lec4joe

15
1.253 Transportation Policy & Environmental Limits Lecture 4 Who To Regulate: The Car, The Driver or Mandate Technological Change

Upload: dr-ir-r-didin-kusdian-mt

Post on 30-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 1/14

1.253Transportation Policy

& Environmental LimitsLecture 4

Who To Regulate:The Car, The Driver or

Mandate Technological Change

Page 2: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 2/14

Automobile TransportationDefining the Problem• Congestion• Oil dependence & the

economy

• Oil Dependence & national defense

• Air, water, noise pollution• Resource allocation

• Safety• Equity

Page 3: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 3/14

Policy Life Cycle

Specification Expansion

Initiation

Implementation

Containment

Entrance

FormalAgenda Public

Agenda

Page 4: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 4/14

Policy Causal ModelsMultiple & Simultaneous

CausationX1

X2

Xn

• Land use

• Corporate marketingY • Inadequate funding of alternatives

• Structural bias in favor of road-building, etc.

Page 5: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 5/14

Policy Causal ModelsSequential Causation

X1 X2 Y

• Increase funds for highway building•Marketing of auto use

•Changes to land use

•Result – auto dependence

Page 6: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 6/14

Policy Causal ModelsComponent Causation

X1

X2

Y

• Transportation “chicken& egg problem, land use first

or infrastructure?

Page 7: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 7/14

ExpansionTransportation Blame Game

• Who is to blame?- auto companies

- transportation

industry, e.g., road builders, oil industry,etc.

- drivers

Page 8: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 8/14

Containment• Deflect blame, look elsewhere, e.g., point

source pollution, landdevelopment.

• Deny, technology notyet availability.

• Demonstrate harm, e.g. economiccompetitiveness, jobs,safety.

Page 9: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 9/14

Entrance to the Public Agenda• Crowded space, mustcompete with other 

issues – even ‘reality

TV.’• Limited time to makecomplicated

arguments, policy bysound bite.

Page 10: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 10/14

Formal Agenda• State legislature,courts, congress.

• Fragmented decision

making, geographyand legal jurisdictions.

• Limited time and

attention.

Page 11: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 11/14

Regulating the Car • 1963 Clean Air Act, air quality mandate• 1965 Emission standards for new cars

1966 Safety (Nader/NHTSA) HEW emission standards for all cars.• 1968 First emission standards take place•

1970 EPA created, Earth Day, mandated 90% reduction inauto emissions by ’75-76• 1975 CAFÉ requiring 27.5 mph by 1985• 1978 First CAFÉ standard takes affect, 18.5 mpg• 1985 Reagan Admin reduces CAFÉ to 26• 1989 Bush Admin sets CAFÉ at 27.5

1990 Clean Air Act, more emission reductions, clean fuels,longer warranties on pollution control equipment

Page 12: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 12/14

US Regulatory Rulemaking ProcessCongressional Executive Interprets Data collection &

Decision Making Congressional Outreach to

(low public visibility) Intent stakeholders

 NPRM “Final” Notice of Proposed

Hearings Rule-making

Rule-Making

Page 13: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 13/14

Implementation• Problems do not fitneatly in any one

 jurisdiction.

• Large variation inauthority and capacity.

• Ambiguous language

from legislature

Page 14: lec4joe

8/9/2019 lec4joe

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lec4joe 14/14

Regulating the Driver • Fuel prices• Transportation

demand management

measures, HOV lanes,restricted use, etc.

• Employer incentives and disincentives

• Land use reforms