prolog - part 2
Post on 23-Jan-2016
58 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Agile Software Development LabDr. Günter Kniesel, Daniel Speicher, Tobias Rho
Spring 2008
Prolog - Part 2
Patrick Rypalla
Alexis Raptarchis
rypalla@cs.uni-bonn.de
raptarch@cs.uni-bonn.de
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 2
Lists
A list is a finite sequence of elements.
Example of a list in Prolog:
[mia, vincent, jules, yolanda]
[]
[[ ], dead(z), [2, [b,c]], [ ], Z, [2, [b,c]]]
List elements are enclosed in square brackets Elements are eparated by comas There is a special list: The empty list [] All sorts of Prolog terms can be elements of a list
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 3
Lists: Head and Tail
A non-empty list consists of two parts:
The head: The head is the first element of the list.
The tail: The tail is what remains once we have removed the head. The tail of a list is always a list.
What about the empty list?
The empty list has neither a head nor a tail Plays an important role in recursive predicates for list
processing.
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 4
Lists: Head and Tail
Some examples: [mia, vincent, jules, yolanda]
Head: mia
Tail: [vincent, jules , yolanda]
[[ ], dead(z), [2, [b,c]], [ ], Z, [2, [b,c]]]
Head: []
Tail: [dead(z), [2, [b,c]], [ ], Z, [2, [b,c]]]
[dead(x)]
Head: dead(x)
Tail: []
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 5
Lists: The Operator |
The built-in Prolog operator | is used to decompose a list into its head and tail:
?- [X|Y] = [mia, vincent, jules, yolanda].
X = mia
Y = [vincent,jules,yolanda]
yes
?-
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 6
Lists: The Operator |
The built-in Prolog operator | is used to decompose a list into its head and tail:
?- [X|Y] = [ ].
no
?-
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 7
Lists: The Operator |
We can also use | to split a list at any point:
?- [X,Y|Tail] = [[ ], dead(z), [2, [b,c]], [], Z, [2, [b,c]]] .
X = [ ]
Y = dead(z)
Z = _4543
Tail = [[2, [b,c]], [ ], Z, [2, [b,c]]]
yes
?-
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 8
Lists: The Operator |
Suppose we are interested in the second and fourth element of a list:
X1,X3 and Tail aren’t of any interest for us.
?- [X1,X2,X3,X4|Tail] = [mia, vincent, marsellus, jody, yolanda].
X1 = mia
X2 = vincent
X3 = marsellus
X4 = jody
Tail = [yolanda]
yes
?-
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 9
Lists: The Anonymous Variable _
The anonymous variable is used when you need to use a variable, but you are not interested in what Prolog instantiates it to.
Each occurrence of the anonymous variable is independent, i.e. can be bound to something different.
?- [ _,X2, _,X4|_ ] = [mia, vincent, marsellus, jody, yolanda].
X2 = vincent
X4 = jody
yes
?-
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 10
Lists: member/2
One of the most basic things we would like to know is whether a term X is an element of list L.
So we need a predicate that when given a term X and a list L, tells us whether or not X belongs to L:
This predicate recursively works its way down a list doing something to the head, and then recursively doing the same thing to the tail.
Very important Prolog technique
member(X,[X|T]).
member(X,[H|T]):- member(X,T).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 11
Lists: member/2
In order to force attention to what is essential we could replace the unnecessary variables with anonymous variables:
member(X,[X|T]).
member(X,[H|T]):- member(X,T).
member(X,[X|_]).
member(X,[_|T]):- member(X,T).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 12
Lists: member/2
A test run of member:
member(X,[X|_]).
member(X,[_|T]):- member(X,T).
?- member(vincent,[yolanda,trudy,vincent,jules]).
yes
?- member(X,[yolanda,trudy,vincent,jules]).
X = yolanda;
X = trudy;
X = vincent;
X = jules;
no
?-
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 13
Lists: Excercise
Write a predicate a2b/2 that takes two lists as arguments and succeeds
if the first argument is a list of as and the second argument is a list of bs and the two lists are of equal length.
Hint: Ask yourself “Are two empty lists equal?”. This is the base case.
?- a2b([a,a,a,a],[b,b,b,b]).
yes
?- a2b([a,a,a,a],[b,b,b]).
no
?- a2b([a,c,a,a],[b,b,b,t]).
no
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 14
Lists: Excercise
Solution:
Often a good strategy is to
think about the simplest possible case
Now think recursively! When should a2b/2 decide that two non-empty lists are a list of as and a list of bs of exactly the same length?
a2b([],[]).
a2b([a|L1],[b|L2]):- a2b(L1,L2).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 15
Arithmetic in Prolog
Prolog offers a number of basic arithmetic tools:
2 + 3 = 5
3 x 4 = 12
5 – 3 = 2
3 – 5 = -2
4 2 = 2
1 is the remainder when 7 is divided by 2
?- 5 is 2+3.
?- 12 is 34.
?- 2 is 5-3.
?- -2 is 3-5.
?- 2 is 4/2.
?- 1 is mod(7,2).
Arithmetic Prolog
?- 10 is 5+5.
yes
?- 4 is 2+3.
no
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 16
Arithmetic in Prolog
It is important to know that +, -, / and do not , on their own, carry out any arithmetic.
Expressions such as 3+2, 4-7, 5/5 are ordinary Prolog terms just used in user friendly notation. Functor: +, -, /, Arity: 2 Arguments: integers
This leads to:?- X = 3 + 2.
X = 3+2
yes
?- 3 + 2 = X.
X = 3+2
yes
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 17
Arithmetic in Prolog: The is/2 predicate
To force Prolog to actually evaluate arithmetic expressions, we have to use the is predicate.
This is not an ordinary predicate there are some restrictions:
?- X is 3 + 2.
X = 5
yes
?- 3 + 2 is X.
ERROR: is/2: Arguments are not sufficiently instantiated
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 18
Arithmetic in Prolog: Restrictions of the is/2 predicate
1. We are free to use variables on the right hand side of the is predicate.
2. But when Prolog actually carries out the evaluation, the variables must be instantiated with a variable-free Prolog term.
3. This Prolog term must be an arithmetic expression.
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 19
Arithmetic in Prolog: Arithmetic and Lists
How long is a list?
The empty list has a length of zero. A non-empty list has a length of one plus the length of it’s tail.
len([],0).len([_|L],N):- len(L,X), N is X + 1.
?- len([a,b,c,d,e,[a,x],t],X).
X=7
yes
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 20
Accumulator
There is another way of finding out the length of a list using an accumulator:
Accumulators are variables that hold intermediate results.
The predicate acclen/3 has three arguments
1. The list whose length we want to find
2. The length of the list, an integer
3. An accumulator, keeping track of the intermediate values for the length
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 21
Accumulator
The accumulator of acclen/3: Initial value of the accumulator is 0 Add 1 to accumulator each time we can recursively take the head
of a list When we reach the empty list, the accumulator contains the length
of the list
acclen([],Acc,Acc).
acclen([_|L],OldAcc,Length):-
NewAcc is OldAcc + 1,
acclen(L,NewAcc,Length).
?-acclen([a,b,c],0,Len).
Len=3
yes
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 22
Tail-Recursive
Which predicate is better?
acclen/3 because it is tail-recursive.
Difference between tail recursive and recursive:
In tail recursive predicates the results is fully calculated once we reach the base clause.
In recursive predicates that are not tail recursive, there are still goals on the stack when we reach the base clause.
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 23
Non Tail-Recursive len/2
Search tree for len/2:?- len([a,b,c], Len).
/ \
no ?- len([b,c],Len1), Len is Len1 + 1.
/ \
no ?- len([c], Len2), Len1 is Len2+1, Len is Len1+1. / \
no ?- len([], Len3), Len2 is Len3+1, Len1 is Len2+1,
Len is Len1 + 1. / \
Len3=0, Len2=1, no
Len1=2, Len=3
len([],0).len([_|L],NewLength):- len(L,Length), NewLength is Length + 1.
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 24
Tail-Recursive acclen/3
Search tree for acclen/2:
?- acclen([a,b,c],0,Len).
/ \
no ?- acclen([b,c],1,Len).
/ \
no ?- acclen([c],2,Len).
/ \
no ?- acclen([],3,Len).
/ \
Len=3 no
acclen([ ],Acc,Acc).
acclen([_|L],OldAcc,Length):-
NewAcc is OldAcc + 1,
acclen(L,NewAcc,Length).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 25
Arithmetic in Prolog: Comparing Integers
Operators that compare integers actually do carry out arithmetic by themselves:
These have the obvious meaning. Force both left and right hand argument to be evaluated.
x < y
x y
x = y
x y
x y
x > y
X < Y
X =< Y
X =:= Y
X =\= Y
X >= Y
X > Y
Arithmetic Prolog
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 26
Arithmetic in Prolog: Comparing Integers
Some examples:
?- 2 < 4+1.
yes
?- 4+3 > 5+5.
no
?- 4 = 4.
yes
?- 2+2 = 4.
no
?- 2+2 =:= 4.
yes
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 27
Arithmetic in Prolog: Exercise
Define a predicate accMax/3 that takes three arguments, and is true when: The first argument is a list of positive integers and The third argument is the highest integer in the list.
The second argument is the initialization of the accumulator
Hint: Use the accumulator to keep track of the highest value encountered so far.
?- accMax([1,0,5,4],0,Max).
Max=5
yes
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 28
Arithmetic In Prolog: Excercise
Solution:
accMax([H|T],A,Max):-
H > A,
accMax(T,H,Max).
accMax([H|T],A,Max):-
H =< A,
accMax(T,A,Max).
accMax([],A,A).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 29
Other useful predicates for lists: append/3
append(L1,L2,L3)
Base clause: appending the empty list to any list produces that same list
The recursive step says that when concatenating a non-empty list [H|T] with a list L, the result is a list with head H and the result of concatenating T and L
append([], L, L).
append([H|L1], L2, [H|L3]):-
append(L1, L2, L3).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 30
Other useful predicates for lists: append/3
We can also use append/3 to define other useful predicates like prefix/2:
A list P is a prefix of some list L when there is some list such that L is the result of concatenating P with that list.
How about suffix/2?
prefix(P,L):-
append(P,_,L).
suffix(S,L):-
append(_,S,L).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 31
Other useful predicates for lists: Naïve reverse
naiveReverse/2
If we reverse the empty list we get the empty list. If we reverse the list [H|T], we end up with the list obtained by
reversing T and concatenating with [H].
naiveReverse/2 does an awful lot of work. Isn’t there a better way?
naiveReverse([],[]).
naiveReverse([H|T],R):-
naiveReverse(T,RT),
append(RT,[H],R).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 32
Other useful predicates for lists: reverse
reverse/2: Use a list as an accumulator. Take the head of the list that we want to reverse and add it to
the head of the accumulator list. When we hit the empty list , the accumulator will contain the
reversed list!
accReverse([ ],L,L).
accReverse([H|T],Acc,Rev):-
accReverse(T,[H|Acc],Rev).
reverse(L1,L2):-
accReverse(L1,[ ],L2).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 33
Other useful predicates for lists: Exercise
Define a predicate sublist/2 that finds sub-lists of lists. Hint: Use already known predicates.
Solution: The sub-lists of a list L are simply the prefixes of suffixes of L
sublist(Sub,List):-
suffix(Suffix,List),
prefix(Sub,Suffix).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 34
The Cut
Backtracking is a characteristic feature of Prolog but can often lead to inefficiency
Prolog can waste time exploring possibilities that go nowhere.
The cut predicate !/0 offers a way to control backtracking.
Example:
Cut always succeeds. Cut commits Prolog to the choices that were made since the
parent goal was called.
p(X):- b(X), c(X), !, d(X), e(X).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 35
The Cut
In order to better explain the cut, we will
Look at a piece of cut-free Prolog code and see what it does in terms of backtracking
Add cuts to this Prolog code
Examine the same piece of code with added cuts and look how the cuts affect backtracking
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 36
The Cut: cut-free code
p(X):- a(X). p(X):- b(X), c(X), d(X),
e(X).p(X):- f(X). a(1).b(1). b(2).c(1). c(2).d(2).e(2).f(3).
?- p(X).
X=1;
X=2;
X=3;
no
?- p(X).
?- a(X). ?- f(X).
?- d(2), e(2).
?- e(2).
?- d(1), e(1).
?- c(1),d(1),e(1). ?- c(2),d(2),e(2).
?- b(X),c(X),d(X),e(X).
X=1 X=1X=2
†
X=3
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 37
The Cut: cut
?- p(X).
X=1;
?- p(X).
?- a(X). ?- b(X),c(X),!,d(X),e(X).
X=1
p(X):- a(X). p(X):-
b(X),c(X),!,d(X),e(X).p(X):- f(X). a(1).b(1). b(2).c(1). c(2).d(2).e(2).f(3). ?- c(1), !, d(1), e(1).
X=1
?- !, d(1), e(1).
?- d(1), e(1).
X
X
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 38
The Cut
Consider the predicate max/3 which succeeds if the third argument is the maximum of the first two.
Suppose it is called with ?- max(3,4,Y). It will correctly unify Y with 4 But when asked for more solutions, it will try to satisfy the
second clause. This is pointless!
Better:
max(X,Y,Y):- X =< Y.max(X,Y,X):- X>Y.
max(X,Y,Y):- X =< Y, !.
max(X,Y,X):- X>Y.
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 39
Green Cuts , Red Cuts
Cuts that do not change the meaning of a predicate are called green cuts.
The cut in max/3 is an example of a green cut:
the new code gives exactly the same answers as the old version,
but it is more efficient
Cuts that do change the meaning of a predicate are called red cuts.
max(X,Y,Y):- X =< Y, !.
max(X,Y,X):- X>Y.
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 40
The fail/0 predicate
fail/0 is a special predicate that will immediately fail when Prolog encounters it as a goal.
May not sound too useful but: When Prolog fails, it tries to backtrack!
The combination of cut and fail allows us to code exceptions for our rules.
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 41
Exceptions
An example:enjoys(vincent,X):-
bigKahunaBurger(X), !, fail. enjoys(vincent,X):- burger(X).
burger(X):- bigMac(X).burger(X):- bigKahunaBurger(X).burger(X):- whopper(X).
bigMac(a). bigKahunaBurger(b).bigMac(c).whopper(d).
?- enjoys(vincent,b).
no
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 42
Negation as failure
The cut-fail combination lets us define a form of negation called negation as failure.
For any Prolog goal, neg(Goal) will succeed precisely if Goal does not succeed.
cut blocks backtracking and then fail tries to force it.
In standard Prolog the prefix operator \+ means negation as failure
neg(Goal):- Goal, !, fail. neg(Goal).
enjoys(vincent,X):- burger(X), \+
bigKahunaBurger(X).
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 43
Negation As Failure: Excercise
What would happen if we changed the order of the goals in the burger example? That is if we had:
Solution:
Negation as failure is not logical negation!
enjoys(vincent,X):- \+ bigKahunaBurger(X),burger(X).
?- enjoys(vincent,X).
no
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 44
Meta-Predicates
Meta-predicates are used to match, query, and manipulate other predicates in the problem domain.
Examples of meta-predicates: assert(Term) : adds Term to the current set of clauses. retract(Term): removes Term from the current set of clauses. call(Clause) : succeeds with the execution of Clause clause(Head,Body) : unifies Body with the body of a clause
whose head unifies with Head
Through meta-predicates Prolog can analyze, transform, and simulate other programs.
It can even learn not only new data knowledge, but new procedural knowledge.
Agile Software Development Lab , Spring 2008
Prolog: Language and essential logic programming techniques 45
Summary
We introduced lists and some recursive predicates that work on lists.
The kind of programming that these predicates illustrated are fundamental to Prolog.
We introduced the programming technique of using accumulators, which often offer an efficient solution.
Showed how exception are realized in Prolog and why they shouldn’t be thought of as a logical negation.
Questions?
top related