e gouvernance défis enjeux et expériences de la ci

Upload: perico1962

Post on 04-Jun-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    1/40

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    2/40

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    3/40

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    4/40

    European Central Bank, 2012

    AddressKaiserstrasse 2960311 Frankfurt am MainGermany

    Postal addressPostfach 16 03 1960066 Frankfurt am MainGermany

    Telephone+49 69 1344 0

    Websitehttp://www ecb europa eu

    Fax+49 69 1344 6000

    All rights reserved. Reproduction for

    educational and non-commercial purposesis permitted provided that the source isacknowledged.

    ISSN 1830-7000 (online)

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    5/40

    ECBEuro Money Market Survey3September 2012

    CONTENTS

    1 COUNTRY BREAKDOWN OF

    PARTICIPATING BANKS IN 2012 5

    2 THE UNSECURED MARKET 6

    2.1 Turnover analysis 6

    2.2 Maturity analysis 7

    2.3 Market structure 8

    2.4 Qualitative assessment 9

    3 THE SECURED MARKET 10

    3.1 Turnover analysis 10

    3.2 Maturity analysis 11

    3.3 Market structure 12

    3.4 Bilateral repos 13

    3.5 Triparty repos 13

    3.6 Qualitative assessment 14

    4 THE OTC DERIVATIVES MARKETS 15

    4.1 Turnover analysis 15

    4.2 Maturity analysis 16

    4.3 Qualitative assessment 21

    5 THE SHORT-TERM SECURITIES MARKET 275.1 Turnover analysis in the secondary market 27

    5.2 Qualitative assessment 28

    6 CROSS-MARKET ANALYSIS 29

    6.1 Turnover analysis 29

    6.2 Maturity analysis 30

    6.3 Market structure 31

    6.4 Qualitative assessment 33

    Annexes

    Annex I Credit institutions participating in the 2012

    Euro Money Market Survey 34

    Annex II Coordination of the 2012 ECB Euro Money

    Market Survey 36

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    6/40

    ECBEuro Money Market Survey4 September 2012

    Note : The data represented herein refer to the second quarter of each respective year.

    Abbreviations used for country names

    BE Belgium LU Luxembourg

    BG Bulgaria HU Hungary

    CZ Czech Republic MT Malta

    DK Denmark NL Netherlands

    DE Germany AT Austria

    EE Estonia PL Poland

    IE Ireland PT Portugal

    GR Greece RO Romania

    ES Spain SI Slovenia

    FR France SK Slovakia

    IT Italy FI Finland

    CY Cyprus SE Sweden

    LV Latvia UK United Kingdom

    LT Lithuania CH Switzerland

    Abbreviations used in the charts

    CCP central counterparty

    FRAs forward rate agreements

    FX swaps foreign exchange swaps

    IRSs other interest rate swaps

    OISs overnight index swaps

    O/N overnight

    OTC over the counter

    T/N tomorrow/next (day)

    S/N spot/next (day)

    ST securities short-term securities

    Xccys cross-currency swaps

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    7/40

    IN 2012

    1COUNTRY BREAKDOWN OF PARTICIPATING BANKS

    5ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    1.1 NUMBER OF PARTICIPATING BANKS PER COUNTRY

    Number of banks

    BELGIUM 3

    BULGARIA 4

    CZECH REPUBLIC 8

    DENMARK 1

    GERMANY 17

    ESTONIA 3

    IRELAND 6 GREECE 7

    SPAIN 13

    FRANCE 9

    ITALY 8

    CYPRUS 3

    LATVIA 4

    LITHUANIA 3

    LUXEMBOURG 3

    HUNGARY 3

    MALTA 5

    NETHERLANDS 6

    AUSTRIA 8

    POLAND 12

    PORTUGAL 14

    ROMANIA 3

    SLOVENIA 3

    SLOVAKIA 2

    FINLAND 2

    SWEDEN 3

    UNITED KINGDOM 16

    SWITZERLAND 3

    TOTAL 172

    Note: A detailed list of participating banks can be found in Annex I. Countries are listed in Protocol order, i.e. the alphabetical order of the country names in the respective nationallanguage.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    8/40

    2THE UNSECURED MARKET

    2.1 TURNOVER ANALYSIS

    6ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 1 Average daily turnover in unsecured cash lending and borrowing

    (index: cash lending volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    lendingborrowing

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    9/40

    2.2 MATURITY ANALYSIS

    7ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 2 Maturity breakdown for average daily turnover

    in unsecured lending (index: cash lending volume in 2002 = 100)

    Chart 3 Maturity breakdown for average daily turnover

    in unsecured borrowing (index: cash borrowing volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    O/NT/N to 1 month1 month to 3 months

    3 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    O/NT/N to 1 month1 month to 3 months

    3 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 4 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily

    turnover in unsecured lending (percentages of total)

    Chart 5 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily

    turnover in unsecured borrowing (percentages of total)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    20112012

    O/N T/N S/N lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13

    months36

    months6 months

    to1 year

    morethan

    1 year

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    20112012

    O/N T/N S/N lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13

    months36

    months6 months

    to1 year

    morethan

    1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    10/40

    2.3 MARKET STRUCTURE

    8ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 6 Geographical counterparty breakdown for unsecured

    average daily turnover in 2011 (percentages of total)

    Chart 7 Geographical counterparty breakdown for unsecured

    average daily turnover in 2012 (percentages of total)

    national (30.9%)

    euro area (45.2%)

    other (23.9%)

    national (43.1%)

    euro area (33.1%)

    other (23.9%)

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    11/40

    2.4 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT

    9ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 8 Is the unsecured segment in y our opinion efficient?

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 9 Has the market liquidity in the unsecured market

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 10 Counterparty structure of unsecured transactions

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 11 Trading structure of unsecured transactions

    (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    12/40

    3THE SECURED MARKET

    3 .I TURNOVER ANALYSIS

    10ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 12 Average daily turnover in secured cash lending and borrowing

    (index: cash lending volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    lendingborrowing

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    13/40

    3.2 MATURITY ANALYSIS

    11ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 13 Maturity breakdown for average daily turnover

    in secured lending and borrowing (percentages of total)

    Chart 14 Maturity breakdown for average daily turnover

    in secured lending and borrowing (percentages of total)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    O/NT/N to 1 month

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    1 month to 3 months3 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 15 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily

    turnover in secured lending (percentages of total)

    Chart 16 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily

    turnover in secured borrowing (percentages of total)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    20112012

    O/N T/N S/N lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13

    months36

    months6 months

    to1 year

    morethan

    1 year

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    20112012

    O/N T/N S/N lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13

    months36

    months6 months

    to1 year

    morethan

    1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    14/40

    3.3 MARKET STRUCTURE

    12ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 17 Geographical collateral breakdown

    for bilateral repos in 2011 (percentages of total)

    Chart 18 Geographical collateral breakdown

    for bilateral repos in 2012 (percentages of total)

    national (30.8%)

    euro area (65.3%)

    other (3.9%)

    national (30.0%)

    euro area (64.3%)

    other (5.7%)

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

    Chart 19 Total repo market breakdown

    (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    bilateral bilateral repos, non-CCP transactions only (reporting started in 2009)bilateral repos, CCP transactions only (reporting started in 2009)triparty repos

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    15/40

    3 .4 BILATERAL REPOS

    13ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 20 Maturity breakdown for average daily turnover in the bilateral repo market

    (percentages of total)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    2011 non-CCP 2011 CCP2012 non-CCP 2012 CCP

    O/N T/N S/N lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13months

    morethan

    3 months

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

    3 .5 TRIPARTY REPOS

    Chart 21 Maturity breakdown for average daily turnover in the triparty repo market

    (percentages of total)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    3035

    40

    45

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    3035

    40

    45

    20112012

    O/N T/N S/N lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13months

    morethan

    3 months

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    16/40

    3.6 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT

    14ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 22 Is the secured segment in your opinion efficient?

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 23 Has the market liquidity in the secured market

    changed with respect to last year?(percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficient significantly efficient extremely efficient

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 24 Counterparty structure of secured transactions

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 25 Trading structure of secured transactions

    (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    17/40

    4THE DERIVATIVES MARKETS4.I THE OTC DERIVATIVES MARKET: TURNOVER ANALYSIS

    15ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 26 Average daily turnover in the various OTC derivatives markets

    (index: OTC derivatives volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    OISsFX swaps

    other IRSsXccy swaps

    FRAs

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    18/40

    4.2 THE OTC DERIVATIVES MARKET: MATURITY ANALYSIS

    16ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 27 Average daily turnover in the OIS segment

    (index: OIS volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    up to 1 month1 month to 3 months

    3 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 28 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily turnover in the OIS segment

    (percentages of total)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    20112012

    lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13

    months36

    months6 months

    to1 year

    morethan

    1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    19/40

    17ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 29 Average daily turnover in the other IRS segment

    (index: other IRS volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    up to 2 years2 years to 5 years

    5 years to 10 yearsmore than 10 years

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 30 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily turnover in the other IRS segment

    (percentages of total)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    20112012

    up to1 year

    12years

    25years

    510years

    more than10 years

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    20/40

    18ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 31 Average daily turnover in the FRA segment

    (index: FRA volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    up to 1 week 1 week to 1 month

    1 month to 3 months3 months to 6 months

    6 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 32 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily turnover in the FRA segment

    (percentages of total)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    20112012

    lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13months

    36months

    6 monthsto

    1 year

    morethan

    1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    21/40

    19ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 33 Average daily turnover in the FX swap segment

    (index: FX swap volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    up to 1 month1 month to 3 months

    3 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 34 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily turnover in the FX swap segment

    (percentages of total)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    20112012

    O/N lessthan

    1 week

    1 week to

    1 month

    13months

    36months

    6 monthsto

    1 year

    morethan

    1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    22/40

    20ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 35 Average daily turnover in the Xccy swap segment

    (index: Xccy swap volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    up to 2 years2 years to 5 years

    5 years to 10 yearsmore than 10 years

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 36 Maturity-weighted breakdown for average daily turnover in the Xccy swap segment

    (percentages of total)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    20112012

    up to1 year

    12years

    25years

    510years

    more than10 years

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    23/40

    4.3 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT

    21ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 37 Is the OIS segment in your opinion efficient?

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 38 Has the market liquidity in the OIS market

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 39 Counterparty structure of OIS transactions

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 40 Trading structure of OIS transactions

    (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    24/40

    22ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 41 Is the other IRS segment in your opinion efficient?

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 42 Has the market liquidity in the other IRS market

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 43 Counterparty structure of other IRS transactions

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 44 Trading structure of other IRS transactions

    (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    25/40

    23ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 45 Is the FRA segment in your opinion efficient?

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 46 Has the market liquidity in the FRA market

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    n.a.0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    n.a.

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 47 Counterparty structure of FRA transactions

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 48 Trading structure of FRA transactions

    (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    n.a.0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    n.a.

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    26/40

    24ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 49 Is the FX swap segment in your opinion efficient?

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 50 Has the market liquidity in the FX swap market

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 51 Counterparty structure of FX swap transactions

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 52 Trading structure of FX swap transactions

    (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    27/40

    25ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 53 Is the Xccy swap segment in your opinionefficient?(percentages of total)

    Chart 54 Has the market liquidity in the Xccy swap market

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 55 Counterparty structure of Xccy swap transactions

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 56 Trading structure of Xccy swap transactions

    (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    28/40

    26ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 57 Is the options segment in your opinion efficient?

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 58 Has the market liquidity in the options market

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 59 Is the futures segment in y our opinion efficient?

    (percentages of total)

    Chart 60 Has the market liquidity in the futures market

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    29/40

    5THE SHORT-TERM SECURITIES MARKET5.I TURNOVER ANALYSIS IN THE SECONDARY MARKET

    27ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 61 Average daily turnover in outright transactions

    (index: outright transaction volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    government issuescredit institution issues

    non-credit institution issues

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    30/40

    5.2 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT

    28ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 62 Is the short-term securities segment in youropinion efficient? (percentages of total)

    Chart 63 Has the market liquidity for short-term securities

    changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    limitedly and not efficient

    not efficient* limitedly efficient*

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    has worsened

    significantly* slightly*

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    * Reporting started in 2012.Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 64 Counterparty structure of short-termsecurities transactions (percentages of total)

    Chart 65 Trading structure of short-term securities

    transactions (percentages of total)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    31/40

    6CROSS-MARKET ANALYSIS6 .I TURNOVER ANALYSIS

    29ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 66 Aggregated average daily turnover of the euro money market

    (index: aggregated average daily turnover volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    unsecuredsecured

    OISsFX swaps

    other IRSsXccy swaps

    FRAsST securities

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

    Chart 67 Average daily turnover in various money

    market segments (index: unsecured transaction volume in 2002 = 100)

    Chart 68 Average daily turnover in various money

    market segments (index: unsecured transaction volume in 2002 = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    unsecuredsecured

    OISsFX swaps

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    FRAsother IRSs

    Xccy swapsST securities

    Note: The panel comprised 105 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    32/40

    6.2 MATURITY ANALYSIS

    30ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 69 Maturity breakdown for various money market segments in 2012

    (index: unsecured volume = 100)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300350

    400

    unsecured secured OISs FX swaps FRAs0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300350

    400

    up to 1 week 1 week to 1 month

    1 month to 3 months3 months to 6 months

    6 months to 1 yearmore than 1 year

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    33/40

    6.3 MARKET STRUCTURE

    31ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Table 1 Concentration of unsecured market activity in 2012

    (percentages of total)

    Lending Borrowing

    Top 5 credit institutions 45.5 32.2 Top 10 credit institutions 64.6 49.1 Top 20 credit institutions 79.0 69.5

    Table 2 Concentration of secured market activity in 2012

    (percentages of total)

    Bilateral Bilateral Bilateral Bilateral Triparty Triparty Total Totalreverse repos repos reverse repos, repos, reverse repos repos reverse repos repos

    CCP only CCP only

    Top 5 credit institutions 43.5 36.3 49.5 46.8 85.7 57.6 41.5 34.5 Top 10 credit institutions 66.6 58.1 73.1 64.6 94.6 84.4 64.4 55.2 Top 20 credit institutions 88.2 79.0 92.8 85.2 99.8 97.3 87.1 79.4

    Table 3 Concentration of activity in the OTC derivatives markets and short-term securities in 2012

    (percentages of total)

    ST securities OISs Other IRSs FRAs FX swaps Xccy swaps

    Top 5 credit institutions 62.3 48.2 67.8 53.3 41.5 61.4 Top 10 credit institutions 77.2 75.5 84.1 76.1 63.2 81.0 Top 20 credit institutions 90.8 93.5 94.2 93.9 82.6 95.9

    Note: For Tables 1, 2 and 3 the panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    34/40

    32ECBEuro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 70 Lorenz curve: concentration of activity in various market segments in 2012

    (x axis: percentage of market participants; y axis: percentage of activity)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    unsecuredOISs

    FRAsXccy swaps

    securedFX swaps

    other IRSsST securities

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    35/40

    6.4 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT

    33ECB

    Euro Money Market SurveySeptember 2012

    Chart 71 Is the euro market (for the different segments) inyour opinion efficient? (percentages of total)

    Chart 72 Has the market liquidity in the euro money

    market changed with respect to last year? (percentages of total)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    7080

    90

    100

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    7080

    90

    100

    not efficientlimitedly efficient

    sufficiently efficientsignificantly efficientextremely efficient

    unsecured

    repos

    FX swaps

    FRAs

    OISs

    other IRSs

    Xccy swaps

    ST-securities

    options

    futures

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    7080

    90

    100

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    7080

    90

    100

    has worsened significantlyhas worsened slightly

    has not changedhas improved slightlyhas improved significantly

    unsecured

    repos

    FX swaps

    FRAs

    OISs

    other IRSs

    Xccy swaps

    ST securities

    options

    futures

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

    Chart 73 Counterparty structure of various money marketsegments in 2012 (percentages of total)

    Chart 74 Trading structure of vari ous money market

    segments in 2012 (percentages of total)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    nationaleuro area

    other

    unsecured

    secured

    FX swaps

    FRAs

    OISs

    other IRSs

    Xccy swaps

    ST securities

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    direct tradingvoice broker

    electronic trading

    unsecured

    secured

    FX swaps

    FRAs

    OISs

    other IRSs

    Xccy swaps

    ST securities

    Note: The panel comprised 172 credit institutions.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    36/40

    ECB

    34Euro Money Market Survey

    Sep ember 2012

    ANNEX ICREDIT INSTITUTIONS PARTICIPATING IN THE 2012 EURO MONEY MARKETSURVEY

    BE Belfius Banque SABE Fortis BanqueBE KBC Bank NVBG BNP Paribas S.A.BG DSK BankBG Eurobank EFG BulgariaBG United Bulgarian BankCZ esk spoitelna, a. s.CZ eskoslovensk obchodn banka, a. s.CZ Citibank Europe plc

    CZ HSBC Bank plcCZ ING Bank N.V.CZ Komern banka, a. s.CZ The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V.CZ UniCredit Bank Czech Republic a. s.DK Danske Bank A/SDE Bayerische LandesbankDE BHF-BANK AGDE Commerzbank AGDE DekaBank Deutsche GirozentraleDE Deutsche Bank AGDE Deutsche Postbank AGDE DZ BANK AGDE Hamburger Sparkasse AGDE HSH Nordbank AGDE Landesbank Baden-WrttembergDE Landesbank Berlin AGDE Landesbank Hessen-Thringen GirozentraleDE Landwirtschaftliche RentenbankDE SEB AGDE UniCredit Bank AGDE WestLB AGDE WGZ BANK AGEE AS Eesti KrediidipankEE AS LHV PankEE Bigbank ASIE Allied Irish Banks plcIE Depfa Bank plcIE permanent tsb plcIE Rabobank Ireland plcIE The Governor and Company of the Bank

    of IrelandIE UniCredit Bank Ireland plcGR Alpha Bank S.A.GR BNP Paribas

    GR EFG Eurobank Ergasias S.A.

    GR Emporiki Bank of Greece S.A.GR HSBC Bank plcGR National Bank of Greece S.A.GR Piraeus Bank S.A.ES Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (BBVA)ES Banco CAM S.A.ES Banco Cooperativo Espaol S.A.ES Banco de Sabadell S.A.ES Banco Espaol de Crdito S.A.ES Banco Popular Espaol S.A.

    ES Banco Santander S.A.ES Bankia S.A.ES Bankinter S.A.ES Caixa Bank S.AES Catalunya Banc S.A.ES Confederacin Espaola de Cajas de AhorrosES ING Direct, N.V. S.EFR BNP ParibasFR BPCEFR Bred - Banque PopulaireFR Crdit Agricole CIBFR Crdit Agricole S.A.FR Crdit Industriel et Commercial-CICFR HSBC FranceFR NatixisFR Socit GnraleIT Banca IMI SpaIT Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpaIT Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Spa (BNL)IT BNP Paribas S.A.IT Dexia Crediop SpaIT Intesa Sanpaolo SpaIT UBI Banca (Unione di Banche Italiane Scpa)IT UniCredit SpaCY Bank of Cyprus Public Company LtdCY Cyprus Popular Bank Public Co LtdCY Hellenic Bank Public Company LtdLV Citadele bankaLV Rietumu BankaLV SEB bankaLV SwedbankLT AB SEB bankasLT AB kio bankasLT Swedbank, AB

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    37/40

    ECBEuro Money Market Survey 35September 2012

    LU Banque et Caisse d'Epargne del'Etat, Luxembourg

    LU KBL European Private Bankers S.A.LU UniCredit Luxembourg S.A.HU ING Bank N.V. Magyarorszgi FiktelepeHU K&H Bank Zrt.HU UniCredit Bank Hungary Zrt.MT Akbank TASMT Bank of Valletta plcMT FIMBank plcMT Garanti Bank MaltaMT HSBC Bank Malta plcNL ABN AMRO Bank N.V.NL Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten N.V.

    NL Coperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank)NL F. van Lanschot Bankiers N.V.NL ING Bank N.V.NL The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V.

    AT Allgemeine Sparkasse Obersterreich Bank AG

    AT Erste Group Bank AG AT Oberbank AG AT sterreichische Volksbanken-AG AT Raiffeisen Bank International AG AT Raiffeisenlandesbank Niedersterreich-Wien

    AG AT Raiffeisen-Landesbank Steiermark AG AT UniCredit Bank Austria AGPL Bank BPH S.A.PL Bank Handlowy w Warszawie S.A.PL Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A. (Bank Pekao

    S.A.)PL Bank Zachodni WBK S.A.PL Deutsche Bank Polska S.A.PL Getin Noble Bank S.A.PL ING Bank lski S.A.PL Invest-Bank S.A.

    PL Kredyt Bank S.A.PL Powszechna Kasa Oszczdnoci Bank PolskiS.A. (PKO BP)

    PL Raiffeisen Bank Polska S.A.PL Societe Generale S.A. Oddzia w PolscePT Banco BPI SAPT Banco Comercial Portugus SAPT Banco do Brasil AG Sucursal em Portugal

    PT Banco Esprito Santo SAPT Banco Finantia SAPT Banco Ita Europa SAPT Banco Santander Totta SAPT BANIF-Banco Internacional do Funchal SAPT Barclays Bank plcPT BPN - Banco Portugus de Negcios SAPT Caixa Central - Caixa Central de Crdito

    Agrcola Mtuo, CRLPT Caixa Econmica Montepio GeralPT Caixa Geral de Depsitos SAPT Deutsche Bank (Portugal) SARO Banca Comerciala Romana S.A.RO BRD - Groupe Societe Generale S.A.

    RO RBS Bank (Romania) S.A.SI Abanka Vipa D.D.SI Nova Ljubljanska Banka d.d., LjubljanaSI UniCredit Banka Slovenija d.d.SK eskoslovensk obchodn banka, a.s.SK Veobecn verov banka, a.s. (VUB)FI Nordea Bank Finland AbpFI Pohjola Pankki OyjSE Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ)

    (SEB)SE Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ)SE Swedbank AB (publ)

    UK Abbey National Treasury Services plcUK Banco do Brasil SAUK Banco Espirito Santo SAUK Barclays Bank plcUK BNP ParibasUK Citibank NAUK Crdit Agricole CIBUK Credit SuisseUK Deutsche Bank AGUK Goldman Sachs International BankUK HSBC Bank plcUK JP Morgan Chase BankUK Lloyds TSB Bank plcUK Merrill Lynch International Bank LimitedUK Standard Bank plcUK The Royal Bank of Scotland plcCH Credit SuisseCH UBS AGCH Zrcher Kantonalbank AG (ZKB)

    Note : Countries are listed in Protocol order, i.e. the alphabetical order of the country names in the respectivenational language.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    38/40

    ECBEuro Money Market Survey 36September 2012

    ANNEX IICOORDINATION OF THE 2012 ECB EURO MONEY MARKET SURVEY

    The 2012 ECB Euro Money Market Survey was conducted by a working group, comprising staffmembers from the ECB and the national central banks (NCBs), which reported to the ESCBs

    Market Operations Committee.

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    39/40

  • 8/13/2019 e gouvernance Dfis enjeux et expriences de la CI

    40/40