cirilo hernandez-pacheco, a200 280 956 (bia nov. 26, 2014)

8/10/2019 Cirilo Hernandez-Pacheco, A200 280 956 (BIA Nov. 26, 2014)

1/12

US Dpm Juc

Executive Oce r Immigraton Revew

Bar mmg lc th Ck

5 /07 Leebrg Pike, te 000Fl Ch Vg 00

HS/ICE Ofce of Chief Counsel EAZ

P Box 25158Phoenix, AZ 85002

ame: HERNANDEZPACHECO, CRLO A 200-280956

Date o this notice 1/26/2014

ncosed s a copy of he Board's decson nd order te above-rereced case.

nclosre

Pl MAkBh, Ch KH h E

Scerey,

D cDonna CarrChef erk

k

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Cirilo Hernandez-Pacheco, A200 280 956 (BIA Nov. 26, 2014)


2/12

S Dearme of JsieExecutive Oce r Igation Review

Fl Chch, Vgi 2030

File: A200 80 56 Eoy,

re: CIRLO ANDEZAHECO

REMOVAL ROCEEDINGS

AE

ON BEHALF OF RSPONDENT: ro se

APLIATION Reopenn

Decson of te Bod of I igaton Appeal

Date:NOV 6204

he respondent, a nate nd cien of Meico, ws ordered reoed absenta by

iration Jude on Deceber 3, 201. He led a otion to reopen on May 3, 2013 emiration ude deed the oton on June 8, 2013, d te respondent tely appeals. eDepent of Hoeld Secty (DHS) has not replied to the appe. We l sustain erespondents appeal.

We hae considered e totalit of e crcsnces presented ths case, d nd atxceptiona circustces r e respondents faure to appe hae been shoSections 240(b)()() nd (e)() of the ration d Natonalty Act, 8 .SC. 122a(b)()(C), (e)(); 8 .F.R. 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). Accordly, the respondents appealwil be sustaned, e in absenta order will be rescnded, the proceedins wll be reopened, dthe record wil e rended to alow he respondent other opponity to appear r his

henORDER The appeal s susained.

FRTHER OER: These proceedins e reopened, e n absentia order of reoa iscated, d the record is reanded to e iration Co r er proceedns.

FOR T BOD

e ne a eee M , , e er S, h ed he appe, eensspended o practice bere te Bod As s atoey is not petted to practice awere the Bord t s te, s order is bein sent directly to the resonden. lease aso seee aached copy of the order suspendin atoey Sa o practce.

2 e respondents preious counsel, Robeo Sal, rst ed a drect appea of the in asenaorder to e Bod hic e Bod dsissed r ck of urisdicton, by order dated Mch 03 Sa en led e otion to reopen on te last day d dd nt include an daito the respondent.

Cite as: Cirilo Hernandez-Pacheco, A200 280 956 (BIA Nov. 26, 2014)


3/12

:

;

;

4 ,

t

;

/v

.

:

,

'

:

l

: " :'. . , . i . , v :

s;

o

pi

f

e

t

J

u

1

. ; . :." r

;( cuti p:

fmigraton Revw , - . " 9rct. 1 dgonApe . : _:,., ' t

: '

1i ; - ' ;: '


4/12


5/12

Disn of 'Id of on Aps (

1


6/12

fl 1

,

">

ITED SAES DEPTMET F USTCEEXECUT :FFCE FOR MMIGTON REVEW

MMGTON CT170.5 E HNA RD

EOY, AZ 8513

' SZ RBERTO \O E COSS SUE 65UCSN 85

N HE TTER OFHERNEZ-PACHECO CRIO

FILE A 200096

E TO FORWRD NO DRESS RODED

DATE Jun 28 203

TACHE S A COPY F THE DECSN OF THE GON GE TIS DECISONS FIN ESS APE S FED W THE B F GN APPS

ITHIN 30 CEND AYS F THE DATE OF THE IING F TIS WRTTEN DECISINSEE TE ENCSED FRMS D INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPEY PRPNG APPEAYUR NICE F APP ATTACED DOCTS FE OR FE WAR RQUESTMUS BEIED TO BO OF GTION APPES

OFFCE OF THE CERKPO BO 30FAS CHURCH VA 2204

ATTACHED IS A CO OF THE DECSON OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE HE RESTOF UR FAURE TO APPE AT O SCHEDUED DEPORTATION OR REMOVA HERINGTHS DSN S FN ESS A MOON T RPEN S FIED N ACC QRDCEWTH SECTN 242B(c) (3 F THE IMMIGRIN NANTY AC a scSECTON 22B(c) (3) IN DEPORTATION PROCEEDINGS OR SECTIN 240c68 .sc SECTN 1229a(c) (6 IN REMOV PROCEEDINGS IF YOU FE A MOTIONT REP OUR MTION MUS BE FED WIT TS COUR

OTHER

CC

I

IGTION COURT1705 E A RDY AZ 85

IMMGTIN COURT

! -

FF


7/12

UNTED STATS DEPRTMENT OF JUSTCEEXECUVE OC FOR MMIGATON REEW

IMMIGRATION COUR1705 AST HANNA ROAD,SUITE 366

LOY,AZ853

IN THE MATTER OF:

HERNANDEZPACHECO, Ciilo

SONDNT

IN REMOVAL PROCEDINGS

L NO. A008056

DATE: June 8, 013

MOTIN: Respodets Moio to Reopen Remo Poceeds

ON BEHAF OF THE RESPONDNT:Robeo Slz, sqOne Es Cness, Se 165ucson, Aizon 8501

ON BEHALF O THE DEPTMENT:Elly , Assisnt Che CoselDepaen o Homel Securiy105 Es Hnn RoEoy, Arzon 85 131

MEMODUM DECISION AND ORDER OF TH MMIGRTION COURT

I PRCEDU BACKGROUND

e boenmed espondet is thiyu ye old mle tie n ctizen o MexicoOn Juy 5, 01, e Depmet o Homelnd Secity ("DHS o "he Depent) ssued Noice to Appe ("NTA) st the espoet (Exh 1, Form 86, ) s chrinocument lee h he esponen ws ie izen o Mexo who enee he UnieStates t o ne unknown pe on o bou n unkno te wihout be mite opoled e nspeion by immition ofe ()

Bsed on these letons, the DHS hed the espondent wth bein emoblepusut to secio 1()(6)(A)(i) o he mmiio d Ntolty Ac, "in tht he s] alie pest i e Uited Stes wiout bei dmitted o poled, o who ed he UnitedSttes t y time o plce othe th s dested by the Aoey Geel () In wrepleins, the espondent dmted l o the lletions and conede s emoblity ashare bse on these dmissions d coessios, the Co sustied the letos d thehe by ler a oninin eiene Ex (Au 13, 01), 913) Meco wsesinted s e outyoemol (T 90) The espondent erred tt he wshed topply cacelltio o emol cei nopermnent esidens d olutry depe, ithe teie, pursun tosecios 0A(b)(), 0B o he Act ( t 91318)

The Co oaly oied e espodet th he cse ws eset to Decembe , 0, t830 m, d the espondes cousel cowleded tht s he dte ws cceptble


8/12

ENANDEZ-PACHECO

A20280-56

' '

TH COT

COSELTHE CO

HE COUTCONSEL:

(Tr. at 02-23, 35-

My rst aaiae ree hour hearng is Decemer 3r at830, are ou aaiae, sir?Yes, Your HonorSo December 3rd, 202 e the date r te iniuahearing at 8:30 in the moing. .

Deceber 3 at 830, r SalrYes, our Honor

The s ay as the hearing, te Cour med a oce of Hearing o he responentscouse, stating that the responent as scedued to appe at ndiua heng ere thsCou on Decemer 3, 202. (Exh. 3.

e responen as reease on ond on Nomer 30, 202 (DHS Opposition (une 7,203, Ac. A Prior to his reease, he respondent cee tat he had een ifoed y heCour to appear r a her hearng an that a remoal hen coud e conducte n sasence if e fed to appear r at erng. (

On ecemer 3, 202, neither te responent, nor his counse appee ere this Cour.(Tr. (ec 3, 202, 56-7 o otion to che enue ad een receied by e Co as ofeeber 3, 202 h DHS requeste the respndent e ordered reoe n aena (I at8: - 4. In a rten orer, the Cour deteined that the responen was amenae to theeny of a n ena reova order ecause he ied o atend remoa proceeings in hismaer espite eng personaly see ith the NTA, ad in spite o th ct ha his aoeys sere t sufcient notice of the time and pace of the reoa heing, (I Orer (Dec 3, 202, 3-6. See sections 239(a(2, (c, 240((5 of e Act; 8 C.F 292.5 (203Accordngy, he responen s orere remoe to Mexico on December 3, 202. (I Order at

On Ma 3, 203, th respondent reuested tat this Cour reopen hs reoaroceeins. (espt Mot (May 3, 203 e DHS ed ts opposition to this request onJune 7, 203. DHS positio (Jue 203

1 Te Cou's records ndcate that a moton to chge venue was receved by the Cou onDecember 10, 202 and as rejeced de to the ct tat the respondent ad been ordered reoved aeek rior.

2 Pror o ng s moton to reopen te espondent appealed te Cou's in absentia reovaorder o the Bord of Imgraon Appeals On Mc 27 203 te Boar dsmssed te responent'sappea r ac of ursdcton an retued e recor n s maer o ts Cou ts Order te Bodsuggesed that te respondent le a oton o reoen bere ths Co pursuant to secton 240{b)(S)(C ofte Act

2


9/12

HNNZ-PACHCO .A0-8096

II STTMNT OF LW

mmgato udge upo s o e moto, o upo moto of te HS o a ale,may eope or ecose ay case c e o se as made a ecso, uless jurscto svested t e Board of mmgrato Appeas. 8 CR 00(b)() Geeally, an ae s

mte to oy oe moto to reope, c must be ed nety ays of e ate of eryof a na admsatve orer of emoval, depoato, or excluso, o o or bere September0, 996, cever s aer Secto 40(c)(7)(C)() of te Act 8 C.R. 00(b)()Ue cea crcumsnces, oeve, a moo to rescd an in absena emoval order eterepursua o seco 0)() of e Act may be le ouse te neay g peroSectos 40(b)(), (c)(7)(C)() of te Act 8 CR 00.(b)(4)()

Speccaly, a moto to escd a n absenta remova orde may be e n 80days ae te dae of te orde of emova f e ale demosaes tat te flue o appea asbecause of exceptoal ccumsances as eed by secto 40(e )( ) of e ct "xceoal ccumsces cude "ccumstces beyd te coo of e ae . suc as

baey or exteme cety, seous lless by te ae, o seous less o dea of te spouse,cd, o pet of e le, bu no ncudng less compellng crcumsances . ." (empassaded) Ateatvely, a moto to escd n .bsena emoval ode may be ed "a ytme f e o se emosates that e o se d ot eceve otce accodace t sectos9(a)() o () of te Act, o the ale demostates tat e o se as fedeal o statecustody ad te lre to appe as troug o ult of te ae Id

Ultmatey, te ecso to at or dey a moto to eope s an maoudge's "broa dscreto e te c ad te regulatos. NS v. Doher, 0 U.S 4, (9) (ctatos oted).

III FNDINGS ND ANLYSIS

Te espoet rgues at s emovl oceegs soud be reopeed because "t ascoec te Eloy mmgato uge to ave a []dvua eg abseta . (espt Mot. at Te espodet cocedes tat ths Cou appe he coec egal sdcosdee e appopate evdece and popey alocate e burde of proof e t odeem emoved n bsena ( He eey oecs to he ct tat a dvdual eg as elo a Moay (ecember , 0) e e as eleased om HS custoy o he day(November 0, 0). ( a ) y te oy mato uge a a dvual eg abseta a sato ere e respodet pa e bo moun a as eleased 48 oursapproxmaely bee e eg?) e espodets moto s unmely s gumet

acks me Accordgly, te respodets moto to eope sal be denedA Tiss

Te espodets moto s untmey e ecod eects tat te respodet as oeedremoved n asent o ecembe , 0 ( Ore at 6.) Te espoet le s moto toreope t s Cou o May , 079 days ae e ery of te Cous emova ode(Resp Mot at ) Te espodet's moto equests tat s Cou escd ts n absena orde


10/12

EANDEPACHECO

A08096

hs aer (Id der he regulaos, herere, he respode's lg of hs oosde he etd perod s excusae f he c deosrae () excepoal crcusaces;(2) lack of sufce ce; or (3) he as der or sae cusod ad hs fale o apper washrough o ul of hs o 8 CF. 003.3()()() Based o e evdece of record dhe elw aass, e C s ha e respde hs led o deosrae sufce

excuse uder he reguats

i. Excepional Cirumstances

The respode has fled o esalsh ha he as preveed o lg s oo oreope i he eda lg per excepol crcsaces as deed seco20(e of he c hs o, he respde es ha he mae a oo o chageveue o Deceer 3, 202he dae of hs reoval heg Hever, he mere lg, leae alg, of a o r chage of veue es o cstue excepo crcscesso as releve he respde f hs respst appear r hs scheduled reva hearg,ad uess e Igrao udge gras the oo, he reas oged appe a he

appoed place, dae, ad e See Maer of Rivera, 19 I&N Dec. 688 (BA 988); Maer ofPae 19 &N Dec 60 (BIA 198), ad Pae v NS, 803 F.2d 80 ( Cr 1986); cHernanezVvas v S 3 F.3d 160 (9 Cr 1994) (holdg nder ower resoale casesdard ha lg a oo r a chage of veue dd o excuse ure o appe)

The C kes ce, here, ha e respode was released o Tcso Arzoeee oe ad t hrs awa s Cou aooe See aer of R-R- 20 &NDec 4 .3 (BI 992) (holdg ha s ell esalhed ha a Judges ae adstrve oce of coo kn r rea veale cs). Nohg herespodes o dcaes ha he was ale appear ere hs Cu o Deceer 3,02, de o aer; exee cruelty; a serus lles; or he serous lless r deah f a

edae relave Seco 0(e)() of he Ac; 8 CF.. 0033()(4)() herere, heCou ds ha he respode hs o deosed ha excepol crcusces excuse elae lg of hs oo o reope.

ii Ntice

The recrd as reecs ha the respde ad hs cousel receved suce ce ofhe Deceer 3, 202 heg uder secos 239(a)() or (2) f Ac. Uder hese provss s suce o see e NA r a Noce f Hearg he ae n perso. Secos 239(a)(),(2) of he Ac Noce of a reova heg s as suce uder hese provsos f reoce ofe heg s servced a o he aes cosel of record Seco 39(a)()(A)

of e AcHere, he recrd reecs a he respde cledged a as persall served

e NT s aer. ( a 2) e recr addoal dcaes hs Couoe te respe he respdes cusel ral ha a reova hearg as scheduledDeceer 3, 202, a 83 a, and the respde's cusel acledged h s hegdae as ccepae

3 o dd not cv s moton ntl cmb 202


11/12

HEDEPACHEA22896

THE COR

CONSETHE COR

THE CORTOSEL

My rs aaae ee hour heng s Dcemer 3rd at 83, eyou aaae, sYes, Your Honor.So Deceme 3d, 22 w e the date r the ndua heng

at 83 n he mornng Decemer 3 at 83, M SaazYes, Your Hono.

(r (Aug 3, 22), 2-23, 35-6)

he recor so reects that, on August 3, 22, the ort maed a Noce of Hearng toe respondens counse of recor, stng hat the respondent was scheded to appe at anndu heng ere ths Cou on Decemer 3, 22 (Exh 3 see s orm EO-28)Therere, he responen ecee adeue oce of e Decemer 3, 22, heng early fur

mhs n adce Sectons 239(a)() or (2) of Act 8 CR 323()(4)()pon s reease on Noemer 3, 22, the esponent acoedged e consequences

of lng to appe r any heng schedued n s poceedngs (HS Opposton a tachA More precsely, he acknoweged that f he led to appe hs remoa "hearng coud ehed n [hs] asence, hch s pecsey hat happened d) The espondent s thus ncapaleof demonsang that he acked notce of the Decemer 3, 22, herng

Fdra r Stat Cstdy

The recor eects a e responet was reease om HS cstoy on oemer 3,

22 (DHS Opposon at Attach A) Thee s no ndcaton whatsoeer a e respondenwas preente om appearng at hs Decemer 3, 22, heang ecause he was n dera orstae cusody

v Ccs

On ths record, the responent has ed to estash that he take adtage of the lngexcepton nder 8 CFR 323b)(4)() Conseqenty, hs moton s tmey

B Dscrt

The respondents gent wthout mert rtheore, the Cour condes ha erespondents moton does not warr a orae exercse of screon he resonentandhs coeere en scent notce of the ecemer 3, 2, heang Supra at 4-5 Nocozae excuse has been presented e are o appe The respondent merey proteststhat s remoal proceedng as hed too soon aer hs eleae on on s noted, hoeer, heDecemer 3, 22, hearng date a set approxmately fur m n adce I ct, theresponent and hs counse were gen wte d ora notce of hs heng date on Agust 3,22 (Exh 3; Tr (Ag 3, 22), 2-3, 35-6.)


12/12

ZPACCA280956

he responden's posiion misconses hs oigions in hese proceengs His reeasem H csody does no nege his responsiiy o pper r heng whch he hasreceied eqae noice Maing a moion o change ene o his Co he dy o his hengso dos no e h o hs sponsiiy o appear

No oer rpresnions ere md y eer he esponden o his represen por o(or on) Decemer 202 a pocedngs sod e deaed This Cor perms inong hch aos o pes o moonsincdng moions o cge ni heCor persony d decy. Therere h sponden's sseion ha " was impse ole he cang o ene pror o he ecmr 2012 heing is seess (sp' Mo )egrdess he responen wod he een reqire o pp e Decemer 202harng een if he hd propery ed moon o chge ene pror o h e

rsdicion n e responden's case esed w his Co on 5 202 h 1 1.)8 CF 1001(a) The Co was no diesed of risdicion pon he responen's reeaseon ond Accodng his Cor e hn s hoy o condc a hearing in his

csea maer or hch ined rsdcion he Co ws so n is ahoriwen scheded e Dcm 2012 hng n s mr on Ags 1 2012approximae mons in adcand prodd boh pis h adeqae noice of eDecemer 2012 eng 8 CF 100 18 Nong copes hs Co o esch eng ssn o an en's ese on ond As a conseqence he Co decines oeercise s dscrion wi rspec o he responden's oon on ccon o s er ck ofmeri

. CONCLUSION

Accodng he Cor sha ene e ong rde

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT he sponden's moon o open isDENIED

PPEAL RGHTS Boh pes hae e rgh o ppe he ecsion of he Immigrion dge

in his case An ppa is d n he ands of h Bod of Immgion Appeas on or erehiry cendar ds om he de o srice o hs decison

CTIFICA F VICTHI DCMEN W VD BY: MAIL (M) P R NAL SVIC (P)TO ( ) AL ( ) ALIN c/o Csodi cr ALN' P ) DHDA l BY COT TAFF

Achmns ( ) I ( ) OI28 ( ) Leg rces Ls ( Oher

6

cirilo hernandez-pacheco, a200 280 956 (bia nov. 26, 2014)

Documents