Centre TIMEGrenoble Ecole de Management

March 17th 2010 - Brussels

Renforcement des CApacités des PArtenaires sociaux dans les bonnes pratiques pour une meilleure intelligence économique TERritoriale

CAPATER ProjectCAPATER ProjectPromote territorial intelligence to better manage Promote territorial intelligence to better manage change impact on skills and jobs – The case of the change impact on skills and jobs – The case of the

Regional Pole for MobilityRegional Pole for Mobility

Rationale of the Regional Pole for MobilityRationale of the Regional Pole for Mobility

Large companies as well as SME are confronted with rapid evolutions of competences and employment associated with the economical and technological evolutions. This results in jobs suppressions and in the emergence of new jobs.

Workers are frequently promoters of professional projects, either internal to their company or external, more or less mature, without possibility to be helped for their realization.

A large majority of workers are willing to stay in their region for working.

CAPATER ProjectCAPATER Project

ActorsActors

STMicroelectronics, H.P., Capgemini, Radiall in the Grenoble area since 2007.

Unions representatives as long as they have signed the « GPEC » (management of the anticpation of jobs and competences) agreements.

Public services for employment and training are associated to the foollow-up of the experimentation.

Recent implementation in PACA region.

CAPATER ProjectCAPATER Project

Objectives of the Regional Pole of MobilityObjectives of the Regional Pole of Mobility

The Regional Pole of Mobility aims to help workers to secure dynamically their own professional project.

It favors the fertilisation and fluidity of the professional mobility of

workers on the territory. It helps companies to permanently update their competences.

It also reinforces the link between large companies and SMEs. It also support the synergy with the local « pôle de compétitivité ».

CAPATER ProjectCAPATER Project

The Regional Pole of Mobility caseThe Regional Pole of Mobility case

Si échec

Elaboration et Validation du projet

professionnel

Population éligible

Expression du volontariat

Mobilitéinterne

Mobilitéexterne

aboutissementabandon

Entreprises du Pôle

de MobilitéRégional

Elaboration du projet individuel

Développement du projet individuel

ACCOMPAGNEMENT Comitéinterne

Comite d’agrément

Validation des projets en mobilitéexterne

Pas de conséquence sur l’activitéprofessionnelle,

poursuite du parcours professionnel

Réintégration ou autre solution

prévue dans l’accord GPEC

The Regional pole of Mobility caseThe Regional pole of Mobility case

Les consultants référents, la boite à outils individualisée

Point inf o-conseil / Entretien Diagnostic

Rencontre individuelle avec référent

Salarié : acteur de son avenir professionnel

Des outils pour élaborer son projet ,

•Ateliers de carrière, atelier de création d’entreprise.

•Bilans de compétences, techniques de recherche d’emploi,

•Aide à l’élaboration de dossier VAE

Prospection postes, métiers internes et externes

Perspectives emploi Veille permanente des évolutions et postes à pourvoir sur le bassin

Veille des besoins de compétences des entreprises adhérentes

Créations d’emplois, naissance et transmissions d’entreprises

1 - Entretien individuel et bilan

avec référent

2 - Suivi individuel

par réf érent

Role of the Unions representativesRole of the Unions representatives

The Board of Directors remains in the hands of the management of the companies members of the pole.

Nevertheless the participation of the unions repesentative is important: Inside the companies, through the signature of the « GPEC » agreements and the

existence of the internal workers projects validation committee to which both the management and the representatives of the unions participate.

At the pole level through the project agreement committee which gathers: • Unions representatives• Public services publics for employment and training ….• Managers from the companies.

A joint committee for the periodic follow-up of the experimentation at the level of the interprofessional local unions organisation in order to:

• Follow the activity of the pole• Garantee the principles of the GPEC, particularly at SME level when no GPEC agreement

has been signed• Follow the financial issues (fundings from the State ot he Region…)

CAPATER ProjectCAPATER Project

Results Results (October 2010)(October 2010)

833 workers met, 386 projects (47%) have been presented to the validation committee 323 projects have been validated:

• Business creation: 141 projects

• Move to another company: 87 projects

• External reconversion: 67 projects

• Internal reconversion: 21 projects

• Other : 7 projects

CAPATER ProjectCAPATER Project

Thank youwww.capater.com