modélisation multiéchellede la pyrolyse de biomasse...
TRANSCRIPT
Modélisationmultiéchelle delapyrolysedebiomasse:modèleDEAMetenthalpiesderéaction
identifiésgrâceàdesexpériencesmenéesàdifférenteséchelles
Prof. PatrickPerré
Auprogramme
• Contexte• Mesures à l’échelle micro-particule• Identificationdemodèles cinétiques• Laquestiondesenthalpiesderéaction• Expériences à l’échelle macro-particule• Lamodélisation comme lienentreéchelles• Conclusionetperspectives
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 2
• Heat treatment (or torrefaction) is a mildpyrolysis (up to 300°C) suitable for material orenergy end use.
• Material: gain of physico-chemical properties,durability.
• Energy: homogenization of physico-chemical andmechanical properties, energy concentration,reduced hygroscopicity, loss of mechanicalproperties (more brittle).
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 3
Context
Reversible/irreversiblechanges
Bergman, 2005
Irreversible
Reversible
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 4
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 5
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
0 20 40 60 80
GC
V (k
cl k
g-1)
Mass loss (%)
E. grandis
E. saligna
C. citriodora
untreated
220°C*
250°C
280°C
charcoal
GCV=37.20WL+4654R2 =0.99
180°C
Grosscalorificvalue´Massloss(eucalyptus,5hours).
Almeida, G., Brito, J.O., Perré, P., 2010. Bioresource Technology, 101: 9778-84.
Previousworks
• Themassloss (ML)was proved tobe asyntheticindicator abletopredict thealterations ofseveralphysical properties.Thismeans that MLrepresentsthecumulativeeffects oftemperature anddurationorany morecomplex pathway T =f(t)
6
Ourmodelling strategy is therefore focusedonits prediction
Almeida, G., Brito, J.O., Perré, P., 2010, Bioresource Technology, 101: 9778-84Almeida G., Santos D., Perré P., 2014, Biomass and Bioenergy , 70: 407-415.
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Previousworks
OverviewofthemodellingstrategySpatial scale
Applied configurationsBasic knowledge
Micro-particulePore/cell/
inclusion
Set of particles
Particle
Industry/structure Macroscopic scale:
coupled mechanisms
Macro-particule
Process
Multiscale approach
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 7
Microscopic scale : kinetics model
Basicinformation:ATGfordifferentheating pathwaysPerte de masse (%) de la masse anhydre
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Temps (s)
Per
te d
e m
ass
e (%
)
210 °C
195°C
175 °C
215°C
235°C
245°C
250°C
255°C
265°C
Rousset et al., Annals Forest Sci. 2006
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 9
Classicalkineticmodelsfromliterature
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 10
Cavagnol et al. 2013, Thermochemica Acta, 574:1-9.
Principleoftheinverseprocedure
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 11
Cavagnol et al. 2013, Thermochemica Acta, 574:1-9.
Exampleoffittingquality(Locust,modelB)
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 12
Cavagnol et al. 2013, Thermochemica Acta, 574:1-9.
ResiduesformodelsA,BandC
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 13
Cavagnol et al. 2013, Thermochemica Acta, 574:1-9.
RobustnessoftheDAEMmodel
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 15
Cavagnol et al. 2015, Can. J. Chemical Engineering, 93:331–339.
Experiment
Multi-stepmodel
DAEMmodel
Temperature
CalibrationofMLusingelementaryanalysis
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 16
Cavagnol et al. 2015, Can. J. Chemical Engineering, 93:331–339.
PredictionofMLusingtheDAEMmodel
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 17
Cavagnol et al. 2015, Can. J. Chemical Engineering, 93:331–339.
Validationondynamictests
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 18
ü Stillopenquestionsregardingvalidation(additionaltestsunderprogress)
ü Heatfluxtoosmalltobemeasureddirectly(pb ofbaseline):theheatsofreactioncannotbedertermined atthisscale.
ü AvalidatedDAEMmodelcouldoffernewpossibilities…
Heat and mass transfer within
particles
Thermal degradation of
wood componentsBiomassà solid residues
+volatiles
Localscale
Modellingstrategyatthemacro-particule level
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 20
21
Water
Enthalpy
Air&gas
• Formulationofheatandmasstransfer
( ) ( ) ( )vv v Deffb bbw g w g v
w g w g gw v w v gt
re e r wr r r r r¶+ + + Ñ× + + = Ñ× Ñ
¶
( ) i i
S SS S S G S
itu m mer r
• •¶+ Ñ× = -
¶
æ ö× +ç ÷
è øå
( ) ( ) ( )* *
1,2,4,5v D i
i
effg g a
g g g a Ga a g
i Gt
M mM
e wr r r
•
=
¶+ Ñ× = Ñ× Ñ
¶+ å
( )( )
( )
* *
* *
( )
v + v ( )v
K D ( )
bw w g v b o s g
b bw w v g b
eff effv v a a
w g g ggw v a a
w g gw v a a
gg R
h h h h ht
h h h h
h h H
P
T
e e r e
r
w w
r r r r
r r r
r
¶+ + + + -
¶
Ñ × + + +
= Ñ × Ñ + Ñ + Ñ - D
Solid
Macroscopic formulation
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Turner et al, 2010, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53: 715-725
Macroscopic formulation
221/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Turner et al, 2010, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53: 715-725
Experimentaldeviceatthemacro-particlescale
• Control(andmeasurement)ofO2
• Temperatureandpressureinsideparticle• Globalmassloss
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 23
60cm
241/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Turner et al, 2010, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53: 715-725
Temperatureovershootduetoexothermicreactions(isothermaltestsat280°C)
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 25
Pachon et al., SFGP, 2017
Lasimulationprédictive
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 26
Formulation (modèle)
Mesure ou prédiction Paramètres
Simulation Validation
Prédiction Contrôle/commande
Identification
Identificationofreaction enthalpies
27
Turner et al, 2010, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53: 715-725
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Modelvalidation
281/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Turner et al, 2010, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53: 715-725
Simulation:oven-dryboard
29Rémond, Turner, Perré, 2010, Drying Technology, 28: 1013-1022
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Simulation:20%initialMC
301/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélecRémond, Turner, Perré, 2010, Drying Technology, 28: 1013-1022
Effect ofthickness/MC
311/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélecRémond, Turner, Perré, 2010, Drying Technology, 28: 1013-1022
Pre-treatmentbymildpyrolysis
Perré, Rémond, Turner, 2013, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 64: 838-849
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 33
34
Airflow Board
RL
T Boardmesh
zColumn i-1
Layer j
Column i Column i+1
Control volume
Layer j+1
x+ dxx
jCjVjLqa
qv
qa
qv
x
PhysicalformulationattheGlobalScale:TheStack
up, j lo, j 1vv v
dqj j
dx+= +Water
Air&gas up, j lo, j 1aa a
dqj j
dx+= +
up, j lo, j 1pa a pv v c c
up, j up, jv pv surf
lo, j 1 lo, j 1v pv surf
lo, j 1 lo, j 1a pa surf
up, j up, ja pa surf
dT(C q C q ) j jdx
j (C (T T)
j (C (T T)
j (C (T T)
j (C (T T)
+
+ +
+ +
+ = +
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
Enthalpy
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Perré, Rémond, Turner, 2013, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 64: 838-849
35
2.0mInlet Outlet
1 6 11 35mm20mm
20mm
• 11IDENTICALBeech boards• Vair=2m/s•Mcinit=3%
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Perré, Rémond, Turner, 2013, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 64: 838-849
36
2.0mInlet Outlet
1 6 11 35mm
20mm
20mm
A=35mm,3%MCB=35mm,20%MCC=18mm,3%MC
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Perré, Rémond, Turner, 2013, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 64: 838-849
37
2.0mInlet Outlet
1 6 11 35mm
20mm
20mm
A=35mm,3%MCB=35mm,20%MCC=18mm,3%MC
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Perré, Rémond, Turner, 2013, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 64: 838-849
Effect ofgas velocity
38
220
230
240
250
260
270
ConfA(Reference) velocity=5m/s Velocity=8m/s Velocity=11m/s
Tmaxatcore(°C)
Board1 Board6 Board11
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec
Perré, Rémond, Turner, 2013, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 64: 838-849
Conclusion• Microparticle kinetics
– Modelparametersdeterminedbyinverseanalysisofseveralexperimentssimultaneously
– GoodpredictionabilityofDAEM– Heatfluxnotaccurateenoughtodeterminetheheatsofreaction
• Macroscopicmodelling– Heat&masstransfercoupledtokineticsreactions(2-way
coupling)– Heatsofreactionsdeterminedbyinverseanalysisusingthecore
temperatureofsample• Dualscalemodel
– Onemacromodelforeachparticle– Amasterstackmodel– comprehensiveandpredictivemodelisabletoaddresspractical
configurations
1/06/2017 PatrickPerré,CentraleSupélec 39