adp report
Post on 02-Jun-2018
230 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
1/39
SATHYABAMA UNIVERSITY(Established under section 3 of UGC Act, 1956)
Jeppiaar Nagar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai,Chennai 600119, Tamilnadu.
Report on
AIRCRAFT DESIGN PROJECT
Title
SUBMITTED BY:
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
2/39
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to Prof.BSMAUGUSTINE (Head of Aeronautical Department) for giving me his able supportand encouragement. At this occasion I must emphasis the point that this DESIGNPROJECT would have not been possible without the highly informative andvaluable guidance by Mr. Churchil , whose vast knowledge and experience hadmade us to go about this project with ease. We have great pleasure in expressingmy sincere whole hearted thanks to him.
It is worth mentioning about my team mates, friends andcolleagues of aeronautical department, for extending their kind help whenever thenecessity was in demand; I think one and all that have directly or indirectly helpedme in making this design project a great success.
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
3/39
ABBREVIATION
- Density of air
- Dynamic viscosity
- Taper ratio
AR - Aspect ratio
b - Wing spanS - Wing area
Swet - Wetted area
Sref - Reference area
C - Chord of the airfoil
Croot - Chord at rootC tip - Chord at tip
CD - Drag Co-efficient
CL - Lift Co-efficient
D - Drag
L - Lift
E - Endurance
g - Acceleration due to gravity
M - Mach number of aircraft
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
4/39
R - Range
- Climb Angle
T - Thrust
R e - Reynolds number
ROC - Rate of climb
SL - Landing distance
STO - Take off distance
VCruise - Velocity at cruise
Vstall - Velocity at stall
WCrew - Crew weight
We - Empty weight of aircraft
WF - Weight of fuel
W payload - Payload of aircraft
W0 - Overall weight of aircraft
WL - Wing loading
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
5/39
CONTENT
Expt .No .
Experiments Page no .
1. Abstract
2. Plots
3. Weight Estimation
4. Aerodynamic Design
5. Wing and Fuselage design
6. Performance characteristics
7. 3 View Diagram
8. Design of V n Diagram
9. Conclusion
10. Bibliography
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
6/39
ABSTRACT
The purpose of our design project was to design a 200 seater passengermedium range international aircraft by comparing the data and specifications of
present aircrafts in this category. Performance characteristics calculations have also
been performed. Necessary graphs have also been plotted from where certainvalues where deduced. The aircraft possess a low wing, tricycle landing gear and aconventional tail arrangement.
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
7/39
COM PARATI VE DATA SH EET
Name ofthe aircraft
No ofseats
Wingspan(m)
Wingarea(m 2 )
Aspect ratio Serviceceiling(m)
MacdonnellDouglasMD-90
172 32.87 437.1 13.2 12802
Boeing 727 189 32.9 481.01 14.6 10700
Boeing 757 200 38.05 11.25 4.76 12800Boeing 767 181 47.6 283.3 5.95 12200Boeing 767-
300218 47.6 283.3 5.95 12527
Boeing 787 210 60.1 958.23 15.9 13100Boeing 717 117 28.47 337.176 11.84 12500Boeing 737 189 35.7 146.013 4 12500
A320 180 24.1 122.6 3.59 12000
A310 240 43.9 219 4.9 12500A321 220 34.1 122.6 3.59 12000A330 250 60.3 361.6 5.99 12527
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
8/39
Name of theaircraft
Empty fuelweight(kg)
M ax takeoff
weight(kg)
Payload(kg)
MacdonnellDouglasMD-90
35400 43900 172000
Boeing 727 45360 95028 189000
Boeing 757 82380 115680 200000Boeing 767 80130 124880 181000Boeing 767-
30086070 158760 218000
Boeing 787 110000 228000 210000Boeing 717 66406 54900 117000Boeing 737 41413 79010 198000
A320 42600 78000 18000
A310 80142 141974 240000A321 48500 93500 220000A330 180000 230000 250000
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
9/39
Name of theaircraft
Machnumber
Range Serviceceiling
CruisingSpeed
MacdonnellDouglasMD-90
.76 3860 12802 811
Boeing 727 .85 4450 10700 920Boeing 757 .8 7222 12800 850Boeing 767 .8 5200 12200 851Boeing 767-
300.8 5200 12527 851
Boeing 787 .85 5665 13100 903Boeing 717 .77 3815 12500 811Boeing 737 .785 5650 12500 828
A320 .82 5900 12000 828A310 .801 6800 12500 850A321 .78 5900 12000 828A330 .82 12500 12527 871
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
10/39
PLOTS
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
11/39
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
12/39
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
13/39
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
A s p e c t r a t i o
Range (m)
Aspect ratio Vs Range
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
14/39
WEI GH T ESTI M ATI ON
Overall weight of the aircraft includes the crew weight, payload weight,fuel weight and empty weight. The weight of an aircraft will not be constantit will vary according to flight conditions like takeoff, cruising and landing.
The overall weight is given by:-
This equation can be simplified as follows
( ) 1
Now can be estimated by finding the values of and
M ission Profi le
Total number of crew = 8
Assuming weight allotted for one is 100 kg
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
15/39
= = 8000 N
Total number of passenger = 200
=
= 200000N
= Weight at the end of take off
= Weight at the end of Climb
= Weight at the end of Cruise
= Weight at the end of descent (loiter for 20 minutes) = Weight at the end of landing
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
16/39
1 st iteration:
F rom Table:
Take off weight fraction = .970
Climb weight fraction =.980
Landing weight fraction = .995 For Cruise Condition:-
Weight fraction calculation formula is : c =
= ./ Breguets range
=
. /
= 0.784
For Endurance condition
Take endurance for 20min i.e. 1200 s
. /
= 0.992
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
17/39
= (.970) (.985) (.784) (.992) (.995) = 0.74 = (1 )
=
= 0.275Substituting in equation 1
=
= 9, 24,444.44Nnd iteration:
=
=
= 0.465
Substituting in equation 1
=
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
18/39
= 8, 00,000 N
rd iteration
=
= = 0.47
Substituting in equation 1
=
= 815686.27 N.
For Values of A, C, K Refer the table
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
19/39
AEROF OI L SEL ECTI ON
An airfoil in many respects is the heart of the airplane. An airfoilgenerates lift by changing the velocity of the air passing over and under itself. The
airfoil angle of attack and /or camber causes the air over the top of the wing totravel faster than the air beneath the wing. Bernoullis equation shows that highervelocities produce lower pressure, so the upper surface of the airfoil tends to be
pulled upward lower than the ambient pressures while the lower surface of theairfoil tends to be pushed upward by higher than ambient pressure. The integrateddifference in pressure between the top and bottom of the airfoil generate the netlifting force.
Types of aerofoil :
a) Symmetric Aerofoil b) Cambered Aerofoil
1) On a symmetric airfoil, the center of pressure lies exactly on one quarter ofthe chord behind the leading edge
2) On a cambered airfoil, the aerodynamic center lies exactly on one quarter ofthe chord behind the leading edge
3) Supersonic airfoils are much more angular in shape and can have a very sharpleading edge, which is very sensitive to angle of attack. A supercritical airfoil
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
20/39
has its maximum thickness close to the leading edge to have a lot of length toslowly shock the supersonic airfoils have a low camber to reduce dragdivergence. Modern aircraft wings may have different airfoils section alongthe wing span, each one optimized for the conditions in each section of the
wing
In order to select the airfoil we have to find and Re number
To find
During stall L = W
=
= 1.25
=
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
21/39
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
22/39
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
23/39
Lif t :
L = 130.537 KN.
Drag:
= 0.03 + 0.056
C d = 0.0865
Now,
D = 9033.19 N
D = 9.03319 KN.
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
24/39
WI NG DESI GN
After the final weight estimation of the aircraft, the primary componentof the aircraft to be designed is the wing. The wing weight and the liftingcapabilities are in general, a function of the thickness of the aerofoil section that isused in the wing structure. The first step towards designing the wing is thethickness estimation
1. Position of the wing:The location of the wing in the fuselage (along the vertical axis)is very important. Each configuration hasd its own advantages but in
this design, the low wing offers advantages such asa. Uninterrupted passengers cabin.
b. Placement of landing gear in the wing structure itself.c. Location of the engine on a low wing makes engine overhaul easier.d. Landing gear usually becomes high in such wing configurations and
therefore, provides greater ground clearance.e. Low wing affects the flow over the horizontal tail to minimum extent
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
25/39
Design character istics:
m
S = 200 m 2
C = 3.09 m
b = 34 m
AR = 11
= 0.45
Design Calculations:
1. Chord length at root, , - = * + = 8.11 m
2. Chord length at tip =
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
26/39
= 3.649 m
3. Quarter chord line,
= 0.7725 m
4. Mean Aerodynamic chord, = 0 ( )1 = 6.158 m
5. Wing Aerodynamic centre = = 0.25 * 6.158= 1.539 m
6. Distance of aerodynamic centre from fuselage, y`= 0 1 = 7.425 m
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
27/39
F USEL AGE DESI GN
The fuselage is an aircrafts main body section that holds the crew passengers or cargo. The fuselage also serves to position control and stabilizationsurfaces in specific relationships to lifting surfaces, required for aircraft stabilityand maneuverability. It always streamlined to minimize the drag produced.
Wing location Aerodynamics Consideration:
Mid wing position gives lowest interference drag, especially well forsupersonic aircraft.
Top-mounted wing minimizes trailing vortex drag, especially good for low-speed aircraft.
Low wing gives improved landing gear stowage & more usable flap area.
From the above given locations of wings, the one chosen is the Low wingconfiguration which gives improved landing gear and more usable flap area.
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
28/39
Seating ar rangements
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
29/39
Design Calculations:
= 0.85
l = = 40 mFineness ratio, = 8
d = 5 m
= 40.55 m 2
swet = 159.45 m2
Assume length of cone= 4 m
= 2.35 m
Assume length of empennage = 3 m
= 1.8
= 1.66 m
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
30/39
AI RCRAF T PERF ORM ANCECALCULATIONS
The performance of an aircraft is essentially a statement of its capabilities anda different selection of these normally be specified for the various categories such
as transport, military and light aircraft, even though several common performancefactor will feature in every such selection. For the engineer involved in the creationof a new design, these performance features serve as design criteria or at leastdesirable objectives, whereas late in the design and development stages the salesstaff will quote the performance features as the basis for the commercial strength ofthe emerging aircraft. For either reason the performance will be stated in terms ofquantities such as direct operating cost (DOC), maximum range for various
payloads and fuel loads, cruising speed and airport requirements for landing andtake-off. Here we are going to calculate the thrust, landing distance, take-offdistance, rate of climb, climb angle and endurance.
1) Thrust Calculation:
During level flight
. / . /
. / ./ . / . / 0./ ./ . /1
= 0.05880.7838.33
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
31/39
=0.3835
Thrust = 0.3835791215.6815
T = 303.4312139 KN
For one Engine,
T = 151.7156069 KN
2) Landing Distance Calculation:
, -
[()]
3) Takeoff Distance Calculation:
[ ( )]
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
32/39
[)]
= 2354 m
= 2.354 Km
4) Rate Of Climb (ROC):
ROC = Vsin()
ROC = 40.75 m/s
5) Climb Angle ():
. /
6) Endurance (E):
. /
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
33/39
./
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
34/39
3-D VI EWS
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
35/39
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
36/39
V-n DI AGRAM
The v n diagram is a graph portraying load factor velocity for given airplane, along with the constraints on both n and v due to structural
limitations. The v n diagram illustrates some particularly important aspects ofoverall airplane performance.
Load factor aids us in fixing boundaries to an aircraft within which the aircraft isfree to perform and operate. Load factor is dependent on gravity and hence it alsocan be expressed in terms of g. Load factor are assumed and depending in that wehave corresponding velocities and eventually v n plot.
For our calculation, we consider load factors direct proporationality to the squareof velocity. Load factor is given by
Positive load factor indicate that the aircrafts is ascending up.
When n = 1, V = 59 m/s
When n = 2, V = 83.43 m/s
When n = 3, V = 102.19 m/s
When n = 4, V = 118 m/s
Negative load factor are experienced by aircrafts when it descends down.
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
37/39
When n = -1, V = 59 m/s
When n = -2, V = 83.43 m/s
When the velocity is 0, load factor is also zero.
Plot
From the above values of v and n we have a v n diagram
Load factor n = 1 gives an initial boundary limit and a dive speed of 250 m/s gives
a final boundary limit.
The area exposed by continuous lines in the plot is the regime in which the aircraftis bound to perform an operate. The first vertical line crossing X axis at 59 m/ssets the boundary of minimum speed The second vertical line crossing X axis at 250 m/s sets the boundary of maximum speed
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
38/39
Thus the aircraft can operate between velocities of 59 m/s and 250 m/s.
CONCLUSION
A detailed study was concluded on the existing 200-240 seat long range business jet aircraft on design, performance, structure, and aerodynamics. A minor parametric analysis was also made from the design perspective. This study enablesus to design an aircraft with contemporary requirements. The preliminary design
process was made with much of a compromise between science and logic. Theknowledge was very much demanding for every member of the team in order to
produce an effective design. This project greatly enable us to apply our wideknowledge of aerospace in the design of aircraft which was very exciting andchallenging and it had let our imagination take flight , right from the start. In this
project we have finally developed a model of the required aircraft after a detailedstudy. This project would be remembered as the most enjoyable part of theacademic work.
-
8/10/2019 ADP Report
39/39
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1) Janes All the World Aircraft 2) Civil Aircraft Design
Lyoyd R. Jenkinson , Paul Simpkin , Darren Rhodes
3) Aircraft Design A Conceptual Approach Daniel P. Raymer
4) Aircraft Design : Synthesis and Analysis Ilan Kroo , Richard Shevell
top related