q1 2017 office market report · both in q1 2016 and q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by...

7
OFFICE MARKET REPORT Moscow Q1 2017 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS The delivery volume of office space hit new historical lows at 21 thousand sq m, absolutely non-relevant for the first quarter of the year. The Class A vacancy rate was quite steady at 20.2% since the end of 2016. Class B offices saw greater demand, and the vacancy rate sank by 1.5 p. p. to the level of 14%. Downtrend of Class B rental rates was identified. For the first time in a long time, the average rate showed plus adjustment of 0.4% and amounted to 13,430 rub./sq m/year. Class A rents resumed their downward slide by 4% by the quarter to 23,302 rub./sq m/year.

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Q1 2017 Office market repOrt · both in Q1 2016 and Q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by FMCG, pharmaceutical and health companies. The demand for office units of up to 1,000

Office marketrepOrtmoscow

Q1 2017

research

highlights � The delivery volume of office space hit new historical lows at 21 thousand sq m, absolutely non-relevant for the first quarter of the year.

� The Class A vacancy rate was quite steady at 20.2% since the end of 2016. Class B offices saw greater demand, and the vacancy rate sank by 1.5 p. p. to the level of 14%.

� Downtrend of Class B rental rates was identified. For the first time in a long time, the average rate showed plus adjustment of 0.4% and amounted to 13,430 rub./sq m/year. Class A rents resumed their downward slide by 4% by the quarter to 23,302 rub./sq m/year.

Page 2: Q1 2017 Office market repOrt · both in Q1 2016 and Q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by FMCG, pharmaceutical and health companies. The demand for office units of up to 1,000

2

Office market repOrt. mOscOw

Class A and B new delivery volume dynamics

Key indicators. Dynamics*

ʺThe results of Q1 2017 clearly demonstrate that we are now standing on the verge of fundamental changes. They were not witnessed by the market for more than two years – since December 2014. A slight increase in rental rates in the most in-demand Class B offices was encouraged by moderate but stable demand, shaped by the activity of state-owned Russian companies, the slowdown of new construction and, as a result, the reduction of new construction volumes to record levels. This is a sign that the market is finding a way out of the crisis. If the demand lasts, the interests of landlords will be strengthened and a certain increase in rates can become a trend that determines the relationship between tenants and landlords for the next 2–3 yearsʺ.

Konstantin LosiukovDirector, Office Department, Knight Frank

Office market report Moscow

Class А Class В

Total stock, thousand sq m 15,876

including, thousand sq m 3,905 11,971

New delivery volume in Q1 2017, thousand sq m 21

including, thousand sq m 14 7

Vacancy rate, % 20.2(-0.5 p. p.)*

14 (-1.4 p. p.)*

Average weighed asking rental rate**, RUR/sq m/year 23,302(-4.0%)*

13,430(0.4%)*

Rental rates range**, RUR/sq m/year 10,000–45,000 7,500–35,000

OPEX rate range***, RUR/sq m/year 4,000–7,500 2,500–4,500

* Compared to Q4 2016** Excluding operational expenses, utility bills and VAT (18%)*** OPEX rate does not consider change related to property tax rate increase

Source: Knight Frank Research, 2017

Source: Knight Frank Research, 2017

Class А Class В

thousand sq m

2000

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2018F2017F

Page 3: Q1 2017 Office market repOrt · both in Q1 2016 and Q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by FMCG, pharmaceutical and health companies. The demand for office units of up to 1,000

3

ReseaRchQ1 2017

SupplyThe overall supply of quality office space in Moscow totalled 15.9 million sq m in Q1 2017. 25% of them belonged to Class A offices and 75% to Class B.

New anti-record delivery was updated the last quarter: only 21,143 sq m were introduced for the first 3 months. Nevertheless, at around 350 thousand sq m have been declared for commissioning, which even exceeds altogether the delivery level of office centres in 2016.

Two major Moscow developers – KR Properties and O1 Properties – simulta-neously announced their plans to resume construction of their office projects and started an active stage of their imple-mentation: the delivery of Bolshevik and Rassvet business centres is scheduled for 2018–2019.

The Class A vacancy rate went on declining originating from the mid-2015 and reaching 20.2% in the first quarter of 2017. This drop was caused by the decrease new construction volume and the presence of a small but stable demand for office space.

The Class B vacancy rate also remained in a last year's downtrend at 14% for Q1 2017.

Further reduction of the vacancy rate both in Class A and B offices is projected in 2017.

Map of projects scheduled for delivery in 2017

The building class is indicated according to the Moscow Research Forum Office Classification of 2013

Source: Knight Frank Research, 2017

Rublevskoe Hwy

Leningradskoe Hw

y

Volokolamskoe Hwy

Altu

fievs

koe

Hw

y

Dm

itrovsoe Hw

y

Ryazanskiy Hwy

Kashirskoye Hwy

TTR

TTR

GR

MKAD

MKAD

MKAD

Yaro

slavs

ko

ye Hwy

Lenin

skiy

HwyPr

ofso

yuzn

aya

St

Vars

havs

koye

Hw

y

Volgogradskiy Hwy

Entuziastov Hwy

Scholkovskoye Hwy

Kutuzovskiy Hwy

Class А Class ВExisting

Under construction

Bernikov12,841 sq m

Kvadrat9,483 sq m

Fili Grad (phase II)24,640 sq m

Neopolis52,700 sq m

IQ-quarter75,196 sq m Oasis

39,493 sq m

VTB Arena Park (phase I)23,962 sq m

Federation Tower (East)82,610 sq m

Большевик (фаза I)14,143 sq m

20 bld. 7 Nagornaya St10,400 sq m

Dubrovka Plaza7,000 sq m

Bernikov12,841 sq m

Kvadrat9,483 sq m

Fili Grad (phase II)24,640 sq m

Neopolis52,700 sq m

IQ-quarter75,196 sq m Oasis

39,493 sq m

VTB Arena Park (phase I)23,962 sq m

Federation Tower (East)82,610 sq m

Большевик (фаза I)14,143 sq m

20 bld. 7 Nagornaya St10,400 sq m

Dubrovka Plaza7,000 sq m

The net take-up and vacancy rate dynamics

Source: Knight Frank Research, 2017

11.5%

15.3%16.5% 15.4%

13.5%16.2%

29.8%24.4%

20.7%18.8%

Take-up volume Delievery volume Vacancy rate

Class А Class Вthousand sq m

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017F 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017F00

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40%

Page 4: Q1 2017 Office market repOrt · both in Q1 2016 and Q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by FMCG, pharmaceutical and health companies. The demand for office units of up to 1,000

4

Office market repOrt. mOscOw

30%

15%

13%8%

7%

3%

4%

9%

8%

3%

Banking / Finance / InvestmentFMCG*PharmaceuticalB2BReal Estate / ConstructionManufacturingTMT**Oil / Gas / Mining and EnergyConfidentialOther***

TTR–MKADGR–TTRBR–GRBR

2,594

10,145

1,634

7,244

10,892

26,108

7,258

5,000

10 000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000sq m Class А Class В

Distribution of leased office space depending on the company profile and location of the office building

* Fast moving consumer goods** Technology, media and telecommunications*** Non-profit / Transport&Logistic

Source: Knight Frank Research, 2017

Distribution of leased office units by size

Source: Knight Frank Research, 2017

Demand86.2 sq m were taken-up for the first quarter, half the volume of the same period last year (27.4 thousand sq m in Class A offices and 58.8 thousand sq m in Class B). Interestingly, the high take-up index of 2016 was primarily due to the closure of two major transactions, which accounted for almost 80% of the total volume. The demand for offices was more even in Q1 2017.

Q1 was marked by a significant demand for office space in business centers inside the Garden Ring. However, this cannot become the new trend. Tenants have to look for

offices between the Garden Ring and the Moscow Ring Road (64% of the total transaction volume) due to the decreasing number of parking spaces, their increasing cost, rumors of entry fee to the city center.

Banks and financial institutions completed the major number of transactions (30%) both in Q1 2016 and Q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by FMCG, pharmaceutical and health companies.

The demand for office units of up to 1,000 sq m increased substantially from the same period last year. Thus, a year ago

the transactions with such units reached 50%, now it has run up to 60%.

The demand for small office units was trending upward as the average size of the transaction totaled 1,180 sq m in Q1.

Renewal transactions of the current lease agreements are still dominant accounting for 60% of the total transaction amount. Notably, the ratio of new leases and renewals is 80/20. This means that major tenants prefer to negotiate renewals with the landlords, and the demand for new office space is shaped by companies requiring small office units.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40%

Up to 500 sq m 500–1,000 sq m 1,000–2,000 sq m 2,000–5,000 sq m 5,000–10,000 sq m More than 10,000 sq m

Q1 2017Q1 2016

Page 5: Q1 2017 Office market repOrt · both in Q1 2016 and Q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by FMCG, pharmaceutical and health companies. The demand for office units of up to 1,000

5

ReseaRchQ1 2017

Key lease and purchase transactions closed in Q1 2017

Company Area, sq m Office building Class Address Transaction type

BBDO 11,030 Novospasskiy Dvor B+ 7, Derbenevskaya Emb Lease

Russian Agricultural Bank 9,200 Incom City B+ 7, bld 1, 1st Krasnogvardeyskiy Passage Sale

LOCKO-Bank 4,467 Skylight a 39, Leningradskiy Ave Sale

Samsung R&D Institute Rus 4,375 Dvintsev a 12, bld 1, Dvintsev St Lease

Panasonic* 3,122 Shabolovka 31 B+ 31, Shabolovka St Lease

Toyota Bank 3,030 Silver City a 29, Serebryanicheskaya Emb Lease

Regus 2,594 Vozdvizhenka Centre a 10, Vozdvizhenka St Lease

Ingrad Realty 2,523 Hermitage Plaza a 2, bld 13/4, Krasnoproletarskaya St Lease

X5 (Perekrestok) 2,400 rts B+ 26/27, Sredniy Kalitnikovskaya Passage Lease

Komatsu* 2,125 Diapazon B+ 10, 1st Volokolamskiy Passage Lease

Herbalife 2,079 Citydel a 9, Zemlyanoiy Val St Lease

* Knight Frank acted as a consultant of the transactionSource: Knight Frank Research, 2017

Commercial termsLandlords of Class B properties could celebrate the change of downward movement of rents for the first time in the last three years. The correction was positive by 0.4% – to the level of 13,430 RUR/sq m/year following the results of the first three months of the year.

But, the decline of Class A rents is still in progress, falling by 4% against the end of 2016 to 23,302 RUR/sq m/year. This is largely due to too much supply in the territories of the Third Transport Ring-Moscow Ring Road (29.5% of the total supply volume) and outside the Moscow Ring Road (21.4%), as well as the bulk of vacant space in office centres in the territories of the Third Transport Ring-Moscow Ring Road (965 thousand sq m) and outside the Moscow Ring Road (984 thousand sq m).

Landlords have started to experience cau-tious optimism thanks to the stabilization of rental rates. Some of them became less flexible in negotiations regarding rental rates discussion at the beginning of 2017. The discount from the asking rental rate could reach 20–30% in the midst of 2015 crisis – early 2016, but now the discount

Average asking rental rates dynamics for Class A and B offices denominated in RUr

Source: Knight Frank Research, 2017

RUR/sq m/year

RUR/sq m/year RUR/sq m/yearClass А Class В

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017F

Class А Class В

Q1 Q1Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q42015 2016 2017

Q12017

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q42015 2016

20,569

37,311

21,28423,086

24,398 25,885 25,525

30,144

25,14924,280

15,331

21,143

12,707 13,821 14,110 15,00915,698 17,150

15,10313,379

22,500

13,400

7,000

12,000

17,000

22,000

27,000

32,000

37,000

42,000

28,09327,321

26,670

25,149

24,72624,662

24,43424,280

23,000

25,000

27,000

29,00016,769

15,73115,452

15,10314,613

13,89913,384

13,37913,000

14,500

16,000

17,500

23,30213,430

Page 6: Q1 2017 Office market repOrt · both in Q1 2016 and Q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by FMCG, pharmaceutical and health companies. The demand for office units of up to 1,000

6

Office market repOrt. mOscOw

rate has fallen to 7–10%. However, it is too early to speak of the general market trend.

No changes occurred regarding the terms of lease agreements earlier this year: they are mostly 3–5 years with the right of early termination upon the expiry of the third year. The ruble has become the dominant currency on lease agreements.

ForecastDespite the low Q1 delivery, this year shall add about 350 thousand sq m to the market, which in general exceeds the figure of 2016. However, there is still a high probability that the delivery dates of

North Tower, MIBC "Moscow City"

new business centres announced for this year will be postponed. Nevertheless, some developers owning the projects in readily marketable locations, have declared the construction renewals of projects frozen earlier. Though, it is too early to call it a new trend of 2017, since the vacancy rate is still too high: 788 thousand sq m in Class A offices and 1,676 thousand sq m in Class B.

We expect the stabilization of Class A rates in 2017. Despite the positive correction of Class B rents in Q1 2017, we do not assume their significant growth in 2017 for all of the market. Rental rates may even increase in some business districts most in demand,

and landlords of less demanded business centres will be forced to further reduce rates and be more flexible in negotiations with potential tenants.

In general, provided that external economic and political stability is maintained, we do not expect any significant changes in the office market in 2017. Its participants go on taking wait-and-see attitude and will carefully catch the signals sent to them by the market. Any changes in the market can be identified either at the end of the year, an in 2018, which, among other things, may be due to the next elective cycle of the country approaching in 2018.

Page 7: Q1 2017 Office market repOrt · both in Q1 2016 and Q1 2017. 28% of transactions were closed by FMCG, pharmaceutical and health companies. The demand for office units of up to 1,000

7

ReseaRchQ1 2017

Submarket

Lease Area,

thousand sq m

Class A Class B

Average rental rates*Vacancy rate, %

Average rental rates*Vacancy rate, % USD/sq

m/yearRUR/sq m/

year USD/sq m/year

RUR/sq m/year

Boulevard Ring

Central business district 712 712 39,186 21.3 459 24,309 9.3

Garden Ring

South 950 431

464

23,715

25,546

16.4

15.9

525

403

27,814

21,379

10.4

12.5

West 286 – 34,125 16.5 – 24,322 14.7

North 660 – 24,042 17.3 394 20,877 6.3

East 401 – 23,246 11.1 293 15,546 15.7

Khamovniki 260 690 37,969 13.7 – 24,385 15.7

third Transport Ring

Leninskiy 278 –

535

29,410

18.8

280

15,637

14,846

15.5

11.3

Tulskiy 985 – – – – 13,468 9.7

Kievskiy 424 – 23,451 15.4 – 13,620 27.8

Presnenskiy 357 – 24,661 5.7 – 15,494 10.2

Prospekt Mira 162 - – – – 19,038 54.4

Tverskoy-Novoslobodskiy 752 578 31,765 19.5 387 20,493 10.1

Basmanniy 326 – – – – 14,179 5.6

Taganskiy 175 – – – 362 19,185 10.2

Volgogradskiy 418 – – – – 14,184 19.1

Lefortovo 195 – – – – 12,927 9.6

MIBC Moscow-City 913 524 28,794 20.3 – – –

TTR-MKAD

North 627 –

355

25,000

19,508

16.3

21.9

242

12,035

12,823

15.4

14.7

Northwest 692 460 25,290 11.3 – 15,047 20.9

South 1,152 – – – – 10,465 13.6

West 565 – – – 296 15,664 13.4

Southwest 626 – 11,643 32.8 – 14,016 16.1

East 453 – – – – 9,000 7.6

Preobrazhenskiy 291 – 13,286 60.8 – 14,831 22.2

mkaD

North 376 –

231

12,711

30.8

6,990

8,990

17.3

18.4

Northwest 308 – 10,808 44.6 – 6,724 26.1

South 260 – – – – 9,789 37.9

West 1,789 307 16,871 16.5 – 10,402 18.0

Southwest 215 – 11,643 37.9 – 8,003 12.6

East 248 – – – – 3,237 0.8

Total 15,856 424 23,302 20.1 253 13,430 14.0* Excluding operational expenses, utility bills and VAT (18%)

Source: Knight Frank Research, 2017

Moscow submarket data. Key indicators

ReSeARChOlga YaskoDirector, Russia & CIS [email protected]

OffiCeSKonstantin LosiukovDirector [email protected]

+7 (495) 981 0000

© Knight Frank LLP 2017 – This overview is published for general information only. Although high standards have been used in the preparation of the information, analysis, view and projections presented in this report, no legal responsibility can be accepted by Knight Frank Research or Knight Frank for any loss or damage resultant from the contents of this document. As a general report, this material does not necessarily represent the view of Knight Frank in relation to particular properties or projects.

Reproduction of this report in whole or in part is allowed with proper reference to Knight Frank.