f2fluidisation

Upload: benjamin-jie

Post on 02-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    1/28

    Content Page

    Content Page Number

    1. INTRODUCTION

    1.1 Aim of Experiment1.2 Background Information

    1.2.1 Packed Bed

    1.2.2 Minimum Fluidization Velocity1.2. !"eoretical Approac"

    3-7

    ##$%

    2. MATERIALS AND PROCEDURE

    2.1 Material& and E'uipment

    2.2 Additional Experimental Information2. (afety Precaution&

    2.# Procedure&

    -!

    )

    )*

    *

    3. CALCULATION AND RESULT 1"-21

    #. DISCUSSION#.1 +ompari&on of Experimental re&ult&

    #.2 Error Analy&i. Impro,ement for t"i& experiment

    22-2$22$2-

    22%

    $. CONCLUSION 27

    %. RE&ERENCES 2

    APPENDICES A' atta()e*

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    2/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    1. INTRODUCTION

    1.1. A+m o, Eer+ment

    !"e aim of t"i& experiment to &tudy t"e follo/ing&0

    a. Mec"ani&m of fluidi&ation and atc" fluidi&ation in a &olid$fluid &y&tem.

    . Effect of &uperficial fluid ,elocity on t"e ed c"aracteri&tic& and t"e pre&&ure drop

    acro&& t"e ed.

    c. Effect of particle &ize on t"e minimum fluidi&ation ,elocity and t"e terminal

    &ettling ,elocity.

    1.2. /a(0groun* In,ormat+on

    1.2.1. Pa(0e* /e*

    A packed ed i& u&ually a "ollo/ cylindrical ,e&&el u&ually a pipe or tue t"at i& randomly filled

    /it" packing material. !"ey may al&o contain catalytic particle& or ad&orent&. Packed ed& are

    typically utilized to impro,e contact et/een t/o p"a&e& $ for our experiment &olid and fluid.

    !ype& of packed ed include packed ed reactor& $ tuular reactor& filled /it" &olid cataly&t&.

    !"e&e are fre'uently u&ed to catalyze ga& reaction&. !"e ad,antage of u&ing packed ed reactor&

    i& a "ig"er con,er&ion compared to ot"er catalytic reactor& per unit /eig"t of cataly&t. !"e

    reaction take& place on t"e expo&ed &urface& of t"e cataly&t. Anot"er type of packed ed i& a

    packed column u&ed for &eparation proce&&e& &uc" a& a&orption &tripping and di&tillation. !"e

    de&ign of packed ed a&ed unit operation& i& "ig"ly influenced y t"e packing matrix /"ic" i&

    in turn go,erned y t"e morp"ology and dimen&ion& of t"e particle&. 3ptimum de&ign of

    particle& can oo&t catalytic acti,ity and tran&port p"enomena of t"e &y&tem. Farication co&t&

    and re&i&tance to p"y&ical /ear and tear are factor& t"at al&o &"ould e taken into account.

    2

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    3/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    1.2.2 M+n+mum &u+*+at+on eo(+t4

    Flo/ t"roug" a packed ed can e regarded a& fluid flo/ pa&t &ome numer of &umerged

    o4ect&. In mo&t ca&e& t"e o4ect& are uniform &p"erical particle& of diameter 5 (V. 6"en t"ere i&

    no flo/ t"roug" t"e packed ed t"e net gra,itational force act& do/n/ard. 6"en flo/ egin&

    up/ard friction force& act up/ard and counteralance t"e net gra,itational force. For a "ig"

    enoug" fluid ,elocity t"e friction force i& large enoug" to lift t"e particle&. At t"e on&et of

    incipient fluidization 7packed ed ecome& fluidized8 t"e &uperficial fluid ,elocity i& kno/n a&

    t"e minimum fluidization ,elocity 9mf. 9mfincrea&e& /it" particle &ize and particle den&ity and i&

    affected y fluid propertie&.

    1.2.3 T)eoret+(a Aroa()

    6"en a packed ed of particle& i& &u4ected to a &ufficient "ig" up/ard ,elocity flo/ of fluid a

    point i& reac" /"en t"e particle& are lifted y t"e fluid t"e &eparation of t"e particle& increa&e&

    and t"e ed ecome& fluidized. !"e /eig"t of t"e particle& i& &upported y t"e drag force exerted

    y t"e fluid on t"e particle& and t"e particle& ecome freely &u&pended or fluidized.

    6"en t"e fluid flo/ed t"roug" t"e ed of particle& t"ere i& a pre&&ure lo&& in t"e fluid due to t"e

    frictional re&i&tance increa&e& /it" increa&ing fluid flo/. At t"e point of fluidization t"e up/ard

    drag force exerted y t"e fluid on t"e particle& ecome e'ual to t"e apparent /eig"t of t"e

    particle& in t"e ed. !"e &uperficial fluid ,elocity at /"ic" t"e packed ed ecome& a fluidized

    ed i& kno/n a& t"e minimum fluidization ,elocity

    A force alance acro&& t"e fluidized ed can e expre&&ed a& follo/

    gAHPA mffpmf = 1 718

    6"ere :P ; Pre&&ure drop acro&& t"e ed

    A ; +ro&&$&ectional area of ed

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    4/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    p ; ?en&ity of particle&

    f ; ?en&ity of fluid

    3r

    ( )( )gH

    Pfpmf

    mf

    =

    1 728

    !o deri,e an e'uation for minimum fluidization ,elocity umf. 6e can e'uate t"e expre&&ion for

    pre&&ure lo&& in a fluidized ed 7E'n. 18 /it" t"e expre&&ion for pre&&ure lo&& acro&& a packed

    ed. !"e Ergun e'uation i& u&ed for all type& of flo/ in packed ed.

    psps D

    u

    D

    u

    H

    P

    2

    2

    2 817

    %-.1

    817

    1-@

    +

    =

    78

    6"ere > ; Bed ,oid fraction

    & ; &"ape factor

    ?p ; particle &ize

    u ; (uperficial li'uid ,elocity

    ; Ci'uid ,i&co&ity

    < ; Bed "eig"t

    By e'uating t"e expre&&ion of Ergun e'uation /it" t"e pre&&ure lo&& at t"e point of incipient

    fluidization a 'uadratic e'uation for minimum fluidization ,elocity umfi& otained.

    ps

    mff

    mf

    mf

    ps

    mf

    mf

    mf

    fsmf

    D

    u

    D

    ug

    2

    22

    2 817%-.1

    8171-@88717

    +

    =

    7#8

    For &mall particle& only t"e laminar flo/ term of Ergun e'uation i& &ignificant. !"e e'uation for

    minimum fluidization ,elocity /"en Dep2@

    4

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    5/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    =

    mf

    mffsps

    mf

    gDu

    11-@

    22

    7-8

    In ,ie/ of large particle& t"e laminar flo/ term /ill ecome negligile and u mf ,arie& /it"

    &'uare root of t"e particle &ize. !"e e'uation for Dep1@@@

    ( ) 2=1%-.1

    =

    f

    mffsps

    mf

    gDu

    78

    !"roug" plot of pre&&ure drop acro&& t"e ed again&t flo/rate or t"e &uperficial ,elocity 7a&

    &"o/n elo/ in Figure.1 t"e minimum fluidization ,elocity could t"e otained grap"ically.

    Figure.1: Example of a fluidization plot

    5

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    6/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    At fir&t /"en t"ere i& no flo/ t"e pre&&ure drop zero and t"e ed "a& a certain "eig"t. A& /e

    proceed along t"e rig"t arro/ in t"e direction of increa&ing &uperficial ,elocity tracing t"e pat"

    AB+? t"e pre&&ure drop gradually increa&e& /"ile t"e ed "eig"t remain& fixed. !"i& i& a region

    /"ere t"e Ergun e'uation for a packed ed can e u&ed to relate t"e pre&&ure drop to t"e ,elocity.

    6"en t"e point B i& reac"ed t"e ed &tart& expanding in "eig"t /"ile t"e pre&&ure drop le,el& off

    and no longer increa&e& a& t"e &uperficial ,elocity i& increa&ed. !"i& i& /"en t"e up/ard force

    exerted y t"e fluid on t"e particle& i& &ufficient to alance t"e net /eig"t of t"e ed and t"e

    particle& egin to &eparate from eac" ot"er and float in t"e fluid. A& t"e ,elocity i& increa&ed

    furt"er t"e ed continue& to expand in "eig"t ut t"e pre&&ure drop &tay& con&tant. It i& po&&ile

    to reac" large &uperficial ,elocitie& /it"out "a,ing t"e particle& carried out /it" t"e fluid at t"e

    exit. !"i& i& ecau&e t"e &ettling ,elocitie& of t"e particle& are typically muc" larger t"an t"e

    large&t &uperficial ,elocitie& u&ed.

    After fluidization it &ettle& ack into a more loo&ely packed &tate0 t"i& i& /"y t"e con&tant ed

    "eig"t on t"e return loop i& larger t"an t"e ed "eig"t in t"e initial &tate. If /e no/ repeat t"e

    experiment y increa&ing t"e &uperficial ,elocity from zero /eGll follo/ t"e &et of cur,e& E+?

    in ot" direction&. Becau&e of t"i& rea&on /e define t"e ,elocity at t"e point + in t"e figure a&

    t"e m+n+mum ,u+*+at+on 5eo(+t4 V.

    6

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    7/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    2. MATERIALS 6 PROCEDURE

    2.1. Mater+a' 6 Eu+ment

    A &et of t"ree gla&& column& 7-.@) cm I?8 packed /it" &p"erical gla&& ead& of different diameter

    &ize& [email protected] 1mm mm8.

    Mater+a' 6 Eu+ment 8uant+t4

    Fluidization &etup 2 rotameter /it" different ad4u&tale flo/ rate& 2 differential

    pre&&ure meter& and 1 pump for eac" column a total of

    column containing particle& of different &ize&

    (H ottle& and particle& (e,eral ottle& and an ade'uate 'uantity of particle& for

    determining of particle den&ity /ere i&&ued

    Mettler P@@@ /eig" &cale 1 7for /eig"ing of particle /eig"t8

    Caoratory drying o,en 1 7for e,aporation of /et ottle& and particle&8

    Table 1: Materials and Equipment for Fluidization experiment

    2.2. A**+t+ona Eer+menta In,ormat+on

    1 ?iameter of column& - cm

    2 6eig"t of packed ed in column 1 ** g

    6eig"t of packed ed in column 2 * g

    # 6eig"t of packed ed in column )1 g

    - ?en&ity of /ater at 2@ o+ **).2 Jg=m

    Vi&co&ity of /ater at 2@ o+ *.* x 1@$#

    Table 2: Given information for calculation in Fluidization experiment

    7

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    8/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    2.3. Sa,et4 Pre(aut+on

    +are mu&t e taken /"en ad4u&ting t"e flo/ rate of t"e fluid to pre,ent t"e o,erflo/ of fluid

    and fluidized ed.

    Additional precaution& to e o&er,ed during mea&urement of particle den&itie& u&ing

    &pecific gra,ity ottle& and petri di&"e&. Hla&&/are may reak /"en not "andled /it" care

    and do not touc" t"e roken piece& /it" are "and in t"e e,ent of reakage.

    ?uring t"e experiment no one &"ould attempt to di&a&&emling or di&mantling any part& of

    t"e experimental &etup. A& t"i& experiment in,ol,ed /orking fluid running at "ig" ,elocity

    /"ic" may e cau&e unde&irale effect& /"en not "andled properly.

    2.#. Pro(e*ure

    1. !"e initial "eig"t of packed ed in column 1 /a& recorded.

    2. !"e needle ,alue connecting to column 1 /a& cracked open.

    . Flo/ rate /a& increa&ed &lo/ly at le&& t"an or e'ual to @.1 C=min inter,al&.

    #. Flo/ rate inlet pre&&ure outlet pre&&ure and ed "eig"t /ere recoded.-. Flo/ rate /a& increa&ed till con&ecuti,e delta P /ere otained and &lo/ly ad4u&t ack to

    zero at le&& t"an or e'ual to @.1 C=min decrement.

    . (tep& 1 to - /ere repeated for column 2 and .%. Empty /eig"t of a 2- ml &pecific gra,ity 7(H8 ottle /a& mea&ured and recorded.

    ). !"e (H ottle /a& filled /it" column 1 pack ed material to approximately 1= of it& ,olume

    and /eig"ed.

    *. 6ater /a& introduced to t"e (H ottle to fill up t"e 2- ml ottle and final /eig"t /a&

    mea&ured.1@. Mea&ured &ample particle& and /ater /ere poured into a petri di&" and placed in o,en for

    drying.

    11. (tep& % to 1@ /ere repeated for column 2 and particle&.

    K(H ottle mu&t e capped /"ene,er it& /eig"t i& eing mea&ured

    3. CALCULATIONS 6 TA/ULATION

    .1 !alculation for column 1

    8

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    9/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    ; .@- g=cm;@- Jg=m

    Q(L/min)

    Pin Pout P (Psi) P (Pa) H (m) U (m/s)Porosi

    y

    0.00 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.00 0.344 0.000000 0.53

    0.10 2.30 2.19 0.11 758.42 0.344 0.000849 0.53

    0.20 2.44 2.19 0.25 1723.69 0.344 0.001699 0.53

    0.25 2.49 2.19 0.30 2068.43 0.344 0.002123 0.53

    0.30 2.55 2.19 0.36 2482.11 0.345 0.002548 0.53

    0.35 2.60 2.19 0.41 2826.85 0.347 0.002972 0.54

    0.40 2.62 2.19 0.43 2964.75 0.350 0.003397 0.54

    0.45 2.62 2.20 0.42 2895.80 0.355 0.003822 0.55

    0.50 2.62 2.20 0.42 2895.80 0.361 0.004246 0.55

    0.55 2.63 2.20 0.43 2964.75 0.368 0.004671 0.56

    0.50 2.62 2.20 0.42 2895.80 0.360 0.004246 0.55

    0.45 2.62 2.19 0.43 2964.75 0.353 0.003822 0.54

    0.40 2.59 2.20 0.39 2688.96 0.349 0.003397 0.54

    0.35 2.55 2.19 0.36 2482.11 0.347 0.002972 0.54

    0.30 2.50 2.19 0.31 2137.38 0.346 0.002548 0.53

    0.25 2.39 2.19 0.20 1378.95 0.346 0.002123 0.53

    0.10 2.28 2.19 0.09 620.53 0.346 0.000849 0.53

    0.00 2.22 2.19 0.03 206.84 0.346 0.000000 0.53

    Table : Tabulated results column 1 of glass bead size ="."#cm

    9

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    10/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    Figure :$lot of 9P 5' 'uer,+(+a 5eo(+t4 Ufor column 1

    From Figure t"e minimum fluidization ,elocity 9mfi& @.@@*% m=&

    Figure %: $lot of be* )e+g)t : 5' 'uer,+(+a 5eo(+t4 Ufor column 1

    From Figure # t"e ed "eig"t at minimum fluidization

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    11/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    Figure #: $lot of oro'+t4 ; 5' 'uer,+(+a 5eo(+t4 Ufor column 1

    From Figure - t"e poro&ity at minimum fluidization >mf ; @.-# m

    !"erefore t"eoretical pre&&ure drop for column 1 can e calculated y u&ing e'uationL

    And t"e t"eoretical minimum fluidization ,elocity 9mf for column 1 can e otain y u&ing

    Ergun e'uationL

    11

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    12/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    6"ere

    9mfcan t"en e otained y &ol,ing 'uadratic e'uation

    !"eoretical 9mffor column 1 ; @.@1@ m=&

    .2 !alculation for column 2

    =2.#-# g=cm;2#-# Jg=m

    Q(L/min)

    Pin Pout P (Psi) P (Pa) H (m) U (m/s)Porosi

    y

    0 2.20 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.353 0.000000 0.43

    0.1 2.22 2.21 0.01 68.95 0.353 0.000849 0.43

    0.2 2.23 2.21 0.02 137.90 0.353 0.001699 0.43

    0.3 2.25 2.21 0.04 275.79 0.353 0.002548 0.43

    0.4 2.27 2.21 0.06 413.69 0.353 0.003397 0.43

    0.5 2.28 2.21 0.07 482.63 0.353 0.004246 0.43

    0.55 2.29 2.21 0.08 551.58 0.353 0.004671 0.43

    0.6 2.30 2.21 0.09 620.53 0.353 0.005096 0.43

    0.65 2.31 2.21 0.10 689.48 0.353 0.005520 0.43

    0.7 2.32 2.21 0.11 758.42 0.353 0.005945 0.43

    12

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    13/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    0.75 2.33 2.21 0.12 827.37 0.353 0.006369 0.43

    0.8 2.34 2.21 0.13 896.32 0.353 0.006794 0.43

    0.85 2.35 2.21 0.14 965.27 0.353 0.007219 0.43

    0.9 2.36 2.21 0.15 1034.21 0.353 0.007643 0.43

    0.95 2.37 2.21 0.16 1103.16 0.353 0.008068 0.43

    1 2.38 2.21 0.17 1172.11 0.353 0.008493 0.43

    1.05 2.39 2.21 0.18 1241.06 0.353 0.008917 0.43

    1.1 2.40 2.21 0.19 1310.00 0.353 0.009342 0.43

    1.15 2.41 2.21 0.20 1378.95 0.353 0.009766 0.43

    1.2 2.42 2.21 0.21 1447.90 0.353 0.010191 0.43

    1.25 2.43 2.21 0.22 1516.85 0.353 0.010616 0.43

    1.3 2.44 2.21 0.23 1585.79 0.353 0.011040 0.43

    1.35 2.45 2.21 0.24 1654.74 0.353 0.011465 0.43

    1.4 2.46 2.21 0.25 1723.69 0.353 0.011890 0.43

    1.45 2.47 2.21 0.26 1792.64 0.353 0.012314 0.43

    1.5 2.49 2.21 0.28 1930.53 0.353 0.012739 0.43

    1.55 2.51 2.21 0.30 2068.43 0.353 0.013163 0.43

    1.6 2.52 2.21 0.31 2137.38 0.353 0.013588 0.43

    1.65 2.53 2.21 0.32 2206.32 0.353 0.014013 0.43

    1.7 2.54 2.21 0.33 2275.27 0.353 0.014437 0.43

    1.75 2.56 2.21 0.35 2413.17 0.353 0.014862 0.43

    1.8 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.353 0.015287 0.43

    1.85 2.58 2.21 0.37 2551.06 0.353 0.015711 0.43

    1.9 2.59 2.21 0.38 2620.01 0.353 0.016136 0.43

    1.95 2.60 2.21 0.39 2688.96 0.353 0.016561 0.43

    2 2.61 2.21 0.40 2757.90 0.353 0.016985 0.43

    2.05 2.62 2.21 0.41 2826.85 0.359 0.017410 0.44

    2.1 2.62 2.21 0.41 2826.85 0.360 0.017834 0.44

    2.15 2.62 2.21 0.41 2826.85 0.362 0.018259 0.45

    2.1 2.62 2.21 0.41 2826.85 0.359 0.017834 0.44

    2.05 2.61 2.21 0.40 2757.90 0.358 0.017410 0.44

    2 2.61 2.21 0.40 2757.90 0.355 0.016985 0.44

    1.95 2.60 2.21 0.39 2688.96 0.353 0.016561 0.43

    1.9 2.59 2.21 0.38 2620.01 0.352 0.016136 0.43

    1.85 2.59 2.21 0.38 2620.01 0.351 0.015711 0.43

    1.8 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.351 0.015287 0.43

    1.75 2.56 2.21 0.35 2413.17 0.351 0.014862 0.43

    1.7 2.55 2.21 0.34 2344.22 0.350 0.014437 0.43

    1.65 2.54 2.21 0.33 2275.27 0.349 0.014013 0.43

    1.6 2.52 2.21 0.31 2137.38 0.349 0.013588 0.43

    1.55 2.51 2.21 0.30 2068.43 0.349 0.013163 0.43

    13

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    14/28

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    15/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    Figure ': $lot of be* )e+g)t : 5' 'uer,+(+a 5eo(+t4 Ufor column 2

    From Figure % t"e ed "eig"t at minimum fluidization

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    16/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    !"erefore t"eoretical pre&&ure drop for column 2 can e calculated y u&ing e'uation

    And t"e t"eoretical minimum fluidization ,elocity 9mffor column 2 can e otain y u&ing

    Ergun e'uation &"o/n pre,iou&ly

    9mfcan t"en e otained y &ol,ing 'uadratic e'uation

    !"eoretical 9mffor column 2 ; @.@@#) m=&

    . !alculation for column

    =2.#- g=cm;2#- Jg=m

    Q(L/min)

    Pin Pout P (Psi) P (Pa) H (m) U (m/s)Porosi

    y

    0.00 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.00 0.310 0.000000 0.42

    0.10 2.20 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.310 0.000849 0.42

    0.20 2.20 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.310 0.001699 0.42

    16

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    17/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    0.30 2.21 2.20 0.01 68.95 0.310 0.002548 0.42

    0.40 2.21 2.20 0.01 68.95 0.310 0.003397 0.42

    0.50 2.22 2.20 0.02 137.90 0.310 0.004246 0.42

    0.60 2.22 2.20 0.02 137.90 0.310 0.005096 0.42

    0.70 2.22 2.20 0.02 137.90 0.310 0.005945 0.42

    0.80 2.23 2.20 0.03 206.84 0.310 0.006794 0.42

    0.90 2.23 2.20 0.03 206.84 0.310 0.007643 0.42

    1.00 2.24 2.20 0.04 275.79 0.310 0.008493 0.42

    1.10 2.24 2.20 0.04 275.79 0.310 0.009342 0.42

    1.20 2.25 2.20 0.05 344.74 0.310 0.010191 0.42

    1.30 2.25 2.20 0.05 344.74 0.310 0.011040 0.42

    1.40 2.26 2.20 0.06 413.69 0.310 0.011890 0.42

    1.50 2.26 2.20 0.06 413.69 0.310 0.012739 0.42

    1.60 2.27 2.20 0.07 482.63 0.310 0.013588 0.42

    1.70 2.28 2.20 0.08 551.58 0.310 0.014437 0.42

    1.80 2.28 2.20 0.08 551.58 0.310 0.015287 0.42

    1.90 2.29 2.20 0.09 620.53 0.310 0.016136 0.42

    2.00 2.30 2.20 0.10 689.48 0.310 0.016985 0.42

    2.10 2.31 2.20 0.11 758.42 0.310 0.017834 0.42

    2.20 2.32 2.20 0.12 827.37 0.310 0.018684 0.42

    2.30 2.33 2.20 0.13 896.32 0.310 0.019533 0.42

    2.40 2.34 2.20 0.14 965.27 0.310 0.020382 0.42

    2.50 2.35 2.20 0.15 1034.21 0.310 0.021231 0.42

    2.60 2.36 2.21 0.15 1034.21 0.310 0.022081 0.42

    2.70 2.36 2.21 0.15 1034.21 0.310 0.022930 0.42

    2.80 2.38 2.21 0.17 1172.11 0.310 0.023779 0.42

    2.90 2.39 2.21 0.18 1241.06 0.310 0.024628 0.42

    3.00 2.40 2.21 0.19 1310.00 0.310 0.025478 0.42

    3.10 2.41 2.21 0.20 1378.95 0.310 0.026327 0.42

    3.20 2.42 2.21 0.21 1447.90 0.310 0.027176 0.42

    3.30 2.43 2.21 0.22 1516.85 0.310 0.028025 0.42

    3.40 2.44 2.21 0.23 1585.79 0.310 0.028875 0.42

    3.50 2.45 2.21 0.24 1654.74 0.310 0.029724 0.42

    3.60 2.46 2.21 0.25 1723.69 0.310 0.030573 0.42

    3.70 2.47 2.21 0.26 1792.64 0.310 0.031423 0.42

    3.80 2.49 2.21 0.28 1930.53 0.310 0.032272 0.42

    3.90 2.50 2.21 0.29 1999.48 0.310 0.033121 0.42

    4.00 2.51 2.21 0.30 2068.43 0.310 0.033970 0.42

    4.10 2.54 2.21 0.33 2275.27 0.310 0.034820 0.42

    4.20 2.55 2.21 0.34 2344.22 0.310 0.035669 0.42

    4.30 2.56 2.21 0.35 2413.17 0.310 0.036518 0.42

    17

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    18/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    4.40 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.310 0.037367 0.42

    4.45 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.312 0.037792 0.43

    4.50 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.313 0.038217 0.43

    4.55 2.58 2.22 0.36 2482.11 0.315 0.038641 0.43

    4.60 2.58 2.22 0.36 2482.11 0.315 0.039066 0.43

    4.55 2.58 2.21 0.37 2551.06 0.315 0.038641 0.43

    4.50 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.314 0.038217 0.43

    4.45 2.58 2.22 0.36 2482.11 0.313 0.037792 0.43

    4.40 2.58 2.21 0.37 2551.06 0.312 0.037367 0.43

    4.35 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.312 0.036943 0.43

    4.30 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.312 0.036518 0.43

    4.25 2.57 2.21 0.36 2482.11 0.311 0.036093 0.42

    4.20 2.56 2.21 0.35 2413.17 0.311 0.035669 0.42

    4.15 2.56 2.21 0.35 2413.17 0.310 0.035244 0.42

    4.10 2.54 2.21 0.33 2275.27 0.309 0.034820 0.42

    4.00 2.53 2.21 0.32 2206.32 0.309 0.033970 0.42

    3.80 2.51 2.21 0.30 2068.43 0.309 0.032272 0.42

    3.60 2.49 2.21 0.28 1930.53 0.309 0.030573 0.42

    3.40 2.47 2.21 0.26 1792.64 0.309 0.028875 0.42

    3.20 2.45 2.21 0.24 1654.74 0.309 0.027176 0.42

    3.00 2.44 2.21 0.23 1585.79 0.309 0.025478 0.42

    2.80 2.39 2.21 0.18 1241.06 0.309 0.023779 0.42

    2.60 2.37 2.20 0.17 1172.11 0.309 0.022081 0.42

    2.40 2.35 2.20 0.15 1034.21 0.309 0.020382 0.42

    2.20 2.33 2.20 0.13 896.32 0.309 0.018684 0.42

    2.00 2.32 2.20 0.12 827.37 0.309 0.016985 0.42

    1.80 2.29 2.20 0.09 620.53 0.309 0.015287 0.42

    1.60 2.27 2.20 0.07 482.63 0.309 0.013588 0.42

    1.40 2.26 2.20 0.06 413.69 0.309 0.011890 0.42

    1.00 2.24 2.20 0.04 275.79 0.309 0.008493 0.42

    0.50 2.21 2.19 0.02 137.90 0.309 0.004246 0.42

    0.00 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.00 0.309 0.000000 0.42

    Table #: Tabulated results column of glass bead size ="."cm

    18

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    19/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    Figure ): $lot of 9P 5' 'uer,+(+a 5eo(+t4 Ufor column

    From Figure * t"e minimum fluidization ,elocity 9mfi& @.@%% m=&

    Figure ': $lot of be* )e+g)t : 5' 'uer,+(+a 5eo(+t4 Ufor column 2

    From Figure % t"e ed "eig"t at minimum fluidization

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    20/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    Figure (: $lot of oro'+t4 ; 5' 'uer,+(+a 5eo(+t4 Ufor column

    From Figure ) t"e poro&ity at minimum fluidization >mf ; @.#2 m

    !"erefore t"eoretical pre&&ure drop for column can e calculated y u&ing e'uation

    And t"e t"eoretical minimum fluidization ,elocity 9mffor column can e otain y u&ing

    Ergun e'uation &"o/n pre,iou&ly

    9mfcan t"en e otained y &ol,ing 'uadratic e'uation

    !"eoretical 9mffor column ; @.@1* m=&

    20

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    21/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    21

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    22/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    #. DISCUSSION

    #.1 Comar+'on o, eer+menta re'ut'

    Experimental P (Pa)

    Theoretical P(Pa)

    Experimental Um(m/s)

    Theoretical Um(m/s)

    !olumn"

    2964.7468 3264.32 0.003397 0.0103

    !olumn#

    2826.8516 2863.13 0.017410 0.0048

    !olumn$

    2482.1136 2566.03 0.037367 0.0169

    Table &: Experimental data comparison *it+ t+eoretical values calculated using Ergun

    Equation

    From t"e ra/ data taulated and grap"& plotted it can e o&er,ed t"at t"e pre&&ure drop NP

    increa&e& /it" flo/ rate until t"e minimum fluidization ,elocity /"erey t"e ed expand& andporo&ity increa&e& and t"e pre&&ure drop remain& at t"e &ame ,alue after t"at /it" furt"er

    increment of fluid ,elocity.

    !"e ed "eig"t& initially remain t"e &ame and increa&ed at t"e minimum fluidization ,elocity and

    &tay increa&ing /it" increment in t"e fluid ,elocity a& t"e fluid drag force and uoyancy force

    "a& o,ercome t"e gra,itational force. !"e fluid ,elocity i& decrea&ed &lo/ly ack to @ C=min

    "o/e,er t"e ed "eig"t i& found &lig"tly "ig"er t"an t"eir original ,alue t"i& could e due to

    t"eir inertial force.

    A& &"o/n in t"e !ale t"e experimental pre&&ure drop& at t"e minimum fluidization for t"e

    column& are only &lig"tly lo/er a& compared to t"e t"eoretical pre&&ure drop&.

    !"e minimum fluidization ,elocitie& otained y t"e experimental data are far "ig"er t"an t"e

    t"eoretical ,alue& calculated y u&ing Ergun E'uation.

    Coumn Part+(e S+e< =mm> M+n+mum &u+*+at+on 5eo(+t4 Um, =m?'>

    1 @.- @.@@*%

    2 1 @.@1%#1@

    @.@%%

    Table ': Minimum fluidization velocit, for t+e columns

    22

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    23/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    From !ale % it i& found t"at a& t"e particle &ize increa&e& t"e minimum fluidization ,elocity

    al&o increa&e&.

    !omparison %et&een Theory (Point '!) an* Experiment (Point

    '!) !olumn " +esult

    23

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    24/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    !omparison %et&een Theory (Point '!) an* Experiment (Point

    '!) !olumn # +esult

    24

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    25/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    !omparison %et&een Theory (Point '!) an* Experiment (Point

    '!) !olumn $ +esult

    Ba&ed on t"e compari&on ao,e ot" column 1 and 2 follo/& t"e &"ape 'uite clo&ely to t"e

    t"eory.

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    26/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    t"e ,alue of @ to t"e moment it egin to fluidize.

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    27/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    #.3 Imro5ement ,or t)e eer+ment

    (ample& from flo/ rate of @ and -@ ml=min could e repeated to en&ure accuracy.

    Flo/ rate of t"e &y&tem can e c"ecked y u&ing a mea&uring cylinder and &top /atc"e&

    to confirm t"e pump& are /orking fine.

    (y&tem can e run at e,en more different flo/ rate& to otain etter correlation et/een

    t"e re&idential time and con,er&ion rate.

    $. CONCLUSION

    From t"e experimental data it can e concluded t"atL

    a. At t"e point of minimum fluidization ,elocity t"e pre&&ure drop acro&& t"e packed ed

    /ill not furt"er increa&e linearly /it" t"e &uperficial ,elocity ut /ill remain con&tant.

    . Bed "eig"t and ed ,oid fraction increa&e linearly /it" increa&ing &uperficial ,elocity

    /"en minimum fluidization condition i& reac"ed.

    c. It could e al&o &een t"at t"e ,elocitie& 7ot" terminal ,elocity and minimum fluidization

    ,elocity8 increa&e& linearly /it" t"e particle &ize.

    d. !"e experiment fluidization ,elocity i& to a certain extent clo&e to t"e calculated

    fluidization ,elocity.

    27

  • 8/10/2019 F2fluidisation

    28/28

    Experiment F2 Fluidization

    %. RE&ERENCES

    1. Jing Fa"d 9ni,er&ity of Petroleum Mineral&. +"emical Engineering ?epartment.

    +"apter #L Flo/ t"roug" packed fixed and fluidized ed&.

    "ttpL==faculty.kfupm.edu.&a=+