crs report 2009

Upload: geethanambiar

Post on 04-Jun-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    1/100

    VITAL STATISTICS OF INDIA

    BASED ON THE

    CIVIL REGISTRATION SYSTEM

    2009

    OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, INDIA

    MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

    VITAL STATISTICS DIVISION

    WEST BLOCK-I, R. K. PURAMNEW DELHI- 110066

    ENSURE REGISTRATION OF EVERY BIRTH AND DEATH

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    2/100

    PREFACE

    This issue of the Report on Vital Statistics of India based on the Civil

    Registration System for the year 200 provides an overvie! of the !or"ing of the

    Civil Registration System #CRS$ in the country and presents a compilation of data

    on registered births% deaths and infant deaths !ith rural&urban ' se(&!ise brea"&up and se( ratio at birth based on Civil Registration Records) Ideally% an *nnual

    Report on vital statistics containing more detailed information should have been

    brought out) +o!ever% due to non&availability of *nnual Reports from some of the

    ma,or States and limited availability of information contained in the *nnual Reports

    of other States% the report for the year 200 containing "ey information has been

    brought out for the convenience of users) *n attempt has been made to present

    more detailed analysis as compared to previous Reports)

    2) The publication is divided into t!o parts) -art I provide a brief revie! of the

    Civil Registration System and contains a summary analysis of data on registeredbirths% deaths% infant deaths and se( ratio at birth at State level) -art II

    incorporates the main tables !hich provide State and .istrict&!ise data on

    registered births% deaths and infant deaths !ith rural&urban ' se(&!ise brea"&up

    and se( ratio at birth)

    /) The data source for the report is the statutory *nnual Statistical Report

    prepared by the Chief Registrars of irths ' .eaths) In respect of States !here

    these reports have not been prepared% the information provided by the Chief

    Registrars has been used) I ta"e this opportunity to e(press my sincere gratitude

    to all the Chief Registrars of irths ' .eaths for their "ind co&operation inproviding the re1uired information)

    ) The report has been prepared in the Vital Statistics .ivision of this office) I

    !ould li"e to place on record my appreciation for the efforts put in by Smt) -) *)

    3ini% .eputy Registrar 4eneral% Shri R) 5) 4autam% 6oint .irector% Shri *,ay

    5hanna% .eputy .irector% Shri Sandeep Rai% *ssistant .irector and Shri Vimal

    5aul% Sr) Compiler under the overall guidance of Shri .eepa" Rastogi% *dditional

    Registrar 4eneral% India)

    .r) C) Chandramouli7e! .elhi Registrar 4eneral '

    3ay% 208/ Census Commissioner% India

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    3/100

    CONTENTSPag

    N

    Map 1 Level of Registration of Births, 2009

    Map 2 Level of Registration of Deaths, 2009

    Map 3 Sex Ratio at Birth, 2009

    Overview of Civil Registration SystemExecutiveSummaryGlossary ofTerms

    Part I - Review and Analysis

    Civil Registration System - At a Glance

    Chapter ICivil Registration System - AnIntroduction

    Chapter II Important observations on working of the RBD Act Report for the year 2009

    Chapter III A Brief Analysis of Data on registered Births, Deaths and Infant Deaths

    List of Statements

    Statement 1 Number of registration units and level of reporting

    Statement 2 Number of registered births and deaths at the national level, 1981 2009

    Statement 3Number of registered births by States/ Union Territories, 2000-2009

    Statement 4Number of registered deaths by States/ Union Territories, 2000-2009

    Statement 5 Number of registered infant deaths by States/ Union Territories, 2000-2009

    Statement 6 Percentage distribution of registered infant deaths by place of occurrence, 2009

    Statement 7Percentage distribution of infant deaths by sex,2009

    Statement 8Level of Registration of Births, 2000-2009

    Statement 9Level of Registration of Deaths, 2000-2009

    Statement 10 Major States (Population above 10 million as per Result of 2011 Census) classified bytheir level of registration, 2008 and 2009

    Statement 11Crude Birth & Death Rates based on CRS & SRS and LOR- States/Union Territories,2009

    Statement 12 Sex Ratio at Birth based on registered events, 2000-2009

    List of Charts

    Chart 1Number of Registered Births, 1981-2009

    Chart 2Number of Registered Deaths, 1981-2009

    Chart 3 Sex-wise Distribution of Registered Births, 2009

    Chart 4 Sex-wise Distribution of Registered Deaths, 2009

    Chart 5 Sex-wise Registered Births of Major States, 2009

    Chart 6 Sex-wise Registered Deaths of Major States, 2009

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    4/100

    Chart 7 Estimated & Registered Births, 2000-2009

    Chart 8 Estimated & Registered Deaths, 2000-2009

    Chart 9Share of Major States in total registered and estimated births,2009

    Chart 10Share of Major States in total registered and estimated deaths,2009

    Chart 11 Live Birth by Medical Attention at Birth

    Chart 12 Medical Attention at the time of Death

    Chart 13 Level of Registration of Births and Deaths, 2009

    Chart 14 Level of Registration of Births of States/UTs, 2009

    Chart 15Level of Registration of Deaths of States/UTs,2009

    Chart 16 Level of Registration of Births and Deaths of States/UTs, 2009

    Chart 17Level of Registration excluding Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, 2000-2009

    Chart 18 LOR of births, EAG & Assam, Southern and Other States/UTs, 2000-2009

    Chart 19 LOR of deaths EAG & Assam, Southern and Other States/UTs, 2000-2009

    Chart 20Crude Birth Rate based on CRS and SRS, 2000-2009

    Chart 21 Crude Birth Rate based on CRS and SRS of better performing major StatesChart 22 Statewise Crude Birth Rate, 2009

    Chart 23Crude Death Rate based on CRS and SRS, 2000-2009

    Chart 24 Crude Death Rate based on CRS and SRS of better performing major States

    Chart 25 Statewise Crude Death Rate, 2009

    Chart 26 Infant Mortality Rate based on CRS, 2000-2009

    Chart 27 Percentage of infant deaths to total registered deaths, 2000-2009

    Chart 28 Sex Ratio based on Registered Births, 2009

    Chart 29 Sex Ratio at Births based on CRS and SRS, 2000-2008

    Part II - List of Detailed Tables

    Table 1 Number of live births registered by sex and residence, 2009

    Table 2 Number of deaths registered by sex and residence, 2009

    Table 3 Number of infant deaths registered by sex and residence, 2009

    Table 4 Crude Birth Rate based on CRS and SRS - States/Union Territories, 2009

    Table 5 Crude Death Rate based on CRS and SRS - States/Union Territories, 2009

    Table 6 Infant Mortality Rate based on registered births and infant deaths, 2009

    Table 7 Level of Registration of births and deaths - States / Union Territories, 2009

    Table 8 Number of live births registered - States/Union Territories/Districts, 2009

    Table 9Number of deaths registered - States/Union Territories/Districts,2009

    Table 10 Number of infant deaths registered - States/Union Territories/Districts, 2009

    Table 11

    Death by Age and Sex of the deceased,

    2009

    Annexure

    Civil Registration Hierarchy in States and Union Territories

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    5/100

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    6/100

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    7/100

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    8/100

    O!"#!$ %& C##' R!(#)*"+*#% S)*! /CRS

    1. Registration of birth is a right of the child and is the first step towards establishing theiridentity.

    2. It is compulsory to report births and deaths to the Registrar of Births and Deaths under theRegistration of Births and Deaths Act, 199.

    !. Births and Deaths are registered only at the place of their occurrence.

    ". #ead of the household is responsible to report births and deaths that occurred in thehouse to the Registrar of Births and Deaths.

    $. It is the responsibility of the officer in charge to report the births and deaths that occur in

    hospitals, nursing homes, health centres, etc. to the Registrar of Births and Deaths of the

    concerned area.

    . %or reporting of e&ents, prescribed forms are used, %orm 1 for li&e birth, %orm 2 for death

    and %orm ! for still birth.

    '. (idwi&es and other (edical and )ara*medical persons who ha&e attended a birth of a

    child are duty bound to notify the Registrar about the occurrence of the birth.

    +. eepers of crematoria and burial grounds, and persons re-uired to be present at such

    places by a local authority are re-uired to notify the Registrar about the occurrence of the

    death.

    9. he Registrar of Births and Deaths ha&e the power to obtain information regarding

    birth/death from those who are in the 0nowledge.

    1. Births and deaths are to be reported within 21 days of occurrence of the e&ent.

    11. A Birth/Death certificate is to be issued free of charge for e&ents reported within 21 days.

    12. Births and deaths reported after 21 days but within ! days can be registered on payment

    of prescribed late fee.

    1!. Births and death reported after ! days but within one year can be registered on

    production of an affida&it, permission of the prescribed authority and payment of a late

    fee.

    1". Births and deaths reported after one year can be registered only with the permission of a%irst lass (agistrate and payment of prescribed late fee.

    1$. Births can be registered without name of the child.

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    9/100

    1. 3ame of the child can be reported to the registrar for entering in the Birth Register within

    one year of registration free of charge.

    1'. 3ame of the child can also be entered after one year but within 1$ years of registration on

    payment of prescribed late fee.

    1+. )ersons gi&ing information about births/deaths are re-uired to gi&e it under their

    signature.

    19. 4rrors in the particulars of births or deaths in the registers can be corrected according to

    the prescribed procedure.

    2. 5rong and fraudulent entries can be cancelled by the Registrar of Births 6 Deaths.

    21. 7nder 8ection 1' of the RBD Act, 199, any person can cause a search in the birth/death

    registers for any entry and obtain a certified etract :Birth/Death ertificate;.

    22. 4tracts issued under 8ection 1' of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act shall be

    admissible as e&idence of birth or death to which the entry relates.

    2!. All Registrars are to send a monthly return to the District Registrar or hief Registrar.

    2". Births that occurred outside the country can also be registered in India within sity days of

    return of the family at the place where they settle.

    2$. here is no pro&ision to register deaths that occurred outside the country.

    2. 3on*reporting of births and deaths, gi&ing false information for inclusion in the register,

    refusing to put signature in the reporting form/register and non registration of e&ents

    reported to the registrar is a punishable offence.

    2'. 7nder the RBD Act, 199, Registrars and 8ub*Registrars are the public ser&ants.

    2+. Registration of births and deaths made prior to implementation of the Registration of

    Births and Deaths Act, 199 is deemed to ha&e been done under the same Act.

    29.

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    10/100

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    * unified process of continuous% permanent and compulsory recording of the vital

    events and characteristics thereof% as provided through the legal re1uirements of the

    country% is called Civil Registration System #CRS$) In India% the Registration of irths and

    .eaths *ct% 89% provides for the compulsory registration of births and deaths)CivilRegistration records are the best source of Vital Statistics) The records resulting from

    Civil Registration System have t!o main uses) :irst% as a personal legal document%

    re1uired by citi;ens as proof of facts e)g) age% identity etc and second% the data generated

    through a complete and up to date System of Civil Registration are essential for socio&

    economic planning and also to evaluate the effectiveness of various publics related

    programs) They also serve as the cornerstone of public health systems) This *nnual

    Statistical Report on Vital Statistics of India for the year 200 has been brought out on the

    basis of data made available by theChief nion Territories) The main findings of the report have been

    summari;ed belo!?

    VIT*@ I7.IC*TARSVIT*@ I7.IC*TARSVIT*@ I7.IC*TARSVIT*@ I7.IC*TARS???? 7ot!ithstanding the difference in approach of data collection

    bet!een CRS and Sample Registration System #SRS$% a comparison of vital rates based on

    these t!o sources helps in evaluating the performance of CRS over SRS)@evel of reporting

    helps in revie!ing the registration system and defining measures that !ould be necessary

    to improve registration levels across the country) It is around B8 of the registration units

    at national level during 200) Such reporting level by rural and urban registration units

    are about B0 and B9 respectively)

    irth Registration?irth Registration?irth Registration?irth Registration?

    The number of reported registered births has more than doubled in the year 200as compared to 8B8 #increased to 28)/ million in 200 from B)9 million in 8B8$)

    The share of registered births to total estimated births under SRS is increasing

    year by year !hich in result sho!s the significant improvement in birth registration)

    The share of male registration is more than the female for registered births)

    The level of registration of births has increased from D9)2 per cent in 2000 to B8)/

    per cent in 200)

    The level of registration of births is above 0 percent in as many as B ma,or States

    namely 4u,arat% +aryana% 5arnata"a% 5erala% 3aharashtra% -un,ab% Ra,asthan and

    Tamil 7adu in 200)

    The birth rate !or"ed out to 8B)/ per thousand populations during 200 ascompared to 22)D from SRS birth rates)

    The gap bet!een the birth rates based on CRS and SRS is narro!ing do!n over the

    year !hich is a good indication of improvement in the functioning of CRS)

    irth Rate reported under CRS in some of the better performing States namely

    4u,arat% 5erala% 3aharashtra and -un,ab is on higher side than that of SRS birth

    rate) This difference may be due to the fact that SRS estimates are based on usual

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    11/100

    residence !hile events registered at the place of occurrence irrespective of the

    place of residence under CRS)

    The Se( Ratio at irth has sho!n do!nfall of 9 points during 200 as compared to

    200B and it is BB)

    The gap bet!een the se( ratio at birth based on registered data and that of from

    SRS has been narro!ing do!n during the period 2000&200B) +ighest Se( Ratio has been reported by 5arnata"a #8088$ follo!ed by *ndhra

    -radesh #BD$ during 200)

    @o!est Se( Ratio has been reported by ihar #E8D$ follo!ed by *runachal -radesh

    #B09$)

    .eath Registration?.eath Registration?.eath Registration?.eath Registration?

    The number of registered deaths has also more than doubled in the year 200 as

    compared to 8B8 #D)E million in 200 from 2)E million in 8B8$)

    The share of registered deaths to total estimated deaths under SRS is increasing

    year by year !ith fluctuating trend) The share of male is more than the female in case of death registration)

    The share of rural is about /=Dth in case of death registration in total registered

    deaths during 200)

    The level of registration of deaths has increased from B)E per cent in 2000 to 99)

    per cent in 200)

    In respect of the level in registration of deaths% only / ma,or States namely 5erala%

    -un,ab and could achieve 0 percent and more in the year 200)

    The death rate !or"ed out to ) per thousand populations during 200 as

    compared to E)/ from SRS death rates)

    3ore infant deaths have been registered in urban area than the rural area) *mong all States% only D States namely 4oa% 5erala% 3i;oram% -un,ab and Tamil

    7adu have achieved the level of more than 0 per cent registration of both births

    and deaths during 200)

    * substantial gap can be seen in the level of registration of births and deaths

    bet!een three groups% i$Ts) The netting of infant deaths under the CRS continues to be a ma,or

    concern)

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    12/100

    GLOSSARY OF TERMS

    B#"*= >i&e birth or still birth.

    L#! #"*= omplete epulsion or etraction from its mother of a product of conception, irrespecti&e of the

    duration of pregnancy, which, after such epulsion or etraction, breathes or shows any other e&idence oflife, and each product of such birth is considered li&e*born.

    S*#'' B#"*= %oetal death where a product of conception has attained at least the prescribed period of

    gestation.

    Crude Birth Rate (CBR) = !"

    #$!" %%"& '

    D!+*= )ermanent disappearance of all e&idence of the life at any time after li&e birth has ta0en place.

    Crude eath Rate (CR) = " !"

    #$!" %%"& '

    I&+* D!+*= Death of a child less than one year old.

    *+,a+t -.rta/it0 Rate (*-R) = " " !"

    !"& '

    L!!' %& R!(#)*"+*#%= he le&el of registration, defined as the percentage of registered births/deaths to the

    births/deaths estimated through 8R8, determines the performance le&el of a 8tate / 7nion territory with

    regard to functioning of i&il Registration 8ystem.

    1e2e/ ., Re3i4trati.+ (15R) = re3i4tered !"

    " !" & '

    M#3 !+" P%45'+*#%= )opulation at the mid*point of the year, i.e., 1st?uly of the year.

    6u78er ., e4ti7ated e2e+t4 ,.r a 0ear = -id 9 0ear :.:u/ati.+ & ;R; Rate

    ;e< Rati. at 8irth (;RB) =

    " !"

    " !" & '

    @ross 3atural addition to the )opulation otal Registered Births otal Registered Deaths

    Rate of 3atural Increase BR* DR

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    13/100

    PART-I

    REVIEW AND ANALYSIS

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    14/100

    CIVIL REGISTRATION SYSTEMAT A GLANCE

    Note: Total registered births do not match with the total of male and female registered births due to non

    availability of sex-wise details from some of the States.

    D!%("+4#7 &!+*5"!) %& I3#+ +) 4!" *! C##' R!(#)*"+*#% S)*! /CRS

    R!(#)*"+*#% %& B#"*) 2008 200 2009

    i; 4stimated (id Cear )opulation :in ; 11!"2" 11$19 1122+

    ii; 4pected >i&e Births 219$9$" 222""9 22"1!

    iii; 3umber of Registered Births 19"9'$ 1999!'99 21292$'"

    i&; >e&el of Registration '".$ '." +1.!

    &; >e&el of Registration after ecluding 7.). 6 Bihar +.! +9.2 +9.2

    &i; rude Birth Rate :per thousand; 1'.2 1'." 1+.!

    R!(#)*"+*#% %& D!+*)

    i; 4pected Deaths +!91''+ +$11"$ +$1!""

    ii; 3umber of Registered Deaths $+"922 $!+1!1 $'''$

    iii; >e&el of Registration 9.! ." .9

    i&; >e&el of Registration after ecluding 7.). 6 Bihar '!.' '!.2 '$.

    &; rude Death Rate :per thousand; $.1 ".9 ".9

    R!(#)*"+*#% %& I&+* D!+*)

    i; 3umber of Registered Infant Deaths 1$2" 1'$2' 1++$

    ii; Infant (ortality Rate +. 9. +.

    iii; )ercentage of infant death to total deaths 2. !.1 !.2

    G"%)) N+*5"+' +33#*#% *% *! P%45'+*#%

    i; )erson 1!"+!" 1"!$$+ 1$1"+9

    ii; Rate of 3atural Increase :BR*DR; 12.1 12.$ 1!."

    S!: R+*#% +* B#"*

    i; 3umber of Registered (ale Births !+'2+$ '$11" 9$"$21

    ii; 3umber of Registered %emale Births $'$+9$ '1!$ +12!9

    iii; 8e Ratio at Birth 9! 9" +9+

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    15/100

    CHAT!" # $

    CIVIL REGISTRATION SYSTEM - AN INTRODUCTION

    1.1 he re-uirement for a complete and up to date Eital 8tatistical 8ystem to yield reliable data on &ital

    e&ents hardly needs any emphasis. hese data are essential for socio*economic planning and de&elopment

    and also to e&aluate the effecti&e implementation of &arious programs. he chief sources for data on &itale&ents in India are i&il Registration 8ystem :R8;, 8ample Registration 8ystem :8R8; and )opulation

    ensus. he )opulation ensus remains the main source of information on population and its

    characteristicsF howe&er, being a decennial eercise, it does not pro&ide the measure of population change

    from year to year. he measures of fertility and mortality deri&ed from the ensus are centered on the

    midpoint of the decade and as such do not pro&ide annual change in the population.

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    16/100

    an obHecti&e source for allocation of financial resources at 8tate and District le&el. he i&il Registration

    data ac-uires paramount importance in the wa0e of '!rdand '"thamendments to the constitution of India,

    as it can pro&ide data at local le&el for micro le&el planning, monitoring and e&aluation of schemes. At

    national le&el, the &ital statistics data generated through i&il Registration is -uite useful for medical

    research and in the study of se ratio, mortality and morbidity rates and also in the study of causes of

    deaths.

    R!(#)*"+*#% %& #"*) +3 3!+*) # I3#+

    1.$ In India, the registration of births and deaths is carried out under pro&isions of the Registration of

    Births and Deaths :RBD; Act, 199. he registration is done by the local Registrar appointed by the 8tate

    @o&ernment under whose Hurisdiction the e&ent has ta0en place.

    1. )ro&ision for registration of births and deaths and the mechanism thereof had been in eistence in

    India for more than a century, howe&er, the wor0 of registration was carried out under &arious laws and

    byelaws eisting at that time in different parts of the country. he need for impro&ement in the &ital

    statistics system was felt for long time and, therefore, on recommendations of &arious committees and

    conferences, the Registration of Births 6 Deaths Act, 199 pro&iding for compulsory registration of birthsand deaths was enacted. 8ince then, this Act has been enforced uniformly across all the 8tates and 7nion

    territories. his Act pro&ides for registration of births and deaths and publication of statistical reports

    annually based on the ci&il registration data. he enactment of the Registration of Births 6 Deaths Act,

    199 has pro&ided a common framewor0 for putting in place a sound system of registration of births and

    deaths in the country.

    1.' he registration wor0 at &arious le&els in 8tates/7nion erritories is performed by in&ol&ing officers

    of different Departments. he eisting organiGational set*up in&ol&ed in the wor0 of ci&il registration at

    &arious le&els in different 8tates/7nion erritories is gi&en at Anneure*A. A uni*linear hierarchy eists in '

    8tates/ 7s namely, Assam, #aryana, (eghalaya, a0shadweep, where

    #ealth Department is in&ol&ed at all le&els of registration. 8imilarly, )anchayat in erala, Re&enue in Dadra

    6 3agar #a&eli and >ocal Administration Department in )uducherry are responsible for eecution of this

    wor0 at all le&els. At present, #ealth Department super&ises the ci&il registration wor0 at 8tate le&el in 2

    8tates/7nion erritories and Department of )lanning, 4conomics 6 8tatistics in 12 8tates/ 7nion territories.

    1.+ In order to simplify and speed up the process of registration and to bring in uniformity in birth and

    death registration formats, the registration system was re&amped in the year 2. 7nder the re&amped

    system, the procedure for registration of births and deaths was also modified to some etent and the forms

    redesigned. (ost of the tables to be part of the Annual Report of the hief Registrars based on registration

    of births and deaths data under re&amped system would be based on the information of place of usual

    residence of mother in case of births and place of usual residence of the deceased in case of deaths. he

    re&amped system became operational in 2 in all 8tates/7nion erritories ecept Assam, Arunachal

    )radesh, @uHarat, #aryana, #imachal )radesh,

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    17/100

    S*+*#)*#7+' R!4%"*)

    1.9 8ystem of Registration of Births and Deaths is constantly generating statistical information at the

    local le&el. he information contained in the Reporting %orms is consolidated for onward transmission to

    the hief Registrar of a 8tate/7. 4&ery hief Registrar is re-uired to submit an Annual Report on the

    5or0ing of the Act and a 8tatistical Report to the 8tate @o&ernment by the ?uly and December respecti&ely

    of the following year to which the report relates. he hief Registrars are also re-uired to send a copy ofthese Reports to the Registrar @eneral, India, @o&t. of India.

    1.1 Based on the Annual 8tatistical Report prepared by the 8tates, the

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    18/100

    CHAPTER II

    I4%"*+* %)!"+*#%) % W%"

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    19/100

    total birth registered at the &arious mission during 29, uwait alone accounted for more than ""L births

    and Matar accounted for 19L births. In case of total registered death for 29 at &arious missions, uwait

    and Matar accounted for !'L and 21L deaths respecti&ely.

    ?. A5+' "!4%"* % *! $%"

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    20/100

    N+! %& S*+*!) UT) Y!+" P!+'*#!) #4%)!3 %

    1. R++)*+ 2009 "9 @ram 8e&a0 :Registrar of

    Births and Deaths;

    1 De&. a0shadweep and )uducherry ha&e furnished the nil information in respect of imposing penalty. he other

    8tates has not gi&en any input on this issue in the Act Report.

    8. T"+##( %& C##' R!(#)*"+*#% F57*#%+"#!)- he registration functionaries in&ol&ed in R8 wor0 at

    &arious le&els are from different departments in most of the 8tates/7s. Almost all these functionaries

    perform registration wor0 as an additional wor0 along with their other wor0 assigned to them by the

    respecti&e department. %urther, due to fre-uent transfers of i&il Registration %unctionaries, there is a

    need to impart training at a regular inter&al to these officials on registration rules, procedures and practices

    framed under the pro&isions of the RBD Act and the corresponding 8tate rules.he details of raining

    programme organiGed in 8tates /7s for the registration functionaries are summariGed below=

    N+! %& S*+*! N5!" %& T"+##(

    P"%("+!)

    N%. %& P+"*#7#4+*)

    1. hhattisgarh 1"" 1"9"

    2. #aryana 1 3ot gi&en

    !. arnata0a 1!1 3ot gi&en

    ". (adhya )radesh !!2 !+,"9

    $. (iGoram 9 3ot gi&en

    . RaHasthan $$ 3ot gi&en'. )unHab 3ot gi&en 1$9

    During 29*1, the financial assistance of Rs. $ >a0h was gi&en by the

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    21/100

    CHAPTER III

    A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF DATA ON REGISTERED

    BIRTHS, DEATHS AND INFANT DEATHS

    2.1. Births and deaths are the two most important &ital e&ents in the life of an indi&idual and for the

    society as a whole. Based on the data collected under the i&il Registration 8ystem on registered births and

    deaths, this hapter presents the trend in the le&el of registration, &ital rates and other related indicators,

    at the 8tate and 3ational le&el. o get an idea as to the co&erage of i&il Registration in the country, the

    data generated from the i&il Registration 8ystem has been compared with corresponding estimates

    thrown up by the 8ample Registration 8ystem.#owe&er, while interpreting the two statistics it should be

    borne in mind that data under i&il Registration is based on place of occurrence and8ample Registration is

    by the place of usual residence of mother. It will not be out of place to mention that although the

    registration data continues to be deficient due to not reportingof the e&ents for registration or not being

    registered, andalso due to non*reporting of the registered e&ents to the Districts RegistrarKs office in time

    by the local registration units, the sil&er lining is that the o&erall le&el of registration across the 8tates /

    7nion erritories :7s; largely show an upward trend.

    2.2 8tatement 1 gi&es the number of registration units along with the le&el of reporting at the national

    le&el and across the 8tates and 7nion erritories by rural and urban place of occurrence of the e&ent in

    29. >e&el of reporting indicates how many registration units from those within a 8tate / 7 submitted

    monthly returns of registered births and deaths to the District RegistrarKs

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    22/100

    S*+*!!* 1 N5!" %& "!(#)*"+*#% 5#*) +3 '!!' %& "!4%"*#( 4'+7!, I3#+, S*+*!) +3 UT), 2009

    S'.

    N%.

    I3#+ S*+*! UT R!(#)*"+*#% 5#*) /N5!" L!!' %& "!4%"*#( /

    otal Rural 7rban otal Rural 7rban

    India 2+9! 2"$' "+9 +1. +. +.

    S*+*!)1 Andhra )radesh 21'9$ 21' 12$ '1.9 '1.+ 9$.'

    2 Arunachal )radesh 19 n.a. n.a. "!.' n.a. n.a.

    ! Assam 1 $"+ 2 9'.2 9.+ 1.

    " Bihar 9111 +91$ 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.

    $ hhattisgarh 99!$ 9''$ 1 '$. '$." 9.1

    @oa 2! 1+9 1" 1. 1. 1.

    ' @uHarat 1+29$ 1+1!1 1" 1. 1. 1.

    + #aryana $9 "2$ +" 1. 1. 1.

    9 #imachal )radesh !299 !2"! $ 1. 1. 1.

    1 ?ammu 6 ashmir 299 219 + $2.! $".1 1.

    11 ?har0hand "'" "$9" + n.a. n.a. n.a.12 arnata0a 2+21 2'9$! !+ 9$.1 9$. 1.

    1! erala 1$+ 999 $9 1. 1. 1.

    1" (adhya )radesh 2"$$ 2!+" '" 9$.2 99. 9$.!

    1$ (aharashtra "221 "1'$" 2' 9.+ 9.' 9+.9

    1 (anipur ++ $ !2 "." $1.$ !'.$

    1' (eghalaya 1"9 1"1 + 9+. 9'.9 1.

    1+ (iGoram '!2 $ 1'2 92. 91.+ 9$.!

    19 3agaland 11$$ 1129 2 $+.' $+.! +.2

    2 a0shadweep 9 9 * 1. 1. *

    !$ )uducherry !' 21 1 1. 1. 1.

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    23/100

    2.. 8tatement 2 presents o&erall number of registered births and deaths at the national le&el for the

    years 19+1 to 29.

    S*+*!!* 2 N5!" %& "!(#)*!"!3 #"*) +3 3!+*) +* *! +*#%+' '!!', 191 2009

    Notes:

    1. The figures are based on the data made available by the States/UTs.2. For the period 191 to 2!!!" total registered births/deaths of States/Union Territories e#$lude data for %ssam from 191 to

    19& ' 199! to 199(" for )ihar from 199& to 1999" for *erala of 19+" for ,eghalaya from 19( to 199(" for Si--im from

    192 to 19& and of 199" for Uttar radesh of 19+ and from 199 to 2!!!" for Uttara-hand of 2!!!" for 0est )engal of

    192 ' 19" for %'N slands 191 to 192" from 19& to 19 and from 1991 to 1992 and for 3a-shad4eep of 192.

    +. n 2!!1" total registered births/deaths of States/Union Territories e#$lude data from %ssam" Uttar radesh and Uttara-hand.(. Total registered births and deaths of States/Union Territories does not in$lude data for Uttara-hand from 2!!2 to 2!!+"

    Tripura for 2!! and2!!&52!!9.

    $. The registered births/deaths have been ta-en from the %nnual 6eports of the 7hief 6egistrars and in its absen$e from the

    data provided by the 7hief 6egistrar8s offi$e.

    2.'. 8tatement 2 re&eals that there is an absolute increase in the number of registered births and

    deaths o&er the period 19+1 * 29. he number of registered births has gone up from +.$ million in 19+1

    to 21.29 million in 29 * an increase of 1"+L. 8uch increase in the number of registered deaths, from 2.'1million in 19+1 to $.+ million in 29, is to the tune of 11L. #owe&er, disaggregated to re&eal year to

    year change in the registered births and death, the pattern does not re&eal a continuous increasing trend.

    5hereas, siGable decline in the number of registered births and deaths between two consecuti&e years is

    largely due to incomplete reporting by the local registration units of all registered e&ents to the Districts

    RegistrarKs office, such increase may be due to special registration campaigns underta0en by the 8tates /

    7s. he decline in absolute number of registered deaths at the national le&el from $.+ million in 2'

    to $." million in 2+, was due to incomplete reporting from some of the maHor 8tates namely, Andhra

    Y!+" L#! B#"*) D!+*)

    191 +$$! 2'+9$'

    192 +!+""! 2$!''"1

    19= '+$1' 2"!1121

    19? +$291 2!"+$+

    19@ +'192 2111!9

    196 9'''"$ 2+1+!+

    198 12'!++ 29$1"!

    19 1+9$'"' !219"2

    199 11'"9! !1"9!12

    1990 111"" !1""2!

    1991 11919! !"29

    1992 12!2"'9 !$'""9

    199= 12$191+2 !'"++1

    199? 12'++1 !'!$!

    Y!+" L#! B#"*) D!+*)

    199@ 1!'2$99! !'+""9

    1996 11'11"! !""$!9$

    1998 11'"$'19 !2!1!!!

    199 11+9!9" !'1112

    1999 122+''"+ !2!'9

    2000 129"+2! !'+9"

    2001 1299!$'' !91''

    2002 1$"$!2 ""!1

    200= 1$2921 "$92

    200? 1$'''12 ""+'++

    200@ 1!9"2$ "2'2'

    2006 1+12129$ $29+2'9

    2008 19"9'$ $+"922

    200 1999!'99 $!+1!1

    2009 21292$'" $'''$

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    24/100

    )radesh, Bihar, hhattisgarh, ?ammu 6 ashmir and 7ttar )radesh.hart 1 and 2 present the number of

    registered births and deaths from 19+1 to 29.

    2.+. he number of registered births, deaths and infant deaths for 8tates and 7nion erritories for the

    period from 2*29 are presented in 8tatement !, " and $ respecti&ely.

    .

    +.

    1.

    12.

    1".

    1.

    1+.

    2.

    22.

    19+1

    19+2

    19+!

    19+"

    19+$

    19+

    19+'

    19++

    19+9

    199

    1991

    1992

    199!

    199"

    199$

    199

    199'

    199+

    1999

    2

    21

    22

    2!

    2"

    2$

    2

    2'

    2+

    29

    N5!"%&R!(#)*!"!3L#!B#"*)/#,'+

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    25/100

    Statement 3: Number of registered births by States/ Union Territories, 2000-2009

    S'.

    N%.

    I3#+ S*+*!

    U#% T!""#*%"

    N5!" %& "!(#)*!"!3 #"*)

    2000 2001 2002 200= 200? 200@ 2006 2008 200 200

    I3#+ 129?6910 1299=@88 1@6?@6=2 1@290261 1@888612 16=9?62@ 112129@ 19?698@6 1999=899 21292@8

    S*+*!)

    1 Andhra )radesh 9!!'1' ++12$ 9+$99 91!' 9$229 9!!"9+ 112"2+ 11+"$$$ 11'911" 11"9"

    2 Arunachal )radesh 2!9+ 2"$1 !!11 2'"1 2292 199'" 29"!' 29" !!91 !+2

    = Assam 2'$1+! !2!21 !9"" "21$11 "'"'!' $$9 $2+$$9 $""!21 $$"99' $+2

    ? Bihar 1191 12$2 119'2+ 1$2$ !'1+1 "'" $$!99+ '1!"!! +$+9! 122!$

    @ hhattisgarh !"!929 !""2 !!$+ !221"! !!!" !+"+1$ !91+" !+12"' 2+$++ !11$

    6 @oa 2!191 2+' 21+ 2"'$' 2"+9 2"!1 229'1 22!9 22$'' 21"9

    8 @uHarat 111$2" 19+2$2 1++22$ 19'119 12!19$ 11$"+ 12$"29! 12122 1!1$9'+ 1!"$+

    #aryana "211 "1' "219" "!"+$2 "'$!1 "'19+ $+9' $119'! $!$21 $!+91

    9 #imachal )radesh 12$1$ 1!! 1!11$' 1!!2 1!'"'! 1!"" 1"!29 1!!1$' 1!$$'$ 1!'!2

    10 ?ammu 6 ashmir 1!29"1 11$2$$ 12!'$ 12!++! 12+29 1!2!$ 1!'"' 1!9'9$ 1""912 1""1

    11 ?har0hand 1!!" 1!"1 1"$"2 1'9" 21$""2 2$$!2$ 2+$$2 !"9'9 "9!' "$

    12 arnata0a 19'1 11'22" 9'!$! 11'"9 9++$2 1'++ 1"$!1 1""2" 1+2"$ 1'!+

    1= erala $9!'2" $'9! $'2+"' $"9'19 $$+9!! $$$122 $$!2 $"$1$" $!$'!+ $""!"

    1? (adhya )radesh '$911' '1$+$" '!2!$ '+99+$ 9+1'2! 12'91 129! 1"12!"" 1!2"2 11+!'

    1@ (aharashtra 1+2+2' 1+2$1"$ 1+"+$9 1+!$+$ 1+++9! 19"!"" 1'1'$'1 1''1!+ 19!2+1 19'"9

    16 (anipur 21"$ 19$ 21"1$ 22' 2!'"1 2"2!1 2"+$1 2"!1 2$!2 2'2

    18 (eghalaya "9$ !"!$" !2"9! "!$21 !9!$ '!9 ++2+ 21+! $+!' '+12

    1 (iGoram 1++$ 19'! 2!11 2!1 2222 21!! 221"1 22+!+ 2!29" 2$$!

    19 3agaland !+$ "1!$9 "2'2$ "191' "$129 "'2'9 "'2' "22"' "91!! 4267

    20

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    26/100

    Statement 4: Number of registered deaths by States/ Union Territories, 2000-2009

    S'.

    N%.

    I3#+S*+*!U#%

    T!""#*%"

    N5!" %& "!(#)*!"!3 3!+*)

    2000 2001 2002 200= 200? 200@ 2006 2008 200 200

    I3#+ =892==1 =961868 ??=6100 ?@69026 ??86 ?602828 @29289 @0?922 @6=1=1 @68880

    S*+*!)

    1 Andhra )radesh !$99 !$91$ !9!!1 !'"'9 !'$$21 !$"21 "!+ "2'9+ "12$1 "!"

    2 Arunachal )radesh 1"9' 1'92 1!9' 12' 1$2 1!" 1"$ 19 1$9+ 1$+

    = Assam $9$9 $+$! 9!2 '+2 '22$ +'" 91+$+ ''"$+ +211 991

    ? Bihar '$ '$'2" +'!! 92'' 129+9 1$''91 1'2'+9 1'" 1+1!! 1!'+

    @ hhattisgarh 1!11!! 122!!2 1!"9" 1!!''$ 12+!'' 1"11$ 1"92 1$11" 1'1' 192!

    6 @oa 9+91 1"!' 11+ 19"9 111" 11!'! 119+ 119 11$1$ 11$1

    8 @uHarat 22$$ 2$1' 2!291 2$'$1" 2'"$ 2$199 29''+' !$'$2 !1199 !1'9+

    #aryana 1122+$ 11"1! 11"1 12'11 12!+! 112"'+ 12!$1 1!!$+1 1"!929 1"1+

    9 #imachal )radesh !221! !"9+ !$'9 !'"$! !!+ !'$9 "!!' !991$ "2!+ "2!9

    10 ?ammu 6 ashmir !!'9 2$"9 2+2 29'+ !12' !1' !1'$ !""+9 !$2$ !$99

    11 ?har0hand $""$+ $" "19 '!!"" +!9+' 9"$9' 9+'"! 1$9 9'9+ 1'9"

    12 arnata0a !$1'! !$1+1 !$$2 !$91 !"!"" !""1$ !+'" !+1+9 !'22 !'!29

    1= erala 1'+'9$ 1+2$9 1+"$9' 19"2" 1991' 2"1$' 2199" 2!+91 221'9 2!22

    1? (adhya )radesh 29$+ 29!92' !!+2 !2"" !+22$ !1299 !!99"! !!922 !"'+! !22!!

    1@ (aharashtra $12!! $2+++ $"11" 2'11 "9++' $"!$2 $+11 !112 29'' !!2

    16 (anipur !!2' 2++ ""19 !$' "1+2 "'9 "19$ "9'$ !!2! "29

    18 (eghalaya 1''2 +9! '2"" '!22 1122' 9'9 12'"' 112!$ 1+$ 1"+"

    1 (iGoram !$$ "' ""1 "9' "1 "+ "9' "9' $$+' $9"

    19 3agaland $2" $1" 199 $"2! "9 !"9 '2!9 2" '!"' "

    20 a0shadweep !' 2+" !21 !$! !2' !1! !9 !"' !' !1

    8 )uducherry +$'9 9119 9"19 9"9 9+ 1191 11$9 1" 11$19 11+

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    27/100

    Statement 5: Number of registeredinfant deaths by States/ Union Territories, 2000-2009

    S'.

    N%.

    I3#+ S*+*!) U#%

    T!""#*%"

    N5!" %& "!(#)*!"!3 #&+* 3!+*)

    2000 2001 2002 200= 200? 200@ 2006 2008 200 200

    I3#+ 16?0= 1@?@? 16==28 16@029 1@211= 1@92=0 1===== 1@2?60 18@208 106

    S*+*!)

    1 Andhra )radesh $9'' $"'2 22 '! $+" $!" !9'+ $9 '"1+ 12$

    2 Arunachal )radesh 1'! 1 29 9 1 1' " 1+

    = Assam n.a. "! !9 ! 2" 21 n.a. !1$ 1!! 2!1

    ? Bihar ''" 9+ 91' 1+$+ 21! n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. +"+

    @ hhatisgarh "" $$ $$"2 +"9! '$2$ !!$ !+ "!1' 191" 1+$

    6 @oa 2+9 2$ 2+! 2+9 !29 !2 2!" 21+ 291 !!

    8 @uHarat '12+ +9'1 +11' +$'9 +12 1129" 9$' 9"' +!1 9$'

    #aryana "2+9 !'9! "1" "!" "2'9 "12$ "'" $"" $' $!2

    9 #imachal )radesh 1$'' 1$19 1"9+ 1""1 12 1!" 1"$1 11' 11$+ 12

    10 ?ammu 6 ashmir 2$!' 19 1+$ 1++! 1'"! 1'$+ 1'92 1'99 1'2+ 1''

    11 ?har0hand n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a

    12 arnata0a '!2 '+21 9++ 1! 9'' 99 1!" 11'2 12+'$ 1!!9

    1= erala "21 !1"' !22! 2"$9 2!91 "19 "$+ "22 " !'2

    1? (adhya )radesh 1'2 1$+!9 19$9 1! 19'+ 1$+9" 1"!99 1+" 1$! 11'

    1@ (aharashtra 2''+ 2!+ 2$"! 2$$'9 2"'" 22!'9 n.a. 1$!2+ 211"" 2!$$

    16 (anipur 22' 21 2$' 1!$ 1'2 1++ 22 !9+ 1+" 22

    18 (eghalaya 2!$1 1'' 1"1 +$ +"" 12" 21' 1'+9 1+'' 2$

    1 (iGoram 21' !"2 "! 2+$ "$' """ "'' +1 +9 9'

    19 3agaland 2" 1"" 1! 1 11$ 19 122 9+ + '

    20 a0shadweep 2+ 2$ 2+ 2" 19 ' 2 1$ 1 1

    8 )uducherry 11 12$$ 11'' 12"! 119! 1+' 1!1 1'2 1!'$ 1'

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    28/100

    2.9. S!:-$#)! D#)*"#5*#% %& R!(#)*!"!3 V#*+' E!*)

    hart !on se wise distribution of registered births re&ealthat share of female registered births is

    about per cent short of registered male births. he figures eclude7ttar )radesh due to non*receipt of

    information on gender wise registered births during 29.

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    29/100

    D#)*"#5*#% %& "!(#)*!"!3 #"*1) +3 3!+*1) #)-+-#)!)*#+*!3 #"*1) +3 3!+*1)

    &%" *1! 4!"#%3 2000-2009

    he time series data on registered births and deaths for the years 2 to 29 re&eals a significant

    long*term growth in the area co&ered by the registered e&ents as compared to estimated e&ents. In case of

    death registration, this share has been reduced during 2+*29 as compared to 2' due to less

    reporting of registered death e&ents from some of the maHor 8tates. Birth registration has crossed the le&el

    of + percent during 29 which is good indication for the system of i&il Registration.

    .

    $.

    1.

    1$.

    2.

    2$.

    !.

    !$.

    ".

    N5!"%&R!(#)*!"!3

    D!+*)/#,E000

    C+"* 6 S!:-$#)! R!(#)*!"!3 D!+*) %& M+%" S*+*!), 2009

    (ale %emale

    1.

    12.

    1".

    1.

    1+.

    2.

    22.

    2".

    2.

    2+.

    2 21 22 2! 2" 2$ 2 2' 2+ 29

    4stimat

    edandRegisteredBirths:in>a0hs; C+"* 8 E)*#+*!3 +3 R!(#)*!"!3 B#"*), 2000-2009

    4stimated Births Registered Births

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    30/100

    D#)*"#5*#% %& !)*#+*!3 +3 "!(#)*!"!3 !!*) # M+%" S*+*!)

    In the analysis, the 8tates ha&ing population less than one million ha&e not been ta0en into consideration .

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    31/100

    M!3#7+' +**!*#% "!7!#!3 +* *1! *#! %& #"*1 +3 3!+*1

    he data on li&e birth by type of medical attention recei&ed at the time of deli&ery has been

    reported from 21 8tates/7s and the combined distribution of medical attention recei&ed at the time of

    birth of these 8tates/7s has been presented in hart 11. hart 11 shows that maHority of li&e births ha&e

    been occurred in an institution, either in @o&ernment or pri&ate hospitals. Institutional births occurred in

    $Lof cases and ""L of registered births were noninstitutional in the year 29.

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    32/100

    I&+* D!+*)

    8tatement presents the infant deaths registered by place of occurrence :Rural /7rban; of the

    e&ent for the year 29 and it may be obser&ed that share of rural area is only !+.2L and urban area is

    1.+L in total infant deaths registered. he registration of infant deaths in rural area is a cause of concern.2

    8tates namely ?har0hand and ripura ha&e not submitted the returns on registered infant deaths for the

    year 29. herefore, the analysis is based on the figures of !! 8tates/7s only.8hare of infant deaths to

    total registered deaths is more in urban area as compared to rural area.8tatement ' gi&es thepercentage

    distribution of se wise infant deathswhich shows that female infants eperienced higher mortality than

    male infants.

    S*+*!!* 6 P!"7!*+(! 3#)*"#5*#% %& "!(#)*!"!3 #&+* 3!+*) 4'+7! %& %775""!7!, 2009

    )lace of

    occurrence

    3o. of

    Registered

    Deaths

    3o. of

    Registered

    Infant Deaths

    L share of registered of

    Infant Deaths by place of

    occurrence

    L of Registered Infant deaths

    to total registered deaths

    R5"+' !"$$$ 92 !+.! 2.

    U"+ 2221$ 111$9 1.' $.

    T%*+' $'''$ 1++$ 1. !.2

    S*+*!!* 8 P!"7!*+(! 3#)*"#5*#% %& #&+* 3!+*) )!:, 2009

    8e 3o. of Registered Deaths 3o. of Registered Infant

    Deaths

    L of Infant deaths to total

    registered deaths

    M+'! 2'19$$ +"9! !.1

    F!+'! 2"'1 '2929 !.

    P!")%; $'''$ 1++$ !.2N= Includes the cases of se not reported, so does not match with the addition of male and female.

    =. A+')#) +3 F#3#()

    =.1. L!!' %& R!(#)*"+*#% /LOR

    !.1.1. he le&el of registration, defined as the percentage of registered births/deaths to the births/deaths

    estimated through 8R8, determines the performance le&el of a 8tate / 7nion territory. In the absence of

    reliable estimates of number of births and deaths on a year to year basis from any other source, the

    number of e&ents as re&ealed from 8R8 is used to calculate the le&el of registration. he le&el of

    registration so calculated is &ery high for some of the smaller 8tates/7nion erritories either due to the

    lower estimates of &ital e&ents than the actual and / or due to the fact that 8R8 estimates of &ital e&ents are

    based on the place of usual residence while e&ents are registered at the place of occurrence irrespecti&e of

    the place of residence.

    !.1.2. In the absence of number of registered e&ents of ripura, the same for the year 2 has been

    used for the calculation of le&el of registration for the year 29. his has been done to ensure that the

    le&el of registration for the country as a whole for the year 29 is not de&oid of le&el of registration for

    this 8tate.

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    33/100

    !.1.!. he le&els of registration of births and deaths for India and 8tates/7s for the period 2 to 29

    are presented in 8tatements + and 9 respecti&ely. he le&el of registration of births has increased to +1.!

    percent in 29from '." percent in 2+. he le&el of registration of deaths has also increased to .9

    percent in 29from ." percent during the corresponding period. hart 1!depicts the trend of le&el of

    registration of births and deaths from 2 to 29. he le&el of registration for births has recorded sharp

    eponential increase after 2$. #owe&er, the eisting gap of about 19 percentin case of registration of

    births and about !! percent for registration of deaths at all India le&el remains a cause of concern. In orderto uni&ersaliGe the registration of e&ents, a mission mode approach is re-uired particularly in the poor

    performing 8tates.

    $.2

    $+.$9.$

    $'.'

    ."

    2.$

    9.

    '".$

    '."

    +1.!

    "+.'

    $2.2 $2.1$!.$

    $$.2 $$.

    !.2

    9.!

    ." .9

    "$.

    $.

    $$.

    .

    $.

    '.

    '$.

    +.

    +$.

    2 21 22 2! 2" 2$ 2 2' 2+ 29

    L!!'%&R!(#)*"+*#%,/#,

    Y!+"

    C+"* 1= L!!' %& R!(#)*"+*#% %& B#"*) +3 D!+*), 2000-2009

    >

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    34/100

    S*+*!!* L!!' %& R!(#)*"+*#% %& B#"*), 2000-2009

    S'. N%. I3#+ S*+*!) UT) 2000 2001 2002 200= 200? 200@ 2006 2008 200 2009

    I3#+ @6.2 @.0 @9.@ @8.8 60.? 62.@ 69.0 8?.@ 86.? 1.=

    S*+*!)

    1. Andhra )radesh $+.1 $$.! 1.$ $'.1 !.2 1. '!." ''." ''.$ '.!2. Arunachal )radesh +".+ 1. 1. 1. 9".! '!.9 1. 1. 1. 1.

    !. Assam !+.' "".' $1. $+. '.$ '1.2 '". '.+ '+.$ +2.1

    ". Bihar !.' !.9 ". $.9 11.$ 1.9 2.! 2.2 !1. "$.

    $. hhattisgarh 2.! $$." 2.9 $9. $$.2 !.! ".1 2." ".+ "9."

    . @oa 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 9'.9 1. 9$.

    '. @uHarat ++.+ +.2 +$. +". 9".9 +9.$ 9. 9'.+ 1. 1.

    +. #aryana '." '!.2 '!.' '". +!. +".! 9.+ 91. 9$.9 9.

    9. #imachal )radesh 9".1 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.

    1. ?ammu 6 ashmir +.1 $.2 .$ !.! ".! ".+ .$ . +.2 +.'

    11. ?har0hand 19. 1+.9 19.9 2".! 2+.+ !2.9 !'. "".' $2.! $1.

    12. arnata0a +'.9 +.$ +1.9 +".! +$.+ +'. 92.2 92. 9". 9".$

    1!. erala 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.

    1". (adhya )radesh ". !+. !+.9 "1." $1.1 $!.! $.2 '2.9 +".! +!.1

    1$. (aharashtra 91.1 9. 92.+ 9!.1 +. +$.9 ++.1 91.$ 1. 1.

    1. (anipur ".9 "". $'.+ $.$ '$.$ '2. +. ''.2 '.' '2.2

    1'. (eghalaya '2.2 $2.2 $!." '!.+ ". 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.

    1+. (iGoram 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.

    19. 3agaland n.c. n.c. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.

    2.

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    35/100

    !.1.". 8tatement + re&eals that the 8tates/7s continue to function at different le&els of registration

    efficiency during 2*29. he le&el of registration of births in the country is highly erratice&en after

    more than " years of enactment of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 199. he 8tates/7s of

    Arunachal )radesh, @uHarat, #imachal )radesh, erala, (aharashtra, (eghalaya, (iGoram, 3agaland,

    )unHab, handigarh, Delhi and )uducherry ha&e recorded cent percent registration of births in 29.

    !.1.$ ripura, for which the figures of 2 on registered birth ha&e been used for calculating >a0shadweep

    ?ammu6,ashmir

    7ttara0hand

    (anipur

    7ttar)radesh

    An

    dhra)radesh

    A63Islands

    (a

    dhya)radesh

    I3DIA

    Assam

    D63#a&eli

    8i00im

    e&elofRegistrationofBirths:inL; C+"* 1? L!!' %& R!(#)*"+*#% %& B#"*) %& S*+*!)UT), 2009

    66

    .9

    2.

    ".

    .

    +.

    1.

    Bihar

    ArunachalO

    (anipur

    Assam

    7ttara0hand

    ?har0hand

    (adhya)radesh

    7ttar)radesh

    ?ammu6,ashmir

    hhattisgarh

    5estBengal

    I3DIA

    Andhra)radesh

    (eghalaya

    >a0shadweep

    D63#a&eli

    RaHasthan

    Daman6Diu

    @uHarat

    a0shadweep followed by (anipur has recorded the lowest birth

    rate during the year among all 8tates/7s.

    =.@. C"53! D!+*1 R+*!)

    !.$.1. rudedeath rate is the mortality epressed as a proportion of the population.he crude death

    rate is defined as the ratio of the number of deaths during the year to the midyear population in that

    yearF the &alue is epressed per thousand population.

    !.$.2. rude Death Rate :DR; based on R8 data iscompared with the DR estimated from 8R8 to

    e&aluate the completeness of i&il Registration 8ystem despite the difference in method of data

    collection. he death data in R8 is based on the place of occurrence of e&ent whereas in 8R8, it is based

    on the place of usual residence of the deceased. A comparati&e picture of DRs based on R8 and 8R8

    has been depicted in the hart2!.

    $.

    1.

    1$.

    2.

    2$.

    !.

    !$.

    ".

    12.+ 1

    ".9

    1$.9

    1$.9 1

    +.

    1.=

    1+."

    1+."

    19.

    19.!

    2.1

    2.$

    21.+

    2!.! 2

    $.1

    2$.!

    2$.9

    !."

    !.9

    rudeBirthRate

    C+"* 22 S*+*!$#)! C"53! B#"* R+*!, 2009

    =.8

    =.9 ?

    .2?.=

    ?.1

    ?.2 ?

    .8 @.1

    ?.9

    ?.9

    .@

    .?

    .1

    .0

    8.@ 8

    .68.@

    8.?

    8.?

    8.=

    !.

    $.

    '.

    9.

    2 21 22 2! 2" 2$ 2 2' 2+ 29

    C"53!D!+*R

    +*!

    Y!+"

    C+"* 2= C"53! D!+* R+*! +)!3 % CRS +3 SRS, 2000-2009

    R8 8R8

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    43/100

    !.$.2. It may be seen from hart2! that gap between death rates based on R8 and 8R8 during

    29has narrows down which is a good indication of impro&ement in the functioning of R8. he

    situation further impro&es if death rates based on R8 and 8R8 for the better performing 8tates

    recording more than +$ per cent le&el of registration of deaths are compared. o illustrate this, such a

    comparison has been done for few 8tates as shown in hart2" for 29. It may be seen that the death

    rates are in close proimity in these 8tates.

    !.$.!. he crude death rates for the year 29for India and 8tates/7s where le&el of registration of

    birth is more than +Lare presented in hart 2$. Among these 8tates/78, handigarh has reported the

    highest DR during the year. his may due to the fact that substantial number of deaths may be

    occurring to outsiders who &isit these places to a&ail better medical facilities. Arunachal )radesh has

    reported the lowest DR during the year 29 among all 8tates/7s and among the maHor 8tates, Bihar

    has recorded the lowest DR for the year under reference which is due to poor netting of e&ents.

    !.$.". 8tatement 11 presents the comparati&e picture of crude birth anddeath rates based on the data

    from R8 and 8R8 of the 8tates/7s for year 29. It may be seen from the 8tatement 11 that the birth

    and death rate for the country as a whole based on R8 data is about "per cent and 2 per cent higher

    than that of corresponding rates based on 8R8 data. In &iew of the gap of about 19 per cent in

    registration of births and about !! per cent in registration of deaths at 3ational le&el, the rates deri&ed

    @.8 @.6.?

    6.8 6. 6.6.6 6.88.2

    8.6

    6. 8.0

    ".

    $.

    .

    '.

    +.

    #aryana (aharashtra arnata0a amil 3adu erala )unHab

    C"53!D!+*R+*!

    S*+*!)

    C+"* 2? C"53! D!+* R+*! +)!3 % CRS +3 SRS %& !**!" 4!"&%"#( +%" S*+*!)

    R8 8R8

    .

    2.

    ".

    .

    +.

    1.

    12.

    2.9

    ".

    ?.9 $

    .2 $.$ $

    .'$.+

    . .!

    ."

    ."

    .' .+

    .+ '

    .1 '.1

    9.1

    11.!

    rudeDeathRate

    C+"* 2@ S*+*!$#)! C"53! D!+* R+*!, 2009

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    44/100

    from R8 data is not comparable with the rates based on 8R8 data for the country as a whole.

    #owe&er,it can be obser&ed in the 8tates, where the le&el of registration of &ital e&ents is -uite good

    during 29, the crude birth rates based on registered e&ents are close to the respecti&e estimates

    based on 8R8 in respect of the 8tates of @oa, @uHarat, #aryana, arnata0a, erala, (aharashtraand

    amil 3adu. here are significant differences in maHority of the 8tates in the death rates based on R8

    and 8R8 which is due to low le&el of registration of deaths.

    S*+*!!* 11 C"53! B#"* D!+* R+*!) +)!3 % CRS SRS +3 LOR- S*+*!)U#% T!""#*%"#!), 2009

    S'. N%. I3#+S*+*!)U#%

    T!""#*%"#!)

    CBR LOR CDR LOR

    CRS SRS CRS SRS

    S*+*!)

    1 Andhra )radesh 1". 1+.! '.! $.2 '. +."

    2 Arunachal )radesh 2$.! 21.1 1. 1.! .1 21.!

    ! Assam 19." 2!. +2.1 !.! +." !9."

    " Bihar 12.+ 2+.$ "$. 1." '. 2.

    $ hhattisgarh 12.' 2$.' "9." ". +.1 $.9

    @oa 12.+ 1!.$ 9$. .9 .' 1.

    ' @uHarat 2!.! 22.! 1. $.$ .9 '9.9

    + #aryana 21.+ 22.' 9. $.' . +.+

    9 #imachal )radesh 2.$ 1'.2 1. .! '.2 ++.1

    1 ?ammu 6 ashmir 12.+ 1+. +.' !.1 $.' $$.1

    11 ?har0hand 1!.2 2$. $1. !.$ '. $.1

    12 arnata0a 1+." 19.$ 9".$ ." '.2 ++.+

    1! erala 1$.9 1".' 1. .+ .+ 99.9

    1" (adhya )radesh 2!. 2'.' +!.1 ". +.$ $".

    1$ (aharashtra 1+. 1'. 1. $.+ .' +$.9

    1 (anipur 11.1 1$." '2.2 1.+ ".' !+.1

    1' (eghalaya !." 2"." 1. $.+ +.1 '1.!

    1+ (iGoram 2$.9 1'. 1. . ".$ 1.

    19 3agaland 19.! 1'.2 1. 2.9 !. +1."

    2

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    45/100

    !.$.$. his suggests that in the 8tates where >

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    46/100

    =.8. S!: R+*#% +* B#"*

    !.'.1. he 8e Ratio :3umber of females per thousand males; at birth is an important indicator to map

    the se differential of the population at the beginning of their life. he se ratio at birth has been

    calculated for different 8tates/7s for the year 2 to 29 and shown in the 8tatement12.

    S*+*!!* 12 S!: R+*#% +* B#"* +)!3 % "!(#)*!"!3 !!*), 2000-2009

    S'.

    N%.

    I3#+ S*+*! U#%

    T!""#*%"2000 2001 2002 200= 200? 200@ 2006 2008 200 2009

    I3#+ 6 8@ 82 6 82 86 91 90= 90? 9

    S*+*!)

    1 Andhra )radesh 9! 9!" 9! 9'! 9'2 9+' 9'! 9'" 9+ 9+$

    2 Arunachal )radesh '2+ ++' + +12 +" '99 '92 +$" +'$ +

    = Assam n.a. n.a. n.a. '$ n.a. '!2 +' +!" +$! 9!1

    ? Bihar n.a. 9+" ''9 +2 +1 '9! n.a. n.a. n.a. '1$

    @ hhattisgarh 9!! 92$ 92 92 919 9!9 919 919 ++ 92"

    6 @oa 91+ 919 929 9!1 9!1 9!1 9! 9"' 9!1 921

    8 @uHarat +1 +2 +2 +!$ +2" +" 9'2 +'9 ++! 9$

    #aryana '92 '+9 +29 +1" '9 +2' +$' + +$" +$!

    9 #imachal )radesh +$' +$ + +'' +'2 + ++$ 9! 9" 922

    10 ?ammu 6 ashmir +'9 91 92! 92$ 9!" 92! 9 922 9 91+

    11 ?har0hand n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. +" +! +!$ +$ +'+ +"

    12 arnata0a 9$$ 9'1 9$ 92" +$+ 9"! 9$2 1" 1"' 111

    1= erala 99+ 9+ 9"" 9$1 9" 9"9 9$$ 9"" 9$2 9"2

    1? (adhya )radesh +9 +"1 +2! +"1 +" +$$ +$$ 9$ 91! 9!+

    1@ (aharashtra +"' +19 +2 ++ +11 n.a. n.a. n.a. +' ++

    16 (anipur 91" '$! 9"9 92! 1" 111 9! 91! 9$ 9!"

    18 (eghalaya 9!" 9"2 9' +'$ 111 91+ 9$ +" 9$9 9"+

    1 (iGoram 911 92' 91! 92 9"$ 9" 9$2 9!+ 9"2 9"9

    19 3agaland +2 +9" 9+ 9'1 9'' 9+ +" +2! +2 ++!

    20

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    47/100

    !.'.2. It can be seen from the statement 11 that the 8e Ratio at Birth based on registered e&ents of

    arnata0a has shown the highest and Bihar has shown the lowest during 29. he se ratio at birth at

    national le&el is +9!.he 8e Ratio at birth for the country ranges from ++ to 9"o&er these years. A

    downfall in the se ratio at birth has been obser&ed during 29 which is due to less reporting of female

    registered births from the 8tates of Bihar, ?har0hand and

  • 8/13/2019 CRS Report 2009

    48/100

    Male Female Person Male Female Person Male Female Person

    India 3888603 3487495 10630506 5165918 4638895 10660089 9054521 8126390 21292574

    States

    Andhra Pradesh 228826 229273 458099 357915 348928 706843 586741 578201 1164942

    Arunachal Pradesh 4899 3847 8746 12169 9913 22082 17068 13760 30828

    Assam 154864 139977 294841 145569 139617 285186 300433 279594 580027

    Bihar* 280219 181897 462184 433107 328063 761377 713326 509960 1223561

    Chhais!arh 88053 79531 167584 68499 65070 133569 156552 144601 301153

    "oa 4414 4015 8429 6775 6291 13066 11189 10306 21495

    "u#ara 296467 268996 565463 409959 370439 780398 706426 639435 1345861

    $ar%ana 128064 112496 240560 162803 135547 298350 290867 248043 538910

    $imachal Pradesh 50886 47050 97936 20581 18811 39392 71467 65861 137328

    &ammu ' (ashmir 30918 28614 59532 45413 41465 86878 76331 70079 146410

    &har)hand 154908 134526 289434 63238 53985 117223 218146 188511 406657(arnaa)a 186826 209389 396215 348353 331815 680168 535179 541204 1076383

    (erala* 109961 101062 211336 170233 162747 333012 280194 263809 544348

    Madh%a Pradesh 315529 296971 612500 519527 486352 1005879 835056 783323 1618379

    Maharashra 419839 356660 776499 638341 561653 1199994 1058180 918313 1976493

    Maniur 4809 4059 8868 9005 8849 17854 13814 12908 26722

    Me!hala%a 33604 31902 65506 6493 6130 12623 40097 38032 78129

    Mi+oram 5649 5245 10894 7451 7190 14641 13100 12435 25535

    ,a!aland 12196 10742 22938 10471 9270 19741 22667 20012 42679

    -disha 211336 197093 408429 172482 157861 330343 383818 354954 738772

    Pun#a. 127324 101229 228553 156047 131646 287693 283371 232875 516246

    /a#ashan 431243 372167 803410 460406 395621 856027 891649 767788 1659437

    i))im 1727 1615 3342 3138 3032 6170 4865 4647 9512

    amil ,adu 127962 123726 251688 419367 387087 806454 547329 510813 1058142

    riura

    ar Pradesh 3254027 855037 4111043

    ara)hand 33031 29268 62299 38193 31602 69795 71224 60870 132094

    es Ben!al 429150 401785 830935 264125 241974 506099 693275 643759 1337034

    Union Territories

    A ' , slands 1484 1463 2947 1500 1440 2940 2984 2903 5887

    Chandi!arh 161 139 300 12830 11118 23948 12991 11257 24248 ' , $aeli 2319 2142 4461 1480 1384 2864 3799 3526 7325

    aman ' iu 655 577 1232 1545 1477 3022 2200 2054 4254

    elhi 9054 8109 17163 176077 161242 337319 185131 169351 354482

    a)shadee 358 310 668 0 0 0 358 310 668

    Puducherr% 1868 1620 3488 22826 21276 44102 24694 22896 47590

    * (erala ' Bihar include he cases o: se; no reored in erson so does no mach ih he addiion o: male and :emale