while developing new skills and job opportunities in this sector. Focus will be put on low cost automation and mechanisation for shipyards processes including design, engineering, basic material processing, assembly and outfitting.

• For defined processes, activities should include: • The identification of technical needs and development of cost models for low cost, flexible automation and mechanisation based on typical

production volume throughput of European small-medium size shipyards building, repairing, converting and maintaining ships. – The identification of automation solutions matching the technical requirements for design, engineering, basic material processing, assembly and

outfitting, which have proven reliability within the large shipyards and are relevant for the needs of European small-medium size shipyards, including solutions from outside the shipbuilding industry.

– The development and testing of business models that include cost-effective flexible solutions for shared facilities, equipment and/or human resources. Demonstration of selected automation and mechanisation solutions in small-medium size shipyards with subsequent evaluation of the relevance and efficiency of these technologies, including cost-benefit aspects and human skills requirements.

– Establishment of a development scheme for adapting promising automation and mechanisation solutions to the needs of European small-medium size shipyards with focus on material processing, assembly and outfitting.

– Development of specific training programmes in the domain of mechanisation and automation specific to the shipbuilding industry. SMEs active in the shipbuilding sector should have major roles in the consortium and share at least 50% of the requested EU funding. The participation of a major shipyard will be considered as an asset.

• Expected impact: • Results are expected to raise the competitiveness of small-medium shipyards, reinforce the role of SMEs, and increase the availability of technical

skills suitable for the shipbuilding industries. All solutions should ensure a minimal environmental impact in shipyards.

• Collaborative Project • EC Contribution Up to 3M Euros • Call : 10 July. Deadline : 14 Nov 2012 17:00 Brux. time.

21

WP KBBE 2013 (1)

Activity 2.1: Sustainable production and management of biological resources from land forest and aquatic environment

• Gestion des pêches en fonction des écosystèmes (et non en fonction de l’épuisement d’une seule espèce en voie

d’épuisement) : développement de nouveaux savoirs sur les interactions entre les espèces, micro chimie, distribution

de la populationn au sein d’un ecosystème, paramètres biologiques.

• KBBE.2013.1.2-08: Innovative insights and tools to integrate the ecosystem-based approach into fisheries advice

• Call: FP7-KBBE-2013-7 – single stage

• The challenge of implementing the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management requires development and use of innovative scientific methods, new tools and technologies as well as new statistical, modelling tools and

assessment methods that go beyond the singlespecies approaches which used to be, to a large extent, the main sources of scientific advice. It will also require adaptation of current management objectives and practises.

• The first objective of the project is to make the best use of new tools and technologies such as genetics, microchemistry, and isotope analyses to develop new knowledge on population distribution, spatial patterns of spawning

components, stocks structure and definition, habitat preferences, species interactions (including food-web and predator-preys interactions), migration patterns, and some biological parameters such as growth and fecundity, for

species targeted in fisheries carried out in EC waters as well as for other species caught incidentally or because of fisheries impacts on their habitats or food sources.

• The second objective is to develop innovative assessment methods that address multispecies concerns resulting from biological interactions between species. This includes consideration of biodiversity, food-web structures and

habitat impacts including indicators of these. A new range of approaches supporting the development of new assessment tools, including ecosystems models such as size-based models and indicators of ecosystem function (e.g.

size based metrics, stable isotopes, etc), among other options, should be considered and developed.

• These approaches and the ecosystem models should be tested using data rich marine ecosystems with a long history of fisheries exploitation, as well as on data poor systems and using simulations. The performance of these

ecosystems models should be compared and evaluated with respect to their suitability for fisheries and environmental management purposes, and to their ability to predict responses of a multispecies community of fish to

changes in fishing mortality. Future data requirements for correct implementation of these models should be also investigated.

• The third objective is to develop an innovative decision support framework that serves to provide an evidence basis for policy makers about the trade-off between various management options on a multispecies basis. The project

shall utilise the assessment methods developed under the second objective as a basis to develop interactive tools for decision support and include a series of case studies of possible approaches, involving iterative management

plan development with stakeholder interactions and considering the socio-economic effects.

• Modelling development and management aspects should be based on close cooperation with the fishing industry in order to integrate fishers' knowledge. In addition, training actions will have to be planned between scientists and

stakeholders (including fishing sector, international scientific organisations providing scientific advice on fisheries management and competent authorities for decision-making).

• The project should use available information (including historical data sets) from the EC Data Collection Framework (EC Council Regulation No199/2008 and Commission Decision 2008/949). It should also liaise with other

relevant national and international research initiatives (e.g. on-going FP7 research activities such as FP7 ECOKNOWS, MYFISH and BENTHIS projects).

• Participation of relevant partners from Australia, Canada and New Zealand will add to the scientific and/or technological excellence of the project and ensure effective uptake of ongoing international efforts for the

implementation of the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.

• Funding scheme: Collaborative Project (large-scale integrating project targeted to SMEs).


• - The requested European Commission contribution shall not exceed EUR 6 000 000 per proposal.

• - The estimated EU contribution going to SMEs shall be at least 15% total requested EU contribution. This will be assessed at the end of the negotiation, before signature of the

Grant

• Agreement.

• - The project will address the regional dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and at least one case study should be developed in each of the following regional seas: Baltic Sea, North Sea, Northern and Western Waters,

and Mediterranean and Black Seas.

• - The duration of the proposed project shall be 4 years.

• Additional information: Up to one project may be funded.

• Expected impact: The project will provide new knowledge, methods, models and tools to support the integration of an ecosystem-based approach in fisheries advice and to support decision-making for ecosystem based

fisheries and environmental management. It will be of high relevance to the future management of marine living resources and will support proper implementation of the new CFP, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive

(MSFD) and the Habitat Directive.

22

WP KBBE (2)


• SUPPORT A L’AQUACULTURE EUROPENNE A TRAVERS TROIS AXES :

o KBBE.2013.1.2-09 DIVERSIFICATION DES ESPECES DE POISSONS ET DES PRODUITS DE L’AQUACULTURE

Call: FP7-KBBE-2013-7 – single stage

• Finfish aquaculture in Europe is largely dominated by few species that provide most of the current production both in terms of volume and value. However, despite the progress made so far in controlling the biological processes it seems that the capacity of the European and

global markets to absorb theses products has now become an important limiting factor. Therefore, potential for growth might also depend henceforth on the capacity of the sector to exploit sustainably the aquatic biodiversity through

species diversification. The aim of the project will be to explore the biological and socio-economic potential of new/emerging candidate fish species and subsequently support the diversification of the activity in terms of species, seafood products and markets.

This will require a particular effort of research and innovation in understanding new biological models, while developing adequate husbandry practices and technologies. Considering that throughout Europe work on several "new species" is already ongoing covering

different aspects and with different levels of advance and intensity, the project, instead of implementing a "whole lifecycle" approach, will build (without overlapping) on recent and ongoing initiatives and will focus only on targeted issues (i.e., related to reproduction and/or

larval rearing and/or nutrition and/or fish health and/or husbandry technology, etc) that constitute to date the main bottlenecks in an aquaculture production context for the fish species that will be considered. Therefore the project will aim at providing specific solutions

(e.g., protocols, adequate husbandry methods and technology, (cost-) efficient feeds and veterinary treatments/solutions etc) to specific, species-related documented problems. The species considered by the proposals will be selected based on their documented biological (e.g.,

availability of broodstock, short time to market size, fillet yield, flesh quality, etc) and economical (e.g., production costs, markets' availability, consumers' acceptability, suitability for product diversification and added value etc) potential for allowing growth of the European

aquaculture sector.

• The proposals will include a strong socio-economic component with particular emphasis on the potential of each species considered for adding value to aquaculture products along the seafood chain from the farm to the consumer and boosting competitiveness of the sector.

• Social, economical, market, cultural and legal aspects will be considered. In particular, the project will focus on new products development (as well as on adding value to raw products), will address European and global markets dynamics, marketing and quality standards,

certification schemes, competition from local and imported commodities and will provide solid elements for establishing efficient price strategies. It will also consider consumers’ and retailers’ preferences for new farmed species as well as, for new added value seafood

products.

• Work on the following species will not be eligible for funding: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiis), carp (Cyprinus carpio), sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), sea bream (Sparus aurata), turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), European eel

(Anguilla anguilla), bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).



• - The requested European Union contribution shall not exceed EUR 9 000 000 per proposal.

• - The estimated EU contribution going to SMEs shall be at least 15 % of the total requested EU contribution. This will be assessed at the end of the negotiation, before signature of the Grant Agreement.

• - The duration of the proposed project shall be minimum 5 years.


• Expected impact: The project will anticipate future success story(ies) in European aquaculture. It will contribute in identifying the most appropriate candidates for fuelling the future growth of the European aquaculture sector. It will remove bottlenecks in science, markets

and consumers' perception/preferences. It will contribute in providing solutions to specific obstacles hampering the mastering of the biological cycle of new species in a production context. It will identify the most adequate options for developing new and competitive seafood

products in the markets and will pave the way to the development of new markets for new products through the concomitant development of new species biological production and adequate market prospects.

23

WP KBBE (3)


• KBBE.2013.1.2-10: AMELIORER LA SELECTION DES ESPECES DANS LES FERMES AQUACOLES dans 5 espèces

précises : saumon, truite, carpe, bar, dorade, turbot

• Call: FP7-KBBE-2013-7 – single stage • Research and technological development have been essential in mastering the biological cycle of the main European aquatic farmed species and making possible the establishment of relatively stable aquaculture productions. Henceforth, targeted selective breeding will be

critical for consolidating the biological pillar of the European aquaculture sector by enhancing predictability of the production and introducing productivity gains and subsequently result in improving the competitiveness of these European seafood products.

• The main objective of this project will be to stimulate the development of breeding programmes and/or underpin the existing ones in the following fish species: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiis), carp (Cyprinus carpio), sea bass

(Dicentrarchus labrax), sea bream (Sparus aurata) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). The effort will be equally distributed among these species.

• The project will focus on the improvement of specific traits (individual or combined selection strategies), according to their biological and economical potential, according to the biological challenges of the species concerned, as well as, to the needs of the producers and the

• European seafood sector in terms of final product quality and potential for product diversification.

• In particular, the project will investigate the possibilities for measurable/quantifiable genetic improvement by focusing in priority on some of the following traits: 1) resistance to pathogens and diseases that hamper the production and for which no efficient vaccine or no

• cost/efficient prevention/treatment method exist, 2) growth and filleting yield, 3) adaptability to alternative feeds (and changing diets) and flesh quality. Other specific, clearly defined and measurable traits maybe considered, assuming that their interest and potential for the

species concerned is demonstrated in the proposal.

• The project will develop (and/or adapt existing) adequate tools and methods (ideally nonlethal) for the measurement of the selected traits and general fitness in an aquaculture context.

• Phenotypic, molecular and genetic correlations between the traits considered (and eventuallyother relevant traits) will be addressed, in particular to avoid unfavourable selection for correlated traits. Protocols and appropriate assessment tools for the monitoring of the

selection process and related breeding programmes will also be developed.

• The proposal will also include a horizontal component aiming at assessing the economic impact of the project. The analysis should include an economic assessment traits considered for selection, as well as, an overall cost-benefit analysis of selective breeding. An economic

review of existing breeding programmes should be conducted to evaluate the potential productivity gains and economic effects to the sector. Furthermore, producers' and consumer's perception of aquaculture selective breeding methods, technologies and products should be

• considered. A training component will ensure efficient transfer of knowledge and technology towards relevant end-users (scientists, breeders and producers).



• - The requested European Union contribution shall not exceed EUR 6 000 000 per proposal.

• - The estimated EU contribution going to SMEs shall be at least 25 % of the total requested EU contribution. This will be assessed at the end of the negotiation, before signature of the Grant Agreement.

• - The duration of the proposed project shall be minimum 4 years.


• Expected impact: The project will provide knowledge and tools for boosting the development of breeding programmes in the European finfish farming sector. It will contribute in the production of fish with traits of interest (according to the biological, physiological and

environmental challenges faced by each species concerned and in particular those related to disease prevention). It will make possible gain in productivity and/or reduction of production costs through selection. It will contribute to the optimization of selection

strategies/programmes for the species concerned and will provide measurable estimates of biological and economical benefits from the methods/tools/selection strategies implemented.

24

WP KBBE (4)


• EVALUATION DE L’AQUACULTURE BIOLOGIQUE DANS LA PERSPECTIVE DE CONTRIBUER A DE

FUTURES DIRECTIVES EUROPEENNES

• KBBE.2013.1.2-11: Assessment of organic aquaculture for further development of European regulatory framework

• Call: FP7-KBBE-2013-7 – single stage

• Organic aquaculture is a relatively young market segment, which as of 2009 is regulated at the EU level (EC Regulation 710/2009). An assessment of existing research is needed together with few

targeted studies on specific issues related to the implementation of the aforementioned regulation. The aim of this project is to enhance the economic development of organic aquaculture and

strengthen the science base of the existing regulatory framework to support a possible future revision of this regulation (currently planned for 2013). Proposals should identify the issues that need

to be addressed and focus on the review of new and existing knowledge from previous and on-going EU, regional and national projects. The relevance of their outputs in relation to the

implementation of the organic aquaculture regulation will be assessed. Among others, particular emphasis will be given to issues related to farmed species health and veterinary treatments, fish

welfare, optimal slaughtering procedures, as well as, to issues related to nutrition and sustainable feeds for aquatic animals farmed under organic production conditions. Furthermore, issues such as

stocking density and sourcing organic juveniles need attention. Production - environment interactions need to be analysed to uncover thresholds for an eco-functional intensity of organic

production in line with organic farming principles. Closed recirculation systems as discussed in the context of the Codex Alimentarius Guidelines on organic production should be also looked at.

Socioeconomic investigations of the relationship between organic certification and competitiveness as well as studies on consumer perceptions and sentiments are necessary to guide farmers,

regulators, policy makers as well as market actors towards the acceptance of this innovative new sector and to promote its further development. The project will explore the relationship between

organic certification (and other certification schemes) and competitiveness of the European aquaculture sector, as well as, the potential for further development of European organic aquaculture in

the context of the global seafood market.

• Funding scheme: Coordination and Support action (supporting action).


• - The requested European Union contribution shall not exceed EUR 1 500 000 per proposal. • - The duration of the project shall be minimum three years.


• Expected impact: Providing scientific advice on the relevant regulatory framework, the project will contribute to the further economic growth of this aquaculture segment. The results will create a

scientific basis for a possible future revision of the EU rules for organic aquaculture taking into account different fish species and production systems. The outputs of the project should contribute in

reassessing the relevance, measurability and applicability of the technical provisions of the regulation and will contribute in providing science based recommendations for potential updates.

Consumer confidence for aquaculture products will improve based on the broad dissemination of the obtained scientific knowledge and good communication from stakeholders.

25

WP KBBE (6)

Activity 2.3 Life sciences, biotechnology & biochemistry for sustainable non-food products and processes

• Un ERA-Net sur les biotechnologies : KBBE.2013.3.2-01: Marine biotechnology ERA-NET Voir sur ce sujet l’appel : FP7-ERANET-2013-RTD

• TRANSFORMATION DES ALGUES EN BIOFUEL, VALORISATION

• KBBE.2013.3.2-02: The CO2 algae biorefinery • Call: FP7-KBBE-2013-7 – single stage • Algae represent a promising alternative to convert CO2 (e.g. from the atmosphere of capture in industrial processes) into high added-value products and biofuels. Algae biorefineries can

thus alleviate food versus fuel conflicts and may become particularly advantageous for regions with limited biomass availability and land unusable for agriculture. • The topic aims at developing innovative approaches to tackle the major challenges intrinsic to the development of the algae biorefineries. The proposals under this topic should focus on

the production of high value-added products such as polymers, pharmaceuticals, high value oils and chemicals, bioactive compounds, colorants, etc. The potential integration with other processes (such as the production of biofuels, water treatment or carbon sequestration) and the valorisation of all products should be considered to assure the economic, environmental and social viability of the whole concept.

• Strong weight will be put on industrial leadership of the projects. They should include the development of suitable algal strains and cultivation parameters. Boundaries to this aim include algal biodiversity exploration (bioprospecting, natural growing conditions), improvement of photosynthetic efficiency, customising and maximising added value products‘ yields and development of algae cultivation methods adapted to mass production. Design and development of different cultivation systems with innovative and efficient configurations should also be included together with sustainable downstream processes such as harvesting, dewatering, product extraction, purification, formulation as well as its integrated conversion.

• Projects should include demonstration activities to prove the techno-economic viability of the proposed concept. The overall sustainability approach (e.g. water and energy saving) as well as its Life Cycle Assessment should be critical elements of the project.

• Funding Scheme: Collaborative Project (large-scale integrating project targeted to SMEs). • Additional eligibility criterion: The estimated EU contribution going to SMEs shall be at least 25% of the total requested EU contribution. This will be assessed at the end of the

negotiation, before the signature of the Grant Agreement. • Additional information: • - This topic represents a major effort to support innovation in the European Marine and Industrial Biotechnology sectors, enhance competitiveness of the European biotechnology

industries and provide a considerable effort to the European Bio-economy. • - The topic aims at financing a limited number of large collaborative projects within an overall maximum budget of EUR 20 000 000. • Expected Impact: Delivering a robust scientific and technological basis for substantiating strategic decisions for the industrial development of algae for high added-value products. The

integrated production of biofuels and other bulk products such as food and feed proteins and fertilisers together with the targeted high value added products can increase the cost competitiveness of the biorefinery concept. The projects will as well strengthen the competitiveness of the European marine biotechnology industry and by reducing technical bottlenecks in this area making the whole sector more attractive to investment by the biotechnology industry.

26

WP ENERGY

FP7-ENERGY-2012-ERA-Nets (Budget non précisé : ? M€)

ERA Nets ACTIONS HORIZONTALES

10.1: ERA-Nets et soutien aux programmes intégrés de recherche

10.1.3. Soutenir la coordination des activités de recherche nationales des États membres et des États associés dans le domaine de l’énergie de l’OCÉAN (ERA-NET)

Objet : Coordination et réseautage des organisations impliqués dans la recherche sur l’énergie des océans au niveau national afin d’élaborer une programmation conjointe et lancer des appels à propositions

Impact : améliorer des synergies et renforcer la collaboration au sein d'un secteur dispersé

Critères : destiné aux organisations gestionnaires des programmes nationaux de financement et conducteurs de recherche

27

WP ENERGY (2)

FP7-ENERGY-2013-OCEAN (inclus dans 2012-1) 2 : Electricité d’origine renouvelable

2.6. Énergie marines

2.6.1: Développement des outils techno et recherche nécessaire à la conversion de l’énergie des océans

Objet : R&D relative à la répartition des moorings, ancrages, fondations, opérations et maintenance, système de développement de système électrique plus important, optimisation des technologies. Cela passe par la modélisation des systèmes de contrôle et la gestion des impacts environnementaux. Les solutions devront être applicables à différents composants et sur des sites distincts

Impact : Proposer un équilibre par rapport à l’énergie éolienne qui est plus connue (seuils d’efficacité, nuisances…) ; ce qui permettra une complémentarité

Collaborative Project, One project

28

La Mer dans H2020

• Advisory group on environment (incl. Climate Chg.) last report (oct. 2011) to support the EU 2020 vision :

• Thermal contents of the oceans : -Réchauffement des océans : dans de plus grandes proportions et dans de plus grandes profondeurs (4000 m) -Augmentation du niveau de la mer dans des estimations à affiner (modèles actuels sous estimés ou à perfectionner) -Meilleures prévisions des interactions océan-terre-climat -Conséquences sur les organismes marins et la biodiversité à toutes les profondeurs -Changements brutaux pour les organismes et ecosystèmes de surface due aux changements de courants et de niveau des eaux -Conséquences de l’élévation de la température sur les éléments nutritifs et les polluants : changement dans les structures chimiques et conséquences sur l’environnement de nouvelles combinaisons chimiques

29

Comparaison FP7/H2020 Structure H2020 2014-2020

• H2020 : une organisation en 3 piliers ou 3 priorités :

1 Renforcer l’excellence scientifique

2 Développer un leadership industriel

3 Relever les défis sociétaux

30

Comparaison FP7/H2020 Structure H2020

Priorité 3 : Défis de société 31 M Euros (sur 90,4 M H2020) dont : 35% du budget H2020 consacré à des dépenses liées au climat

• 1 Santé, changement démographique et bien‐être (26 % ‐8 M) • 2 Transports intelligents, verts et intégrés (21% ‐ 6,8 M) • 3 Sécurité alimentaire, agriculture durable et bio économie (13% ‐

4,1M) • 4 Des sociétés inclusives, innovantes et sûres (12% ‐ 3,8M) • 5 Changement climatique, gestion efficace des ressources et

matières premières (10% ‐ 3,1M) • Énergie sûre, propre et efficace (1,7 M EURO de financement

additionnel pour la sureté & sécurité nucléaire des activités liées au traité Euratom. N’inclut pas ITER – 18% ‐ 5,7 M)

31


Changement climatique, gestion efficace des ressources et matières premières (10% ‐ 3,1M) 5 grandes lignes d’activité : 5.1 Combattre le changement climatique et s’y adapter 5.2 Gérer les ressources naturelles et les écosystèmes de manière durable 5.3 Garantir un approvisionnement durable en matières premières non énergétiques et non agricoles 5.4 Garantir la transition vers une économie « verte » grâce à l’éco-innovation 5.5 Développer des systèmes complets et soutenus d’observation et d’information à l’échelle mondiale en matière d’environnement

32


• Nette évolution FP7/H2020

-On passe à des objectifs beaucoup plus économiques alors que le FP7 est plus tourné vers le développement durable et l’environnement

-L’environnement et donc Mer/Océan devient un thème beaucoup plus transversal et peut se retrouver dans beaucoup de thématiques sous différents aspects : agri, énerg., transp., matériaux, sécu., sté.

-D’autres parties du programme contribuent directement aux recherches environnementales : ERC, Infra., TIC, Marie Curie

33

Mer-Océan comparaison FP7/H2020

34

H2020 PCRD 7

5.1 a Combattre le chgt. Climatique et s’y adapter 6.1 Chgts. Climatiques, pollution&risques

5.2 b Gérer les ressources naturelles et les écosystèmes de manière durable

6.2 Gestion durable des ressources 2.2 Gestion des environnements marins

5.3 c Garantir un approvisionnement durable en matières premières non énergétiques et non agricoles

Nouveau

5.4 d Garantir la transition vers une économie « verte » grâce à l’éco-innovation

6.3 Ecotechnologies

5.5 e Développer des systèmes complets et soutenus d’observation et d’information à l’échelle mondiale en matière d’environnement

6.4 Observation de la terre et outils d’évaluation 4.1 Systèmes d’observation de la terre et des océans et méthodes de surveillance de l’environnement

Du Public au Privé, De l’académique aux end users

• 1995 : Création Cnes, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Météo-France, Shom

• 2001 : Premier bulletin d’océanographie opérationnelle (Prévisions courants et salinité dans l’atlantique J-15 puis t°, courants

surface/profondeur, Hauteur Mer, Couche de mélanges)

• 2002 : Création GIP Mercator

• 2003 : Renforcement du service aux utilisateurs et abonnements aux services, diffusion des produits, contacts avec le public…

• 2009 : My Ocean : CE confie à MERCATOR le Marine Core Service au sein de GMES (My Ocean2 mars 2012).

• 2010 : Société Civile de droit privé.

• 2011 : 1er atelier des utilisateurs de Mercator (scientifiques, applications commerciales, institutions)

Ce système produit une information océanique répondant à des besoins d’acteurs nationaux, communautaires et internationaux:

• Politiques de l’environnement

• Sécurité maritime

• Défense

• Gestion des ressources marines

• Développement durable

• Procure à la communauté scientifique un outil et des services d’appuis au bénéfice de sa recherche en matière océanographique.

• Contribue au développement des applications commerciales de l’océanographie et de sa filière.

http://www.mercator-ocean.fr/fre/

35









Type de positionnement Mer dans le futur

36

Changement climatique Envir. Marins

Economie maritime et

activités humaines

Infra humaines et technologies transversales

Ex : Chgt. Climatique

sur les zones côtières

Ex. Nourritures (de la mer)

saines

Ex. Impact du chgt climatique sur les

océans

Observation/Recherche des océans & data

infra

Merci de votre attention

[email protected] [email protected]

PCN Environnement CNRS-INSU

37

www.pcn-environnement.fr

Portail du participant du 7ème PCRD et prog. de travail : http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home

Service recherche de partenaires : http://cordis.europa.eu/partners/web/guest/home

mailto:[email protected]









http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home

https://cordis.europa.eu/partners/web/guest/home